Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EICGX vs FHKTX
EICGX vs FHKTX Comparison
Open Charts EICGX vs FHKTX
Eaton Vance China Equity I
Price$19.94
Change-$0.20 (-0.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets45.5M
Fidelity Advisor China Region M
Price$54.84
Change-$0.48 (-0.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.6B
EICGX vs FHKTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EICGX vs. FHKTX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EICGX is a Hold and FHKTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKTX has more cash in the bank: 1.6B vs. EICGX (45.5M). EICGX pays higher dividends than FHKTX: EICGX (1.73) vs FHKTX (0.78). EICGX was incepted earlier than FHKTX: EICGX (16 years) vs FHKTX (17 years). EICGX (1.68) is less costly to investors than FHKTX (1.43). EICGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. FHKTX (30.00). FHKTX has a lower initial minimum investment than EICGX: FHKTX (0) vs EICGX (1000000). FHKTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.67 vs. EICGX (17.76). FHKTX return over 5 years is better than : 13.27 vs. EICGX (-24.43).
| EICGX | FHKTX | EICGX / FHKTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 1.43 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 1.43 | 117% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 37.662 | 45.388 | 83% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 45.5M | 1.6B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.73 | 0.78 | 221% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.76 | 27.67 | 64% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.20 | 98.31 | 22% |
| Returns for 5 years | -24.43 | 13.27 | -184% |
| Returns for 10 years | 4.66 | 98.87 | 5% |