Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EICGX vs MCDFX
EICGX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts EICGX vs MCDFX
Eaton Vance China Equity I
Price$19.94
Change-$0.20 (-0.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets45.5M
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$15.48
Change-$0.14 (-0.90%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets103.71M
EICGX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EICGX vs. MCDFX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EICGX is a Hold and MCDFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 104M vs. EICGX (45.5M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than EICGX: MCDFX (2.78) vs EICGX (1.73). EICGX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: EICGX (16 years) vs MCDFX (16 years). EICGX (1.68) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). EICGX (77.00) and MCDFX (75.80) have comparable annual turnover. MCDFX has a lower initial minimum investment than EICGX: MCDFX (2500) vs EICGX (1000000). EICGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.76 vs. MCDFX (14.24). MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : 1.35 vs. EICGX (-24.43).
| EICGX | MCDFX | EICGX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 1.32 | 95% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 1.32 | 127% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 37.662 | 35.021 | 108% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 45.5M | 104M | 44% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.73 | 2.78 | 62% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.76 | 14.24 | 125% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.20 | 40.02 | 53% |
| Returns for 5 years | -24.43 | 1.35 | -1,807% |
| Returns for 10 years | 4.66 | 48.27 | 10% |