Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EICGX vs MCDFX
EICGX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts EICGX vs MCDFX
Eaton Vance China Equity I
Price$18.91
Change-$0.12 (-0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets43.74M
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$15.10
Change-$0.05 (-0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets99.35M
EICGX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EICGX vs. MCDFX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EICGX is a Hold and MCDFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 99.3M vs. EICGX (43.7M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than EICGX: MCDFX (2.84) vs EICGX (1.80). EICGX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: EICGX (16 years) vs MCDFX (16 years). EICGX (1.68) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). EICGX (77.00) and MCDFX (75.80) have comparable annual turnover. MCDFX has a lower initial minimum investment than EICGX: MCDFX (2500) vs EICGX (1000000). EICGX (33.98) and MCDFX (33.22) have marching annual gain over last year. MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -7.24 vs. EICGX (-34.85).
| EICGX | MCDFX | EICGX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 1.32 | 95% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 1.32 | 127% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 30.075 | 30.959 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 43.7M | 99.3M | 44% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.80 | 2.84 | 63% |
| Returns for 1 year | 33.98 | 33.22 | 102% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.29 | 29.24 | 42% |
| Returns for 5 years | -34.85 | -7.24 | 481% |
| Returns for 10 years | -3.77 | 36.76 | -10% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement