Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EICGX vs MCDFX
EICGX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts EICGX vs MCDFX
Eaton Vance China Equity I
Price$17.02
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.76M
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$13.29
Change-$0.03 (-0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets90.37M
EICGX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EICGX vs. MCDFX commentary
Jul 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EICGX is a Hold and MCDFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 90.4M vs. EICGX (39.8M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than EICGX: MCDFX (3.26) vs EICGX (2.02). EICGX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: EICGX (16 years) vs MCDFX (16 years). EICGX (1.68) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). EICGX (77.00) and MCDFX (75.80) have comparable annual turnover. MCDFX has a lower initial minimum investment than EICGX: MCDFX (2500) vs EICGX (1000000). EICGX (26.16) and MCDFX (25.51) have marching annual gain over last year. MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -12.06 vs. EICGX (-33.53).
| EICGX | MCDFX | EICGX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 1.32 | 95% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 1.32 | 127% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.336 | 14.881 | 110% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 39.8M | 90.4M | 44% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.02 | 3.26 | 62% |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.16 | 25.51 | 103% |
| Returns for 3 years | -10.81 | 3.60 | -301% |
| Returns for 5 years | -33.53 | -12.06 | 278% |
| Returns for 10 years | -20.07 | 12.66 | -159% |