Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EICGX vs MCDFX
EICGX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts EICGX vs MCDFX
Eaton Vance China Equity I
Price$17.65
Change-$0.03 (-0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.09M
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$14.12
Change+$0.02 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets95.69M
EICGX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EICGX vs. MCDFX commentary
Aug 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EICGX is a Buy and MCDFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 95.7M vs. EICGX (41.1M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than EICGX: MCDFX (3.08) vs EICGX (1.97). EICGX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: EICGX (16 years) vs MCDFX (16 years). EICGX (1.68) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). EICGX (77.00) and MCDFX (75.80) have comparable annual turnover. MCDFX has a lower initial minimum investment than EICGX: MCDFX (2500) vs EICGX (1000000). MCDFX (38.93) and EICGX (37.19) have marching annual gain over last year. MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -7.51 vs. EICGX (-31.20).
| EICGX | MCDFX | EICGX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 1.32 | 95% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 1.32 | 127% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.643 | 22.055 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41.1M | 95.7M | 43% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.97 | 3.08 | 64% |
| Returns for 1 year | 37.19 | 38.93 | 96% |
| Returns for 3 years | -3.18 | 13.57 | -23% |
| Returns for 5 years | -31.20 | -7.51 | 415% |
| Returns for 10 years | -13.17 | 23.54 | -56% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement