Ad is loading...
EICGX vs MCDFX
EICGX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts EICGX vs MCDFX
Eaton Vance China Equity I
Price$16.48
Change+$0.24 (+1.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets37.77M
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$12.87
Change+$0.08 (+0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets93.92M
EICGX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EICGX vs. MCDFX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EICGX is a Buy and MCDFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 93.9M vs. EICGX (37.8M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than EICGX: MCDFX (3.72) vs EICGX (2.16). EICGX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: EICGX (16 years) vs MCDFX (15 years). EICGX (1.68) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.17). EICGX (77.00) and MCDFX (75.80) have comparable annual turnover. MCDFX has a lower initial minimum investment than EICGX: MCDFX (2500) vs EICGX (1000000). EICGX (19.00) and MCDFX (18.39) have marching annual gain over last year. MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -3.51 vs. EICGX (-28.58).
| EICGX | MCDFX | EICGX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 1.17 | 108% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 1.17 | 144% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.005 | 8.298 | 133% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 37.8M | 93.9M | 40% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.16 | 3.72 | 58% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.00 | 18.39 | 103% |
| Returns for 3 years | -5.10 | 6.46 | -79% |
| Returns for 5 years | -28.58 | -3.51 | 814% |
| Returns for 10 years | -29.26 | 0.62 | -4,750% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...