Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EICGX vs MCDFX
EICGX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts EICGX vs MCDFX
Eaton Vance China Equity I
Price$19.90
Change+$0.25 (+1.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.61M
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$15.40
Change+$0.11 (+0.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets99.42M
EICGX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EICGX vs. MCDFX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EICGX is a Buy and MCDFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 99.4M vs. EICGX (42.6M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than EICGX: MCDFX (2.90) vs EICGX (1.86). EICGX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: EICGX (16 years) vs MCDFX (16 years). EICGX (1.68) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). EICGX (77.00) and MCDFX (75.80) have comparable annual turnover. MCDFX has a lower initial minimum investment than EICGX: MCDFX (2500) vs EICGX (1000000). EICGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 57.63 vs. MCDFX (51.60). MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -0.18 vs. EICGX (-25.78).
| EICGX | MCDFX | EICGX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 1.32 | 95% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 1.32 | 127% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 34.313 | 32.169 | 107% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.6M | 99.4M | 43% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.86 | 2.90 | 64% |
| Returns for 1 year | 57.63 | 51.60 | 112% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.91 | 30.24 | 43% |
| Returns for 5 years | -25.78 | -0.18 | 14,250% |
| Returns for 10 years | 4.90 | 49.59 | 10% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement