Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EICGX vs TRCLX
EICGX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts EICGX vs TRCLX
Eaton Vance China Equity I
Price$19.90
Change+$0.25 (+1.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.61M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$13.82
Change+$0.14 (+1.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets62.35M
EICGX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRCLX has more cash in the bank: 62.3M vs. EICGX (42.6M). EICGX pays higher dividends than TRCLX: EICGX (1.86) vs TRCLX (1.39). EICGX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: EICGX (16 years) vs TRCLX (6 years). TRCLX (2.10) is less costly to investors than EICGX (1.68). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. EICGX (77.00). TRCLX has a lower initial minimum investment than EICGX: TRCLX (500000) vs EICGX (1000000). EICGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 57.63 vs. TRCLX (46.76). TRCLX return over 5 years is better than : -2.07 vs. EICGX (-25.78).
| EICGX | TRCLX | EICGX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 1.03 | 122% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 2.10 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 34.313 | 29.545 | 116% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 500000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.6M | 62.3M | 68% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.86 | 1.39 | 134% |
| Returns for 1 year | 57.63 | 46.76 | 123% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.91 | 23.14 | 56% |
| Returns for 5 years | -25.78 | -2.07 | 1,249% |
| Returns for 10 years | 4.90 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement