Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EICGX vs TRCLX
EICGX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts EICGX vs TRCLX
Eaton Vance China Equity I
Price$19.94
Change-$0.20 (-0.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets45.5M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$14.05
Change-$0.09 (-0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets66.37M
EICGX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EICGX vs. TRCLX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EICGX is a Hold and TRCLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRCLX has more cash in the bank: 66.4M vs. EICGX (45.5M). EICGX pays higher dividends than TRCLX: EICGX (1.73) vs TRCLX (1.34). EICGX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: EICGX (16 years) vs TRCLX (6 years). TRCLX (2.10) is less costly to investors than EICGX (1.68). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. EICGX (77.00). TRCLX has a lower initial minimum investment than EICGX: TRCLX (500000) vs EICGX (1000000). EICGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.76 vs. TRCLX (12.64). TRCLX return over 5 years is better than : 1.91 vs. EICGX (-24.43).
| EICGX | TRCLX | EICGX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 1.03 | 122% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 2.10 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 37.662 | 33.902 | 111% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 500000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 45.5M | 66.4M | 69% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.73 | 1.34 | 130% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.76 | 12.64 | 140% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.20 | 34.85 | 61% |
| Returns for 5 years | -24.43 | 1.91 | -1,281% |
| Returns for 10 years | 4.66 | N/A | - |