Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EICGX vs TRCLX
EICGX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts EICGX vs TRCLX
Eaton Vance China Equity I
Price$17.65
Change-$0.03 (-0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.09M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$12.54
Change+$0.12 (+0.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets52.93M
EICGX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRCLX has more cash in the bank: 52.9M vs. EICGX (41.1M). EICGX pays higher dividends than TRCLX: EICGX (1.97) vs TRCLX (1.56). EICGX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: EICGX (16 years) vs TRCLX (6 years). TRCLX (2.10) is less costly to investors than EICGX (1.68). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. EICGX (77.00). TRCLX has a lower initial minimum investment than EICGX: TRCLX (500000) vs EICGX (1000000). EICGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 37.19 vs. TRCLX (30.27). TRCLX return over 5 years is better than : -7.39 vs. EICGX (-31.20).
| EICGX | TRCLX | EICGX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 1.03 | 122% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 2.10 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.643 | 18.750 | 110% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 500000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41.1M | 52.9M | 78% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.97 | 1.56 | 126% |
| Returns for 1 year | 37.19 | 30.27 | 123% |
| Returns for 3 years | -3.18 | 8.42 | -38% |
| Returns for 5 years | -31.20 | -7.39 | 422% |
| Returns for 10 years | -13.17 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement