Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EICGX vs TRCLX
EICGX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts EICGX vs TRCLX
Eaton Vance China Equity I
Price$16.69
Change-$0.10 (-0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets38.71M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$11.33
Change-$0.16 (-1.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets45.4M
EICGX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRCLX has more cash in the bank: 45.4M vs. EICGX (38.7M). EICGX pays higher dividends than TRCLX: EICGX (2.10) vs TRCLX (1.69). EICGX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: EICGX (16 years) vs TRCLX (6 years). TRCLX (2.10) is less costly to investors than EICGX (1.68). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. EICGX (77.00). TRCLX has a lower initial minimum investment than EICGX: TRCLX (500000) vs EICGX (1000000). EICGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.33 vs. TRCLX (8.72). TRCLX return over 5 years is better than : -3.68 vs. EICGX (-29.00).
| EICGX | TRCLX | EICGX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 1.03 | 122% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 2.10 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.764 | 8.807 | 168% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 500000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 38.7M | 45.4M | 85% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.10 | 1.69 | 124% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.33 | 8.72 | 256% |
| Returns for 3 years | -14.50 | -5.88 | 246% |
| Returns for 5 years | -29.00 | -3.68 | 788% |
| Returns for 10 years | -26.46 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers