Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EICGX vs TRCLX
EICGX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts EICGX vs TRCLX
Eaton Vance China Equity I
Price$17.02
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.76M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$11.86
Change-$0.09 (-0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets49.83M
EICGX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRCLX has more cash in the bank: 49.8M vs. EICGX (39.8M). EICGX pays higher dividends than TRCLX: EICGX (2.02) vs TRCLX (1.61). EICGX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: EICGX (16 years) vs TRCLX (6 years). TRCLX (2.10) is less costly to investors than EICGX (1.68). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. EICGX (77.00). TRCLX has a lower initial minimum investment than EICGX: TRCLX (500000) vs EICGX (1000000). EICGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.16 vs. TRCLX (14.89). TRCLX return over 5 years is better than : -7.51 vs. EICGX (-33.53).
| EICGX | TRCLX | EICGX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 1.03 | 122% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 2.10 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.336 | 12.311 | 133% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 500000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 39.8M | 49.8M | 80% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.02 | 1.61 | 126% |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.16 | 14.89 | 176% |
| Returns for 3 years | -10.81 | -2.26 | 479% |
| Returns for 5 years | -33.53 | -7.51 | 446% |
| Returns for 10 years | -20.07 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement