Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EIFVX vs RMFCX
EIFVX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts EIFVX vs RMFCX
Eaton Vance Focused Value Opps I
Price$19.74
Change-$0.19 (-0.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets232.47M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$57.52
Change-$0.44 (-0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.76B
EIFVX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EIFVX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EIFVX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 106B vs. EIFVX (232M). EIFVX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: EIFVX (1.39) vs RMFCX (1.31). EIFVX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: EIFVX (14 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than EIFVX (0.79). EIFVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than EIFVX: RMFCX (250) vs EIFVX (1000000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.70 vs. EIFVX (-1.28). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 59.85 vs. EIFVX (39.91).
| EIFVX | RMFCX | EIFVX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.91 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.91 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.554 | 6.021 | -9% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 232M | 106B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.39 | 1.31 | 106% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.28 | 8.70 | -15% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.64 | 28.43 | 55% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.91 | 59.85 | 67% |
| Returns for 10 years | 48.94 | 69.75 | 70% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement