Ad is loading...
EIFVX vs RMFCX
EIFVX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts EIFVX vs RMFCX
Eaton Vance Focused Value Opps I
Price$18.18
Change-$0.02 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets234.13M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$52.60
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets96.51B
EIFVX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EIFVX vs. RMFCX commentary
Apr 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EIFVX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 96.5B vs. EIFVX (234M). EIFVX (1.39) and RMFCX (1.34) have matching dividends . EIFVX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: EIFVX (14 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than EIFVX (0.79). EIFVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than EIFVX: RMFCX (250) vs EIFVX (1000000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.60 vs. EIFVX (-4.85). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 48.78 vs. EIFVX (37.51).
| EIFVX | RMFCX | EIFVX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.91 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.91 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.312 | -3.342 | 249% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 234M | 96.5B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.39 | 1.34 | 103% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.85 | 3.60 | -135% |
| Returns for 3 years | -4.81 | 5.79 | -83% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.51 | 48.78 | 77% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.66 | 52.90 | 64% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...