Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EIFVX vs RMFCX
EIFVX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts EIFVX vs RMFCX
Eaton Vance Focused Value Opps I
Price$20.54
Change+$0.08 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets237.77M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$59.46
Change+$0.39 (+0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.01B
EIFVX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EIFVX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EIFVX is a StrongBuy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. EIFVX (238M). EIFVX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: EIFVX (1.36) vs RMFCX (1.27). EIFVX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: EIFVX (14 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than EIFVX (0.79). EIFVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than EIFVX: RMFCX (250) vs EIFVX (1000000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.47 vs. EIFVX (2.72). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 61.83 vs. EIFVX (47.69).
| EIFVX | RMFCX | EIFVX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.91 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.91 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.476 | 9.596 | 36% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 238M | 109B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.36 | 1.27 | 107% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.72 | 11.47 | 24% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.50 | 29.27 | 63% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.69 | 61.83 | 77% |
| Returns for 10 years | 57.89 | 79.21 | 73% |