Ad is loading...
EIFVX vs RMFCX
EIFVX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts EIFVX vs RMFCX
Eaton Vance Focused Value Opps I
Price$19.27
Change+$0.10 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets219.61M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$55.11
Change+$0.11 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets100.63B
EIFVX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EIFVX vs. RMFCX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EIFVX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 101B vs. EIFVX (220M). EIFVX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: EIFVX (1.45) vs RMFCX (1.37). EIFVX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: EIFVX (14 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than EIFVX (0.79). EIFVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than EIFVX: RMFCX (250) vs EIFVX (1000000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.35 vs. EIFVX (-5.21). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 56.16 vs. EIFVX (41.25).
| EIFVX | RMFCX | EIFVX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.91 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.91 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.426 | 1.270 | -270% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 220M | 101B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.45 | 1.37 | 106% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.21 | 5.35 | -97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.46 | 17.29 | 49% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.25 | 56.16 | 73% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.07 | 60.33 | 68% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...