Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EIFVX vs RWEBX
EIFVX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts EIFVX vs RWEBX
Eaton Vance Focused Value Opps I
Price$21.29
Change+$0.07 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets240.18M
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$67.34
Change+$0.46 (+0.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets209.78B
EIFVX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EIFVX vs. RWEBX commentary
Oct 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EIFVX is a Buy and RWEBX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 210B vs. EIFVX (240M). EIFVX pays higher dividends than RWEBX: EIFVX (1.31) vs RWEBX (0.76). EIFVX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: EIFVX (15 years) vs RWEBX (11 years). RWEBX (1.06) is less costly to investors than EIFVX (0.81). EIFVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. RWEBX (29.00). RWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than EIFVX: RWEBX (250) vs EIFVX (1000000). RWEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.09 vs. EIFVX (0.23). RWEBX return over 5 years is better than : 48.85 vs. EIFVX (41.76).
| EIFVX | RWEBX | EIFVX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.06 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 1.06 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.254 | 10.757 | 67% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 240M | 210B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.31 | 0.76 | 172% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.23 | 6.09 | 4% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.46 | 36.45 | 53% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.76 | 48.85 | 85% |
| Returns for 10 years | 64.60 | 72.56 | 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement