EIG vs RMBS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EIG is a StrongBuy and RMBS is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
EIG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRMBS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- EIG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- RMBS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
EIG’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RMBS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- EIG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- RMBS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
EIG (@Specialty Insurance) experienced а +0.12% price change this week, while RMBS (@Semiconductors) price change was +11.42% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Insurance industry was +1.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.78%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was +8.65%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.23%, and the average quarterly price growth was -11.76%.
Reported Earning Dates
EIG is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.
RMBS is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Specialty Insurance (+1.51% weekly)Specialty insurance typically caters to niche-markets, and covers items that are special or unique and/or items that are not typically covered under other insurance policies. Restoration or purchase of a one-of-a-kind collector’s item, high-value home, recreational vehicles, sailboat or even jet skis, horses and farms, all-terrain vehicle, funerals, museums and fine art collections are some examples– one or more of which are covered by a specialty insurance provider. In some cases, a specialty insurance could also complement someone’s existing auto, home and umbrella policies. Markel Corp, for Fidelity National Financial, Inc., Assurant, Inc. and Athene Holding Ltd. are examples of specialty insurance providers.
@Semiconductors (+8.65% weekly)The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.
| EIG | RMBS | EIG / RMBS | |
| Capitalization | 1.13B | 5.47B | 21% |
| EBITDA | N/A | 244M | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.727 | -3.632 | 130% |
| P/E Ratio | 10.06 | 30.87 | 33% |
| Revenue | 851M | 557M | 153% |
| Total Cash | 913M | 482M | 189% |
| Total Debt | 5.9M | 30.2M | 20% |
EIG | RMBS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 45 | 28 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 50 Fair valued | 50 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 28 | 34 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 64 | 52 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 52 | 60 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 40 | 13 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
EIG's Valuation (50) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as RMBS (50) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that EIG’s stock grew similarly to RMBS’s over the last 12 months.
EIG's Profit vs Risk Rating (28) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as RMBS (34) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that EIG’s stock grew similarly to RMBS’s over the last 12 months.
RMBS's SMR Rating (52) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as EIG (64) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry. This means that RMBS’s stock grew similarly to EIG’s over the last 12 months.
EIG's Price Growth Rating (52) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as RMBS (60) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that EIG’s stock grew similarly to RMBS’s over the last 12 months.
RMBS's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as EIG (40) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry. This means that RMBS’s stock grew similarly to EIG’s over the last 12 months.
| EIG | RMBS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 87% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 59% | 3 days ago 65% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 54% | 3 days ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 54% | 3 days ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 54% | 3 days ago 75% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 44% | 3 days ago 63% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 51% | 3 days ago 75% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 21 days ago 54% | 11 days ago 64% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 64% | 3 days ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 41% | 6 days ago 67% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| CSQ | 15.97 | 0.26 | +1.62% |
| Calamos Strategic Total Return | |||
| MOTO | 40.28 | 0.58 | +1.47% |
| SmartETFs Smart Trans & Tch ETF | |||
| BFEB | 41.06 | 0.21 | +0.51% |
| Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF™ - Feb | |||
| GCOR | 41.10 | 0.18 | +0.44% |
| Goldman Sachs Access US Aggregate Bd ETF | |||
| EOCT | 26.58 | 0.02 | +0.07% |
| Innovator Emerg Mkts Pwr Bffr ETF™-Oct | |||
EIG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EIG has been loosely correlated with AXS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EIG jumps, then AXS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EIG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EIG | 100% | -0.80% | ||
| AXS - EIG | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.79% | ||
| ACT - EIG | 64% Loosely correlated | -1.78% | ||
| RDN - EIG | 63% Loosely correlated | -1.69% | ||
| NMIH - EIG | 63% Loosely correlated | -1.47% | ||
| ESNT - EIG | 60% Loosely correlated | -1.05% | ||
More | ||||
RMBS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RMBS has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RMBS jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RMBS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RMBS | 100% | +3.20% | ||
| LRCX - RMBS | 79% Closely correlated | +0.73% | ||
| KLIC - RMBS | 78% Closely correlated | +0.25% | ||
| KLAC - RMBS | 77% Closely correlated | +0.75% | ||
| ENTG - RMBS | 76% Closely correlated | +1.28% | ||
| AMAT - RMBS | 76% Closely correlated | +0.92% | ||
More | ||||