EIHDF
Price
$0.96
Change
+$0.02 (+2.13%)
Updated
Aug 7 closing price
Capitalization
351.35M
GMALF
Price
$0.45
Change
+$0.07 (+18.42%)
Updated
May 13 closing price
Capitalization
2.67B
Interact to see
Advertisement

EIHDF vs GMALF

Header iconEIHDF vs GMALF Comparison
Open Charts EIHDF vs GMALFBanner chart's image
888 Holdings
Price$0.96
Change+$0.02 (+2.13%)
Volume$600
Capitalization351.35M
Genting Malaysia Berhad
Price$0.45
Change+$0.07 (+18.42%)
Volume$100
Capitalization2.67B
EIHDF vs GMALF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EIHDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EIHDF vs. GMALF commentary
Aug 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EIHDF is a Buy and GMALF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 28, 2025
Stock price -- (EIHDF: $0.96 vs. GMALF: $0.45)
Brand notoriety: EIHDF and GMALF are both not notable
EIHDF represents the Casinos/Gaming, while GMALF is part of the Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EIHDF: 40% vs. GMALF: 100%
Market capitalization -- EIHDF: $351.35M vs. GMALF: $2.67B
EIHDF [@Casinos/Gaming] is valued at $351.35M. GMALF’s [@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines] market capitalization is $2.67B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry ranges from $53.67B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines] industry ranges from $38.92B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry is $5.57B. The average market capitalization across the [@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines] industry is $5.87B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EIHDF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGMALF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • EIHDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GMALF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both EIHDF and GMALF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EIHDF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • EIHDF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 1 bearish.

Price Growth

EIHDF (@Casinos/Gaming) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while GMALF (@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Casinos/Gaming industry was -0.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.66%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines industry was +3.62%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.66%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.51%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Casinos/Gaming (-0.05% weekly)

Casinos/Gaming includes companies that operate casinos, gaming services, horse racing and harness racing facilities. Think Las Vegas Sands Corp., MGM Resorts International and Wynn Resorts, Ltd. In periods of strong economic growth, consumers tend to spend on discretionary/leisure activities like gambling or games; but consumption is likely to slow down when there’s economic sluggishness.

@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines (+3.62% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate and manage one or more of the following: lodging facilities (e.g. hotels and motels), resorts (e.g. ski resorts), spas, cruise ships and timeshare facilities. Marriott International, Inc., Carnival Corporation, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. and Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. are some of the biggest names in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GMALF($2.67B) has a higher market cap than EIHDF($351M). EIHDF YTD gains are higher at: 28.198 vs. GMALF (-15.109). GMALF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.41B vs. EIHDF (285M). GMALF has more cash in the bank: 3.43B vs. EIHDF (243M). EIHDF has less debt than GMALF: EIHDF (1.82B) vs GMALF (13.3B). GMALF has higher revenues than EIHDF: GMALF (10.7B) vs EIHDF (1.78B).
EIHDFGMALFEIHDF / GMALF
Capitalization351M2.67B13%
EBITDA285M2.41B12%
Gain YTD28.198-15.109-187%
P/E RatioN/A40.58-
Revenue1.78B10.7B17%
Total Cash243M3.43B7%
Total Debt1.82B13.3B14%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EIHDF vs GMALF: Fundamental Ratings
EIHDF
GMALF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3829
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
13
Undervalued
14
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
10089
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4675
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8012
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EIHDF's Valuation (13) in the null industry is in the same range as GMALF (14). This means that EIHDF’s stock grew similarly to GMALF’s over the last 12 months.

EIHDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as GMALF (100). This means that EIHDF’s stock grew similarly to GMALF’s over the last 12 months.

GMALF's SMR Rating (89) in the null industry is in the same range as EIHDF (100). This means that GMALF’s stock grew similarly to EIHDF’s over the last 12 months.

EIHDF's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as GMALF (75). This means that EIHDF’s stock grew similarly to GMALF’s over the last 12 months.

GMALF's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for EIHDF (80). This means that GMALF’s stock grew significantly faster than EIHDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EIHDFGMALF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
19%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
15%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EIHDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WBSNX29.310.21
+0.72%
William Blair Small Cap Growth N
FIREX10.69N/A
N/A
Fidelity Intl Real Estate
JHTRX20.18N/A
N/A
JPMorgan Hedged Equity 3 R6
MINJX44.55N/A
N/A
MFS International Intrinsic Value R6
LSPIX5.47N/A
N/A
LoCorr Spectrum Income I

EIHDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EIHDF and WYNMF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EIHDF and WYNMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EIHDF
1D Price
Change %
EIHDF100%
N/A
WYNMF - EIHDF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EVVTY - EIHDF
13%
Poorly correlated
-0.12%
EVGGF - EIHDF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GMVHF - EIHDF
12%
Poorly correlated
+4.99%
GEBHF - EIHDF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

GMALF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GMALF and GIGNF have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GMALF and GIGNF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GMALF
1D Price
Change %
GMALF100%
N/A
GIGNF - GMALF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EIHDF - GMALF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GEBHY - GMALF
1%
Poorly correlated
-5.35%
GLXZ - GMALF
1%
Poorly correlated
-0.35%
GHIFF - GMALF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More