Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EIIMX vs RCWBX
EIIMX vs RCWBX Comparison
Open Charts EIIMX vs RCWBX
Eaton Vance Global Sovereign Opps I
Price$6.78
Change+$0.03 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets35.06M
American Funds Capital World Bond R2
Price$16.22
Change+$0.16 (+1.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.97B
EIIMX vs RCWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EIIMX vs. RCWBX commentary
Aug 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EIIMX is a Hold and RCWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RCWBX has more cash in the bank: 9.97B vs. EIIMX (35.1M). EIIMX pays higher dividends than RCWBX: EIIMX (5.05) vs RCWBX (2.78). EIIMX was incepted earlier than RCWBX: EIIMX (14 years) vs RCWBX (23 years). EIIMX (2.32) is less costly to investors than RCWBX (1.58). RCWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 251.00 vs. EIIMX (227.00). RCWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than EIIMX: RCWBX (250) vs EIIMX (1000000). EIIMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.83 vs. RCWBX (3.84). EIIMX return over 5 years is better than : -1.53 vs. RCWBX (-15.90).
| EIIMX | RCWBX | EIIMX / RCWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 1.58 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.32 | 1.58 | 147% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.602 | 6.803 | 141% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 35.1M | 9.97B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.05 | 2.78 | 181% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.83 | 3.84 | 178% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.70 | 2.99 | 559% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.53 | -15.90 | 10% |
| Returns for 10 years | 3.07 | -2.63 | -117% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement