Ad is loading...
EILMX vs FGNSX
EILMX vs FGNSX Comparison
Open Charts EILMX vs FGNSX
Eaton Vance Ntnl Ultr Shrt Muni Inc I
Price$9.73
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets324.72M
Strategic Advisers Tx-Snstv Shrt Dur
Price$10.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.48B
EILMX vs FGNSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EILMX vs. FGNSX commentary
May 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EILMX is a Hold and FGNSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FGNSX has more cash in the bank: 3.48B vs. EILMX (325M). EILMX pays higher dividends than FGNSX: EILMX (3.36) vs FGNSX (3.16). EILMX was incepted earlier than FGNSX: EILMX (15 years) vs FGNSX (7 years). EILMX (0.41) is less costly to investors than FGNSX (0.34). EILMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 159.00 vs. FGNSX (68.00). FGNSX has a lower initial minimum investment than EILMX: FGNSX (0) vs EILMX (1000000). FGNSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.75 vs. EILMX (3.31). FGNSX return over 5 years is better than : 9.85 vs. EILMX (8.26).
| EILMX | FGNSX | EILMX / FGNSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.09 | 389% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 0.34 | 121% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.576 | 0.672 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 325M | 3.48B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.36 | 3.16 | 106% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.31 | 3.75 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.03 | 9.44 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.26 | 9.85 | 84% |
| Returns for 10 years | 7.69 | N/A | - |