EIPAF
Price
$14.95
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Feb 19 closing price
Capitalization
50.51B
NFG
Price
$72.68
Change
-$0.07 (-0.10%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
4.92B
66 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

EIPAF vs NFG

Header iconEIPAF vs NFG Comparison
Open Charts EIPAF vs NFGBanner chart's image
ENI S.p.A
Price$14.95
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$253
Capitalization50.51B
National Fuel Gas
Price$72.68
Change-$0.07 (-0.10%)
Volume$764.01K
Capitalization4.92B
EIPAF vs NFG Comparison Chart
Loading...
NFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EIPAF vs. NFG commentary
Feb 24, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EIPAF is a Hold and NFG is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 24, 2025
Stock price -- (EIPAF: $14.95 vs. NFG: $72.68)
Brand notoriety: EIPAF and NFG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Integrated Oil industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EIPAF: 51% vs. NFG: 121%
Market capitalization -- EIPAF: $50.51B vs. NFG: $4.92B
EIPAF [@Integrated Oil] is valued at $50.51B. NFG’s [@Integrated Oil] market capitalization is $4.92B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Integrated Oil] industry ranges from $461.22B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Integrated Oil] industry is $63.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EIPAF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNFG’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • EIPAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NFG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, NFG is a better buy in the long-term than EIPAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NFG’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • NFG’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

EIPAF (@Integrated Oil) experienced а +4.11% price change this week, while NFG (@Integrated Oil) price change was +0.66% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Integrated Oil industry was -1.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.99%.

Reported Earning Dates

NFG is expected to report earnings on May 01, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Integrated Oil (-1.41% weekly)

Integrated oil companies are involved across nearly the entire oil value chain – from upstream operations like exploration and production, to downstream functions of refining and marketing. Exxon Mobil Corporation, Chevron Corporation and BP are major integrated oil companies. Their bottom lines’ response to crude oil prices could depend on the proportion of upstream vs. downstream businesses; for example, if a company has substantial downstream business, the adverse impact on their upstream business due to falling crude prices could be mitigated by benefits to its downstream business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EIPAF($50.5B) has a higher market cap than NFG($4.92B). NFG has higher P/E ratio than EIPAF: NFG (11.18) vs EIPAF (3.37). NFG YTD gains are higher at: 19.776 vs. EIPAF (13.602). EIPAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 37B vs. NFG (1.15B). EIPAF has more cash in the bank: 19.1B vs. NFG (41.7M). NFG has less debt than EIPAF: NFG (2.69B) vs EIPAF (31.8B). EIPAF has higher revenues than NFG: EIPAF (128B) vs NFG (2.04B).
EIPAFNFGEIPAF / NFG
Capitalization50.5B4.92B1,027%
EBITDA37B1.15B3,212%
Gain YTD13.60219.77669%
P/E Ratio3.3711.1830%
Revenue128B2.04B6,275%
Total Cash19.1B41.7M45,803%
Total Debt31.8B2.69B1,184%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EIPAF vs NFG: Fundamental Ratings
EIPAF
NFG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
40
Fair valued
78
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10021
SMR RATING
1..100
8389
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5440
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
112
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EIPAF's Valuation (40) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NFG (78) in the Integrated Oil industry. This means that EIPAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NFG’s over the last 12 months.

NFG's Profit vs Risk Rating (21) in the Integrated Oil industry is significantly better than the same rating for EIPAF (100) in the null industry. This means that NFG’s stock grew significantly faster than EIPAF’s over the last 12 months.

EIPAF's SMR Rating (83) in the null industry is in the same range as NFG (89) in the Integrated Oil industry. This means that EIPAF’s stock grew similarly to NFG’s over the last 12 months.

NFG's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Integrated Oil industry is in the same range as EIPAF (54) in the null industry. This means that NFG’s stock grew similarly to EIPAF’s over the last 12 months.

NFG's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Integrated Oil industry is in the same range as EIPAF (11) in the null industry. This means that NFG’s stock grew similarly to EIPAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NFG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
39%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
41%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
36%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
58%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
30%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
NFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
KDRN23.080.28
+1.23%
Kingsbarn Tactical Bond ETF
DIAL17.790.02
+0.11%
Columbia Diversified Fixed Inc Allc ETF
HFND22.30-0.20
-0.88%
Unlimited HFND Multi-Strgy Ret Trckr ETF
SDCI20.93-0.33
-1.55%
USCF SummerHaven Dyn CmdtyStgy NoK-1 ETF
IWL148.47-2.64
-1.75%
iShares Russell Top 200 ETF

EIPAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EIPAF and GLPEF have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EIPAF and GLPEF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EIPAF
1D Price
Change %
EIPAF100%
N/A
GLPEF - EIPAF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BPAQF - EIPAF
3%
Poorly correlated
-2.63%
NFG - EIPAF
1%
Poorly correlated
-0.10%
SLNG - EIPAF
-4%
Poorly correlated
-5.42%
TGS - EIPAF
-5%
Poorly correlated
-3.08%
More

NFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NFG has been loosely correlated with EC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NFG jumps, then EC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NFG
1D Price
Change %
NFG100%
-0.10%
EC - NFG
46%
Loosely correlated
-4.66%
XOM - NFG
35%
Loosely correlated
-1.17%
E - NFG
32%
Poorly correlated
-1.52%
CVX - NFG
32%
Poorly correlated
-1.18%
SHEL - NFG
31%
Poorly correlated
-2.46%
More