EIPAF
Price
$16.70
Change
-$0.55 (-3.19%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
52.29B
SLNG
Price
$3.48
Change
-$0.26 (-6.95%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
64.72M
60 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

EIPAF vs SLNG

Header iconEIPAF vs SLNG Comparison
Open Charts EIPAF vs SLNGBanner chart's image
ENI S.p.A
Price$16.70
Change-$0.55 (-3.19%)
Volume$2.02K
Capitalization52.29B
Stabilis Solutions
Price$3.48
Change-$0.26 (-6.95%)
Volume$31.06K
Capitalization64.72M
EIPAF vs SLNG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EIPAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLNG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EIPAF vs. SLNG commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EIPAF is a Hold and SLNG is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (EIPAF: $16.70 vs. SLNG: $3.48)
Brand notoriety: EIPAF and SLNG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Integrated Oil industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EIPAF: 305% vs. SLNG: 268%
Market capitalization -- EIPAF: $52.29B vs. SLNG: $64.72M
EIPAF [@Integrated Oil] is valued at $52.29B. SLNG’s [@Integrated Oil] market capitalization is $64.72M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Integrated Oil] industry ranges from $465.67B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Integrated Oil] industry is $56.45B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EIPAF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileSLNG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EIPAF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • SLNG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, EIPAF is a better buy in the long-term than SLNG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EIPAF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SLNG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EIPAF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SLNG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SLNG is a better buy in the short-term than EIPAF.

Price Growth

EIPAF (@Integrated Oil) experienced а -3.24% price change this week, while SLNG (@Integrated Oil) price change was -14.50% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Integrated Oil industry was -2.54%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.01%.

Reported Earning Dates

SLNG is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Integrated Oil (-2.54% weekly)

Integrated oil companies are involved across nearly the entire oil value chain – from upstream operations like exploration and production, to downstream functions of refining and marketing. Exxon Mobil Corporation, Chevron Corporation and BP are major integrated oil companies. Their bottom lines’ response to crude oil prices could depend on the proportion of upstream vs. downstream businesses; for example, if a company has substantial downstream business, the adverse impact on their upstream business due to falling crude prices could be mitigated by benefits to its downstream business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EIPAF($52.3B) has a higher market cap than SLNG($64.7M). SLNG has higher P/E ratio than EIPAF: SLNG (74.90) vs EIPAF (19.36). EIPAF YTD gains are higher at: 26.900 vs. SLNG (-34.953). EIPAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 24.3B vs. SLNG (8.78M). EIPAF has more cash in the bank: 16.6B vs. SLNG (12.2M). SLNG has less debt than EIPAF: SLNG (8.36M) vs EIPAF (34.9B). EIPAF has higher revenues than SLNG: EIPAF (85.5B) vs SLNG (69.6M).
EIPAFSLNGEIPAF / SLNG
Capitalization52.3B64.7M80,835%
EBITDA24.3B8.78M276,639%
Gain YTD26.900-34.953-77%
P/E Ratio19.3674.9026%
Revenue85.5B69.6M122,845%
Total Cash16.6B12.2M136,066%
Total Debt34.9B8.36M417,664%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EIPAF vs SLNG: Fundamental Ratings
EIPAF
SLNG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8552
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
25
Undervalued
89
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3289
SMR RATING
1..100
8690
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5289
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
136
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EIPAF's Valuation (25) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SLNG (89). This means that EIPAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SLNG’s over the last 12 months.

EIPAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (32) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SLNG (89). This means that EIPAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SLNG’s over the last 12 months.

EIPAF's SMR Rating (86) in the null industry is in the same range as SLNG (90). This means that EIPAF’s stock grew similarly to SLNG’s over the last 12 months.

EIPAF's Price Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SLNG (89). This means that EIPAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SLNG’s over the last 12 months.

SLNG's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the null industry is in the same range as EIPAF (13). This means that SLNG’s stock grew similarly to EIPAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EIPAFSLNG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 27 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EIPAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLNG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OCG3.910.24
+6.54%
Oriental Culture Holding Ltd
WOW5.140.06
+1.18%
WideOpenWest
HAO1.140.01
+0.88%
Haoxi Health Technology Limited
SDRL32.760.02
+0.06%
Seadrill Limited
TXRH168.85-0.52
-0.31%
Texas Roadhouse

EIPAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EIPAF and GLPEF have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EIPAF and GLPEF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EIPAF
1D Price
Change %
EIPAF100%
-3.19%
GLPEF - EIPAF
5%
Poorly correlated
-7.85%
BPAQF - EIPAF
3%
Poorly correlated
-2.28%
NFG - EIPAF
1%
Poorly correlated
-0.30%
SLNG - EIPAF
-4%
Poorly correlated
-7.08%
TGS - EIPAF
-5%
Poorly correlated
-0.41%
More

SLNG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SLNG and PBR have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SLNG and PBR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SLNG
1D Price
Change %
SLNG100%
-7.08%
PBR - SLNG
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.37%
IMO - SLNG
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.22%
E - SLNG
17%
Poorly correlated
-1.98%
BP - SLNG
14%
Poorly correlated
-1.08%
TTE - SLNG
14%
Poorly correlated
-0.96%
More