Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EISAX vs HFQRX
EISAX vs HFQRX Comparison
Open Charts EISAX vs HFQRX
Carillon ClariVest Intl Stock A
Price$30.32
Change-$0.04 (-0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets833.74M
Janus Henderson Global Equity Income N
Price$6.96
Change-$0.05 (-0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.7B
EISAX vs HFQRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EISAX vs. HFQRX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EISAX is a Hold and HFQRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HFQRX has more cash in the bank: 6.7B vs. EISAX (834M). HFQRX pays higher dividends than EISAX: HFQRX (7.24) vs EISAX (2.22). EISAX was incepted earlier than HFQRX: EISAX (13 years) vs HFQRX (10 years). EISAX (1.28) is less costly to investors than HFQRX (0.70). HFQRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 155.00 vs. EISAX (23.00). EISAX has a lower initial minimum investment than HFQRX: EISAX (1000) vs HFQRX (1000000). EISAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.90 vs. HFQRX (20.72). EISAX return over 5 years is better than : 89.88 vs. HFQRX (59.64).
| EISAX | HFQRX | EISAX / HFQRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 0.70 | 183% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 0.70 | 183% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 30.693 | 22.066 | 139% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 834M | 6.7B | 12% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.22 | 7.24 | 31% |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.90 | 20.72 | 140% |
| Returns for 3 years | 77.48 | 45.56 | 170% |
| Returns for 5 years | 89.88 | 59.64 | 151% |
| Returns for 10 years | 114.72 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers