Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EISAX vs HFQRX
EISAX vs HFQRX Comparison
Open Charts EISAX vs HFQRX
Carillon ClariVest Intl Stock A
Price$28.74
Change+$0.18 (+0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets734.11M
Janus Henderson Global Equity Income N
Price$7.08
Change+$0.01 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.44B
EISAX vs HFQRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EISAX vs. HFQRX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EISAX is a Buy and HFQRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HFQRX has more cash in the bank: 6.44B vs. EISAX (734M). HFQRX pays higher dividends than EISAX: HFQRX (7.40) vs EISAX (2.51). EISAX was incepted earlier than HFQRX: EISAX (13 years) vs HFQRX (10 years). EISAX (1.28) is less costly to investors than HFQRX (0.70). HFQRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 155.00 vs. EISAX (23.00). EISAX has a lower initial minimum investment than HFQRX: EISAX (1000) vs HFQRX (1000000). EISAX (20.07) and HFQRX (19.26) have marching annual gain over last year. EISAX return over 5 years is better than : 87.29 vs. HFQRX (69.86).
| EISAX | HFQRX | EISAX / HFQRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 0.70 | 183% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 0.70 | 183% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.944 | 22.158 | 104% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 734M | 6.44B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.51 | 7.40 | 34% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.07 | 19.26 | 104% |
| Returns for 3 years | 73.09 | 52.08 | 140% |
| Returns for 5 years | 87.29 | 69.86 | 125% |
| Returns for 10 years | 104.92 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement