Ad is loading...
EISAX vs HFQRX
EISAX vs HFQRX Comparison
Open Charts EISAX vs HFQRX
Carillon ClariVest Intl Stock A
Price$24.08
Change-$0.59 (-2.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets609.51M
Janus Henderson Global Equity Income N
Price$6.33
Change-$0.12 (-1.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.83B
EISAX vs HFQRX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EISAX vs. HFQRX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EISAX is a Hold and HFQRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HFQRX has more cash in the bank: 5.83B vs. EISAX (610M). HFQRX pays higher dividends than EISAX: HFQRX (7.88) vs EISAX (2.79). EISAX was incepted earlier than HFQRX: EISAX (12 years) vs HFQRX (9 years). EISAX (1.28) is less costly to investors than HFQRX (0.70). HFQRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 155.00 vs. EISAX (44.00). EISAX has a lower initial minimum investment than HFQRX: EISAX (1000) vs HFQRX (1000000). HFQRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.30 vs. EISAX (9.63). EISAX return over 5 years is better than : 105.37 vs. HFQRX (85.14).
| EISAX | HFQRX | EISAX / HFQRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 0.70 | 180% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 0.70 | 183% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.199 | 8.306 | 75% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 610M | 5.83B | 10% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.79 | 7.88 | 35% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.63 | 12.30 | 78% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.83 | 20.29 | 142% |
| Returns for 5 years | 105.37 | 85.14 | 124% |
| Returns for 10 years | 69.82 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...