Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EISDX vs HFQRX
EISDX vs HFQRX Comparison
Open Charts EISDX vs HFQRX
Carillon ClariVest Intl Stock C
Price$28.12
Change+$0.18 (+0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets734.11M
Janus Henderson Global Equity Income N
Price$7.08
Change+$0.01 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.44B
EISDX vs HFQRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EISDX vs. HFQRX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EISDX is a Buy and HFQRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HFQRX has more cash in the bank: 6.44B vs. EISDX (734M). HFQRX pays higher dividends than EISDX: HFQRX (7.40) vs EISDX (1.64). EISDX was incepted earlier than HFQRX: EISDX (13 years) vs HFQRX (10 years). EISDX (1.99) is less costly to investors than HFQRX (0.70). HFQRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 155.00 vs. EISDX (23.00). EISDX has a lower initial minimum investment than HFQRX: EISDX (1000) vs HFQRX (1000000). HFQRX (19.26) and EISDX (19.23) have marching annual gain over last year. EISDX return over 5 years is better than : 81.53 vs. HFQRX (69.86).
| EISDX | HFQRX | EISDX / HFQRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.99 | 0.70 | 284% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.99 | 0.70 | 284% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.383 | 22.158 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 734M | 6.44B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.64 | 7.40 | 22% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.23 | 19.26 | 100% |
| Returns for 3 years | 70.34 | 52.08 | 135% |
| Returns for 5 years | 81.53 | 69.86 | 117% |
| Returns for 10 years | 93.11 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement