Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EISIX vs HFQRX
EISIX vs HFQRX Comparison
Open Charts EISIX vs HFQRX
Carillon ClariVest Intl Stock I
Price$30.73
Change-$0.33 (-1.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets836.91M
Janus Henderson Global Equity Income N
Price$7.01
Change-$0.06 (-0.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.7B
EISIX vs HFQRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EISIX vs. HFQRX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EISIX is a Hold and HFQRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HFQRX has more cash in the bank: 6.7B vs. EISIX (837M). HFQRX pays higher dividends than EISIX: HFQRX (7.24) vs EISIX (2.20). EISIX was incepted earlier than HFQRX: EISIX (13 years) vs HFQRX (10 years). EISIX (1.02) is less costly to investors than HFQRX (0.70). HFQRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 155.00 vs. EISIX (23.00). EISIX has a lower initial minimum investment than HFQRX: EISIX (10000) vs HFQRX (1000000). EISIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.77 vs. HFQRX (21.39). EISIX return over 5 years is better than : 96.03 vs. HFQRX (61.04).
| EISIX | HFQRX | EISIX / HFQRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.70 | 140% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.70 | 146% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 32.396 | 22.942 | 141% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 1000000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 837M | 6.7B | 12% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.20 | 7.24 | 30% |
| Returns for 1 year | 30.77 | 21.39 | 144% |
| Returns for 3 years | 82.03 | 46.60 | 176% |
| Returns for 5 years | 96.03 | 61.04 | 157% |
| Returns for 10 years | 124.30 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement