Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EIVAX vs RMFCX
EIVAX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts EIVAX vs RMFCX
Allspring Special Large Cap Value A
Price$14.06
Change-$0.11 (-0.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.73B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$57.52
Change-$0.44 (-0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.76B
EIVAX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EIVAX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EIVAX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 106B vs. EIVAX (1.73B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than EIVAX: RMFCX (1.31) vs EIVAX (0.65). EIVAX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: EIVAX (19 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). EIVAX (1.16) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). EIVAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than EIVAX: RMFCX (250) vs EIVAX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.70 vs. EIVAX (5.47). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 59.85 vs. EIVAX (32.03).
| EIVAX | RMFCX | EIVAX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.91 | 90% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 0.91 | 127% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.354 | 6.021 | 106% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.73B | 106B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.65 | 1.31 | 50% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.47 | 8.70 | 63% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.67 | 28.43 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.03 | 59.85 | 54% |
| Returns for 10 years | 7.61 | 69.75 | 11% |