Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EIVAX vs RMFCX
EIVAX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts EIVAX vs RMFCX
Allspring Special Large Cap Value A
Price$13.59
Change-$0.04 (-0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.55B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$55.88
Change-$0.13 (-0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets103.21B
EIVAX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EIVAX vs. RMFCX commentary
May 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EIVAX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 103B vs. EIVAX (1.56B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than EIVAX: RMFCX (1.37) vs EIVAX (0.68). EIVAX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: EIVAX (19 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). EIVAX (1.16) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). EIVAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than EIVAX: RMFCX (250) vs EIVAX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.22 vs. EIVAX (1.04). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 59.17 vs. EIVAX (34.35).
| EIVAX | RMFCX | EIVAX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.91 | 90% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 0.91 | 127% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.555 | 2.924 | 122% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.56B | 103B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.68 | 1.37 | 49% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.04 | 5.22 | 20% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.10 | 18.48 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.35 | 59.17 | 58% |
| Returns for 10 years | 4.40 | 61.78 | 7% |