Ad is loading...
EIVAX vs RMFCX
EIVAX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts EIVAX vs RMFCX
Allspring Special Large Cap Value A
Price$12.11
Change-$0.19 (-1.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.26B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$50.23
Change-$0.51 (-1.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets93.16B
EIVAX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EIVAX vs. RMFCX commentary
Apr 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EIVAX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 93.2B vs. EIVAX (1.27B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than EIVAX: RMFCX (1.34) vs EIVAX (0.67). EIVAX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: EIVAX (19 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). EIVAX (1.16) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). EIVAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than EIVAX: RMFCX (250) vs EIVAX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.25 vs. EIVAX (-7.67). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 45.42 vs. EIVAX (21.64).
| EIVAX | RMFCX | EIVAX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.91 | 90% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 0.91 | 127% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.959 | -7.697 | 90% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.27B | 93.2B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.67 | 1.34 | 50% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.67 | -4.25 | 180% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.27 | -0.65 | 42% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.64 | 45.42 | 48% |
| Returns for 10 years | -5.17 | 46.29 | -11% |