Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKGCX vs RSLBX
EKGCX vs RSLBX Comparison
Open Charts EKGCX vs RSLBX
Allspring Special Global Small Cap C
Price$20.45
Change-$0.07 (-0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets113.5M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2
Price$61.25
Change+$0.10 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets78.93B
EKGCX vs RSLBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKGCX vs. RSLBX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKGCX is a Hold and RSLBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLBX has more cash in the bank: 78.9B vs. EKGCX (113M). RSLBX pays higher dividends than EKGCX: RSLBX (0.06) vs EKGCX (0.00). EKGCX was incepted earlier than RSLBX: EKGCX (33 years) vs RSLBX (23 years). EKGCX (2.30) is less costly to investors than RSLBX (1.75). EKGCX (32.00) and RSLBX (32.00) have comparable annual turnover. RSLBX has a lower initial minimum investment than EKGCX: RSLBX (250) vs EKGCX (1000). RSLBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.21 vs. EKGCX (-5.76). RSLBX return over 5 years is better than : -3.53 vs. EKGCX (-25.47).
| EKGCX | RSLBX | EKGCX / RSLBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.17 | 1.75 | 124% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.30 | 1.75 | 131% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.487 | 7.463 | -7% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 113M | 78.9B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.06 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.76 | 5.21 | -110% |
| Returns for 3 years | -3.03 | 26.61 | -11% |
| Returns for 5 years | -25.47 | -3.53 | 721% |
| Returns for 10 years | -27.65 | 40.43 | -68% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers