Ad is loading...
EKGCX vs RSLBX
EKGCX vs RSLBX Comparison
Open Charts EKGCX vs RSLBX
Allspring Special Global Small Cap C
Price$19.23
Change-$0.87 (-4.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets117.96M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2
Price$51.57
Change-$2.46 (-4.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets69.74B
EKGCX vs RSLBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKGCX vs. RSLBX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKGCX is a Hold and RSLBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLBX has more cash in the bank: 69.7B vs. EKGCX (118M). RSLBX pays higher dividends than EKGCX: RSLBX (0.02) vs EKGCX (0.00). EKGCX was incepted earlier than RSLBX: EKGCX (32 years) vs RSLBX (23 years). EKGCX (2.30) is less costly to investors than RSLBX (1.75). EKGCX (32.00) and RSLBX (32.00) have comparable annual turnover. RSLBX has a lower initial minimum investment than EKGCX: RSLBX (250) vs EKGCX (1000). RSLBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.77 vs. EKGCX (-7.88). RSLBX return over 5 years is better than : 42.96 vs. EKGCX (5.29).
| EKGCX | RSLBX | EKGCX / RSLBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.22 | 1.75 | 127% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.30 | 1.75 | 131% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.190 | -5.244 | 42% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 118M | 69.7B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.02 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.88 | -5.77 | 137% |
| Returns for 3 years | -15.55 | -8.08 | 192% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.29 | 42.96 | 12% |
| Returns for 10 years | -32.92 | 19.93 | -165% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers