Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKGCX vs RSLFX
EKGCX vs RSLFX Comparison
Open Charts EKGCX vs RSLFX
Allspring Special Global Small Cap C
Price$21.33
Change+$0.02 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets120.98M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R5
Price$79.22
Change+$0.57 (+0.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets80.82B
EKGCX vs RSLFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKGCX vs. RSLFX commentary
Sep 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKGCX is a Buy and RSLFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLFX has more cash in the bank: 80.8B vs. EKGCX (121M). RSLFX pays higher dividends than EKGCX: RSLFX (0.83) vs EKGCX (0.00). EKGCX was incepted earlier than RSLFX: EKGCX (33 years) vs RSLFX (23 years). EKGCX (2.30) is less costly to investors than RSLFX (0.70). EKGCX (32.00) and RSLFX (32.00) have comparable annual turnover. RSLFX has a lower initial minimum investment than EKGCX: RSLFX (250) vs EKGCX (1000). RSLFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.70 vs. EKGCX (-1.39). RSLFX return over 5 years is better than : 20.11 vs. EKGCX (-14.55).
| EKGCX | RSLFX | EKGCX / RSLFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.22 | 0.70 | 317% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.30 | 0.70 | 329% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.698 | 11.946 | 31% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 121M | 80.8B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.83 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.39 | 12.70 | -11% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.72 | 37.83 | 23% |
| Returns for 5 years | -14.55 | 20.11 | -72% |
| Returns for 10 years | -23.96 | 68.11 | -35% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement