Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKGCX vs RSLFX
EKGCX vs RSLFX Comparison
Open Charts EKGCX vs RSLFX
Allspring Special Global Small Cap C
Price$20.90
Change+$0.06 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets120.27M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R5
Price$75.91
Change+$0.24 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets77.9B
EKGCX vs RSLFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKGCX vs. RSLFX commentary
Jun 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKGCX is a Hold and RSLFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLFX has more cash in the bank: 77.9B vs. EKGCX (120M). RSLFX pays higher dividends than EKGCX: RSLFX (0.88) vs EKGCX (0.00). EKGCX was incepted earlier than RSLFX: EKGCX (32 years) vs RSLFX (23 years). EKGCX (2.30) is less costly to investors than RSLFX (0.70). EKGCX (32.00) and RSLFX (32.00) have comparable annual turnover. RSLFX has a lower initial minimum investment than EKGCX: RSLFX (250) vs EKGCX (1000). RSLFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.68 vs. EKGCX (-1.88). RSLFX return over 5 years is better than : 25.94 vs. EKGCX (-8.44).
| EKGCX | RSLFX | EKGCX / RSLFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.22 | 0.70 | 317% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.30 | 0.70 | 329% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.411 | 7.268 | 19% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 120M | 77.9B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.88 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.88 | 9.68 | -19% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.61 | 32.82 | 5% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.44 | 25.94 | -33% |
| Returns for 10 years | -30.08 | 49.91 | -60% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement