Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKGCX vs RSLFX
EKGCX vs RSLFX Comparison
Open Charts EKGCX vs RSLFX
Allspring Special Global Small Cap C
Price$20.44
Change+$0.14 (+0.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets117.14M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R5
Price$73.54
Change+$0.48 (+0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.3B
EKGCX vs RSLFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKGCX vs. RSLFX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKGCX is a Buy and RSLFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLFX has more cash in the bank: 75.3B vs. EKGCX (117M). RSLFX pays higher dividends than EKGCX: RSLFX (0.88) vs EKGCX (0.00). EKGCX was incepted earlier than RSLFX: EKGCX (32 years) vs RSLFX (23 years). EKGCX (2.30) is less costly to investors than RSLFX (0.70). EKGCX (32.00) and RSLFX (32.00) have comparable annual turnover. RSLFX has a lower initial minimum investment than EKGCX: RSLFX (250) vs EKGCX (1000). RSLFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.09 vs. EKGCX (-6.45). RSLFX return over 5 years is better than : 20.05 vs. EKGCX (-17.71).
| EKGCX | RSLFX | EKGCX / RSLFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.22 | 0.70 | 317% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.30 | 0.70 | 329% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.217 | 3.885 | -31% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 117M | 75.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.88 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.45 | 5.09 | -127% |
| Returns for 3 years | -9.58 | 17.71 | -54% |
| Returns for 5 years | -17.71 | 20.05 | -88% |
| Returns for 10 years | -31.87 | 46.20 | -69% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers