Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKGCX vs RSLFX
EKGCX vs RSLFX Comparison
Open Charts EKGCX vs RSLFX
Allspring Special Global Small Cap C
Price$20.43
Change-$0.13 (-0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets114.96M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R5
Price$78.79
Change-$0.45 (-0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets81.56B
EKGCX vs RSLFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKGCX vs. RSLFX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKGCX is a Hold and RSLFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLFX has more cash in the bank: 81.6B vs. EKGCX (115M). RSLFX pays higher dividends than EKGCX: RSLFX (0.83) vs EKGCX (0.00). EKGCX was incepted earlier than RSLFX: EKGCX (33 years) vs RSLFX (23 years). EKGCX (2.30) is less costly to investors than RSLFX (0.70). EKGCX (32.00) and RSLFX (32.00) have comparable annual turnover. RSLFX has a lower initial minimum investment than EKGCX: RSLFX (250) vs EKGCX (1000). RSLFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.60 vs. EKGCX (-6.97). RSLFX return over 5 years is better than : 10.61 vs. EKGCX (-20.40).
| EKGCX | RSLFX | EKGCX / RSLFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.17 | 0.70 | 310% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.30 | 0.70 | 329% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.049 | 11.338 | 0% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 115M | 81.6B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.83 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.97 | 6.60 | -106% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.71 | 44.18 | 22% |
| Returns for 5 years | -20.40 | 10.61 | -192% |
| Returns for 10 years | -27.49 | 68.53 | -40% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers