Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKGCX vs RSLFX
EKGCX vs RSLFX Comparison
Open Charts EKGCX vs RSLFX
Allspring Special Global Small Cap C
Price$20.98
Change-$0.18 (-0.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets121.81M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R5
Price$77.19
Change-$0.48 (-0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets79.78B
EKGCX vs RSLFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKGCX vs. RSLFX commentary
Jul 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKGCX is a Hold and RSLFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLFX has more cash in the bank: 79.8B vs. EKGCX (122M). RSLFX pays higher dividends than EKGCX: RSLFX (0.86) vs EKGCX (0.00). EKGCX was incepted earlier than RSLFX: EKGCX (33 years) vs RSLFX (23 years). EKGCX (2.30) is less costly to investors than RSLFX (0.70). EKGCX (32.00) and RSLFX (32.00) have comparable annual turnover. RSLFX has a lower initial minimum investment than EKGCX: RSLFX (250) vs EKGCX (1000). RSLFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.91 vs. EKGCX (-5.45). RSLFX return over 5 years is better than : 19.68 vs. EKGCX (-12.78).
| EKGCX | RSLFX | EKGCX / RSLFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.22 | 0.70 | 317% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.30 | 0.70 | 329% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.968 | 9.755 | 30% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 122M | 79.8B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.86 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.45 | 8.91 | -61% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.76 | 27.82 | -6% |
| Returns for 5 years | -12.78 | 19.68 | -65% |
| Returns for 10 years | -28.35 | 54.16 | -52% |