Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKGCX vs RSLFX
EKGCX vs RSLFX Comparison
Open Charts EKGCX vs RSLFX
Allspring Special Global Small Cap C
Price$20.45
Change-$0.07 (-0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets113.5M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R5
Price$76.76
Change+$0.14 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets78.93B
EKGCX vs RSLFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKGCX vs. RSLFX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKGCX is a Hold and RSLFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLFX has more cash in the bank: 78.9B vs. EKGCX (113M). RSLFX pays higher dividends than EKGCX: RSLFX (0.82) vs EKGCX (0.00). EKGCX was incepted earlier than RSLFX: EKGCX (33 years) vs RSLFX (24 years). EKGCX (2.30) is less costly to investors than RSLFX (0.70). EKGCX (32.00) and RSLFX (32.00) have comparable annual turnover. RSLFX has a lower initial minimum investment than EKGCX: RSLFX (250) vs EKGCX (1000). RSLFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.34 vs. EKGCX (-5.76). RSLFX return over 5 years is better than : 3.64 vs. EKGCX (-25.47).
| EKGCX | RSLFX | EKGCX / RSLFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.17 | 0.70 | 310% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.30 | 0.70 | 329% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.487 | 8.469 | -6% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 113M | 78.9B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.82 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.76 | 6.34 | -91% |
| Returns for 3 years | -3.03 | 30.33 | -10% |
| Returns for 5 years | -25.47 | 3.64 | -701% |
| Returns for 10 years | -27.65 | 62.79 | -44% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers