Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKJAX vs RGEBX
EKJAX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts EKJAX vs RGEBX
Allspring Premier Large Co Gr A
Price$12.25
Change-$0.13 (-1.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.44B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$81.95
Change-$0.57 (-0.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.73B
EKJAX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKJAX vs. RGEBX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKJAX is a Hold and RGEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 330B vs. EKJAX (1.44B). EKJAX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . EKJAX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: EKJAX (28 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). EKJAX (1.15) is less costly to investors than RGEBX (1.09). EKJAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 63.00 vs. RGEBX (25.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than EKJAX: RGEBX (250) vs EKJAX (1000). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.39 vs. EKJAX (-3.58). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 29.69 vs. EKJAX (-30.33).
| EKJAX | RGEBX | EKJAX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 1.09 | 101% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 1.09 | 106% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.377 | 14.712 | 105% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.44B | 330B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.58 | 6.39 | -56% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.27 | 59.35 | 32% |
| Returns for 5 years | -30.33 | 29.69 | -102% |
| Returns for 10 years | -22.58 | 80.59 | -28% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement