Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKJAX vs RGEBX
EKJAX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts EKJAX vs RGEBX
Allspring Premier Large Co Gr A
Price$12.08
Change-$0.26 (-2.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.45B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$78.87
Change-$1.33 (-1.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets319.81B
EKJAX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKJAX vs. RGEBX commentary
Aug 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKJAX is a Hold and RGEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 320B vs. EKJAX (1.45B). EKJAX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . EKJAX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: EKJAX (28 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). EKJAX (1.15) is less costly to investors than RGEBX (1.09). EKJAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. RGEBX (25.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than EKJAX: RGEBX (250) vs EKJAX (1000). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.25 vs. EKJAX (9.32). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 39.30 vs. EKJAX (-24.88).
| EKJAX | RGEBX | EKJAX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 1.09 | 101% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 1.09 | 106% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.582 | 10.400 | 121% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.45B | 320B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.32 | 13.25 | 70% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.68 | 44.00 | 11% |
| Returns for 5 years | -24.88 | 39.30 | -63% |
| Returns for 10 years | -25.62 | 73.76 | -35% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement