Ad is loading...
EKJCX vs GFACX
EKJCX vs GFACX Comparison
Open Charts EKJCX vs GFACX
Allspring Premier Large Co Gr C
Price$2.39
Change-$0.16 (-6.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.23B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$57.16
Change-$3.41 (-5.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets279.82B
EKJCX vs GFACX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKJCX vs. GFACX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKJCX is a Hold and GFACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 280B vs. EKJCX (1.23B). EKJCX (0.00) and GFACX (0.00) have matching dividends . EKJCX was incepted earlier than GFACX: EKJCX (27 years) vs GFACX (24 years). EKJCX (1.90) is less costly to investors than GFACX (1.36). EKJCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than EKJCX: GFACX (250) vs EKJCX (1000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.75 vs. EKJCX (-38.55). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 59.73 vs. EKJCX (-67.14).
| EKJCX | GFACX | EKJCX / GFACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.85 | 1.36 | 136% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 1.36 | 140% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.929 | -5.003 | 178% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.23B | 280B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -38.55 | -1.75 | 2,201% |
| Returns for 3 years | -66.88 | 0.63 | -10,594% |
| Returns for 5 years | -67.14 | 59.73 | -112% |
| Returns for 10 years | -81.77 | 44.46 | -184% |