Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKJCX vs RGAGX
EKJCX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts EKJCX vs RGAGX
Allspring Premier Large Co Gr C
Price$3.33
Change-$0.01 (-0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.52B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
Price$88.92
Change-$0.58 (-0.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets342.85B
EKJCX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKJCX vs. RGAGX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKJCX is a Buy and RGAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 343B vs. EKJCX (1.52B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than EKJCX: RGAGX (0.58) vs EKJCX (0.00). EKJCX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: EKJCX (28 years) vs RGAGX (16 years). EKJCX (1.90) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.30). EKJCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. RGAGX (25.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than EKJCX: RGAGX (250) vs EKJCX (1000). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.55 vs. EKJCX (-27.71). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 44.77 vs. EKJCX (-72.46).
| EKJCX | RGAGX | EKJCX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.85 | 0.30 | 617% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 0.30 | 633% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.286 | 19.276 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.52B | 343B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.58 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -27.71 | 15.55 | -178% |
| Returns for 3 years | -42.51 | 76.14 | -56% |
| Returns for 5 years | -72.46 | 44.77 | -162% |
| Returns for 10 years | -75.24 | 106.84 | -70% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement