Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKJCX vs RGAGX
EKJCX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts EKJCX vs RGAGX
Allspring Premier Large Co Gr C
Price$3.23
Change+$0.01 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.45B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
Price$86.57
Change+$0.46 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.37B
EKJCX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKJCX vs. RGAGX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKJCX is a Hold and RGAGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 327B vs. EKJCX (1.45B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than EKJCX: RGAGX (0.56) vs EKJCX (0.00). EKJCX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: EKJCX (28 years) vs RGAGX (17 years). EKJCX (1.90) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.30). EKJCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 63.00 vs. RGAGX (25.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than EKJCX: RGAGX (250) vs EKJCX (1000). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.34 vs. EKJCX (-35.14). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 35.91 vs. EKJCX (-74.28).
| EKJCX | RGAGX | EKJCX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.85 | 0.30 | 617% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 0.30 | 633% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.357 | 16.123 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.45B | 327B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.56 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -35.14 | 7.34 | -479% |
| Returns for 3 years | -45.44 | 64.06 | -71% |
| Returns for 5 years | -74.28 | 35.91 | -207% |
| Returns for 10 years | -76.90 | 92.33 | -83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement