Ad is loading...
EKSDX vs HBLAX
EKSDX vs HBLAX Comparison
Open Charts EKSDX vs HBLAX
Allspring Diversified Income Bldr Adm
Price$5.71
Change+$0.08 (+1.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets323.11M
Hartford Balanced Income A
Price$14.02
Change+$0.36 (+2.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.26B
EKSDX vs HBLAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKSDX vs. HBLAX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKSDX is a Buy and HBLAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLAX has more cash in the bank: 11.3B vs. EKSDX (323M). EKSDX pays higher dividends than HBLAX: EKSDX (5.80) vs HBLAX (3.37). EKSDX was incepted earlier than HBLAX: EKSDX (15 years) vs HBLAX (19 years). EKSDX (1.12) is less costly to investors than HBLAX (0.89). EKSDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 67.00 vs. HBLAX (61.00). HBLAX has a lower initial minimum investment than EKSDX: HBLAX (2000) vs EKSDX (1000000). EKSDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.22 vs. HBLAX (-1.74). EKSDX return over 5 years is better than : 31.15 vs. HBLAX (13.46).
| EKSDX | HBLAX | EKSDX / HBLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.89 | 99% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 0.89 | 126% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.766 | -2.817 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 2000 | - |
| Net Assets | 323M | 11.3B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.80 | 3.37 | 172% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.22 | -1.74 | -185% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.64 | -1.08 | -1,083% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.15 | 13.46 | 231% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.92 | 25.85 | 139% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers