Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKWAX vs FEGIX
EKWAX vs FEGIX Comparison
Open Charts EKWAX vs FEGIX
Allspring Precious Metals A
Price$111.52
Change+$2.69 (+2.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets881.62M
EKWAX vs FEGIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKWAX vs. FEGIX commentary
Sep 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKWAX is a Buy and FEGIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FEGIX has more cash in the bank: 4.33B vs. EKWAX (882M). FEGIX pays higher dividends than EKWAX: FEGIX (3.14) vs EKWAX (0.44). EKWAX was incepted earlier than FEGIX: EKWAX (28 years) vs FEGIX (22 years). EKWAX (1.17) is less costly to investors than FEGIX (0.93). FEGIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.97 vs. EKWAX (14.00). EKWAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FEGIX: EKWAX (1000) vs FEGIX (1000000). EKWAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 89.51 vs. FEGIX (64.32). EKWAX return over 5 years is better than : 90.56 vs. FEGIX (71.58).
| EKWAX | FEGIX | EKWAX / FEGIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.93 | 117% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 0.93 | 126% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 94.722 | 73.053 | 130% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 882M | 4.33B | 20% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.44 | 3.14 | 14% |
| Returns for 1 year | 89.51 | 64.32 | 139% |
| Returns for 3 years | 215.49 | 147.97 | 146% |
| Returns for 5 years | 90.56 | 71.58 | 127% |
| Returns for 10 years | 413.28 | 320.04 | 129% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement