Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKWAX vs FEGIX
EKWAX vs FEGIX Comparison
Open Charts EKWAX vs FEGIX
Allspring Precious Metals A
Price$97.92
Change+$0.84 (+0.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets761.45M
EKWAX vs FEGIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKWAX vs. FEGIX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKWAX is a Hold and FEGIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FEGIX has more cash in the bank: 3.94B vs. EKWAX (761M). FEGIX pays higher dividends than EKWAX: FEGIX (3.67) vs EKWAX (0.54). EKWAX was incepted earlier than FEGIX: EKWAX (28 years) vs FEGIX (22 years). EKWAX (1.19) is less costly to investors than FEGIX (0.93). FEGIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.97 vs. EKWAX (14.00). EKWAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FEGIX: EKWAX (1000) vs FEGIX (1000000). EKWAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 72.45 vs. FEGIX (50.02). EKWAX return over 5 years is better than : 71.66 vs. FEGIX (58.71).
| EKWAX | FEGIX | EKWAX / FEGIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.93 | 117% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 0.93 | 128% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 75.201 | 57.672 | 130% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 761M | 3.94B | 19% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.54 | 3.67 | 15% |
| Returns for 1 year | 72.45 | 50.02 | 145% |
| Returns for 3 years | 152.92 | 107.13 | 143% |
| Returns for 5 years | 71.66 | 58.71 | 122% |
| Returns for 10 years | 324.80 | 260.53 | 125% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement