Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKWAX vs FEGOX
EKWAX vs FEGOX Comparison
Open Charts EKWAX vs FEGOX
Allspring Precious Metals A
Price$111.52
Change+$2.69 (+2.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets881.62M
EKWAX vs FEGOX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKWAX vs. FEGOX commentary
Sep 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKWAX is a Buy and FEGOX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FEGOX has more cash in the bank: 4.33B vs. EKWAX (882M). FEGOX pays higher dividends than EKWAX: FEGOX (3.01) vs EKWAX (0.44). EKWAX was incepted earlier than FEGOX: EKWAX (28 years) vs FEGOX (22 years). FEGOX (1.91) is less costly to investors than EKWAX (1.17). FEGOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.97 vs. EKWAX (14.00). EKWAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FEGOX: EKWAX (1000) vs FEGOX (2500). EKWAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 89.51 vs. FEGOX (66.21). EKWAX return over 5 years is better than : 90.56 vs. FEGOX (67.21).
| EKWAX | FEGOX | EKWAX / FEGOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.91 | 57% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 1.91 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 94.722 | 75.570 | 125% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 882M | 4.33B | 20% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.44 | 3.01 | 15% |
| Returns for 1 year | 89.51 | 66.21 | 135% |
| Returns for 3 years | 215.49 | 146.00 | 148% |
| Returns for 5 years | 90.56 | 67.21 | 135% |
| Returns for 10 years | 413.28 | 288.46 | 143% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement