Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKWAX vs FEGOX
EKWAX vs FEGOX Comparison
Open Charts EKWAX vs FEGOX
Allspring Precious Metals A
Price$88.09
Change+$0.17 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets657.48M
EKWAX vs FEGOX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKWAX vs. FEGOX commentary
Jul 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKWAX is a Buy and FEGOX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FEGOX has more cash in the bank: 3.63B vs. EKWAX (657M). FEGOX pays higher dividends than EKWAX: FEGOX (3.45) vs EKWAX (0.53). EKWAX was incepted earlier than FEGOX: EKWAX (27 years) vs FEGOX (22 years). FEGOX (1.91) is less costly to investors than EKWAX (1.19). FEGOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.97 vs. EKWAX (14.00). EKWAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FEGOX: EKWAX (1000) vs FEGOX (2500). EKWAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 59.00 vs. FEGOX (41.14). EKWAX return over 5 years is better than : 61.51 vs. FEGOX (51.25).
| EKWAX | FEGOX | EKWAX / FEGOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.91 | 57% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 1.91 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 57.309 | 45.132 | 127% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 657M | 3.63B | 18% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 3.45 | 15% |
| Returns for 1 year | 59.00 | 41.14 | 143% |
| Returns for 3 years | 133.30 | 87.94 | 152% |
| Returns for 5 years | 61.51 | 51.25 | 120% |
| Returns for 10 years | 250.39 | 177.32 | 141% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers