Ad is loading...
EKWAX vs FEGOX
EKWAX vs FEGOX Comparison
Open Charts EKWAX vs FEGOX
Allspring Precious Metals A
Price$82.49
Change+$0.84 (+1.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets579.12M
EKWAX vs FEGOX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKWAX vs. FEGOX commentary
Apr 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKWAX is a StrongBuy and FEGOX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FEGOX has more cash in the bank: 3.52B vs. EKWAX (579M). FEGOX pays higher dividends than EKWAX: FEGOX (3.84) vs EKWAX (0.63). EKWAX was incepted earlier than FEGOX: EKWAX (27 years) vs FEGOX (22 years). FEGOX (1.91) is less costly to investors than EKWAX (1.19). FEGOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.97 vs. EKWAX (11.00). EKWAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FEGOX: EKWAX (1000) vs FEGOX (2500). EKWAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 64.48 vs. FEGOX (45.45). EKWAX return over 5 years is better than : 90.44 vs. FEGOX (71.94).
| EKWAX | FEGOX | EKWAX / FEGOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.91 | 57% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 1.91 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 46.091 | 41.579 | 111% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 579M | 3.52B | 16% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.63 | 3.84 | 16% |
| Returns for 1 year | 64.48 | 45.45 | 142% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.83 | 37.37 | 112% |
| Returns for 5 years | 90.44 | 71.94 | 126% |
| Returns for 10 years | 188.69 | 145.07 | 130% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...