Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKWAX vs FEGOX
EKWAX vs FEGOX Comparison
Open Charts EKWAX vs FEGOX
Allspring Precious Metals A
Price$97.92
Change+$0.84 (+0.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets761.45M
EKWAX vs FEGOX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKWAX vs. FEGOX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKWAX is a Hold and FEGOX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FEGOX has more cash in the bank: 3.94B vs. EKWAX (761M). FEGOX pays higher dividends than EKWAX: FEGOX (3.51) vs EKWAX (0.54). EKWAX was incepted earlier than FEGOX: EKWAX (28 years) vs FEGOX (22 years). FEGOX (1.91) is less costly to investors than EKWAX (1.19). FEGOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.97 vs. EKWAX (14.00). EKWAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FEGOX: EKWAX (1000) vs FEGOX (2500). EKWAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 72.45 vs. FEGOX (48.59). EKWAX return over 5 years is better than : 71.66 vs. FEGOX (51.46).
| EKWAX | FEGOX | EKWAX / FEGOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.91 | 57% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 1.91 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 75.201 | 56.711 | 133% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 761M | 3.94B | 19% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.54 | 3.51 | 15% |
| Returns for 1 year | 72.45 | 48.59 | 149% |
| Returns for 3 years | 152.92 | 101.08 | 151% |
| Returns for 5 years | 71.66 | 51.46 | 139% |
| Returns for 10 years | 324.80 | 226.36 | 143% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement