Ad is loading...
EKWAX vs FEURX
EKWAX vs FEURX Comparison
Open Charts EKWAX vs FEURX
Allspring Precious Metals A
Price$70.02
Change+$1.53 (+2.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets463.44M
EKWAX vs FEURX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKWAX vs. FEURX commentary
Mar 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKWAX is a StrongBuy and FEURX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FEURX has more cash in the bank: 3.05B vs. EKWAX (463M). FEURX pays higher dividends than EKWAX: FEURX (4.60) vs EKWAX (0.72). EKWAX was incepted earlier than FEURX: EKWAX (27 years) vs FEURX (8 years). EKWAX (1.19) is less costly to investors than FEURX (0.83). FEURX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.97 vs. EKWAX (11.00). FEURX has a lower initial minimum investment than EKWAX: FEURX (0) vs EKWAX (1000). EKWAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 51.50 vs. FEURX (43.30). EKWAX return over 5 years is better than : 132.63 vs. FEURX (119.57).
| EKWAX | FEURX | EKWAX / FEURX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.83 | 131% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 0.83 | 143% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.544 | 25.466 | 89% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 463M | 3.05B | 15% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.72 | 4.60 | 16% |
| Returns for 1 year | 51.50 | 43.30 | 119% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.14 | 34.71 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 132.63 | 119.57 | 111% |
| Returns for 10 years | 158.73 | N/A | - |