Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKWAX vs FEURX
EKWAX vs FEURX Comparison
Open Charts EKWAX vs FEURX
Allspring Precious Metals A
Price$92.80
Change+$1.59 (+1.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets669.9M
EKWAX vs FEURX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKWAX vs. FEURX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKWAX is a Buy and FEURX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FEURX has more cash in the bank: 3.8B vs. EKWAX (670M). FEURX pays higher dividends than EKWAX: FEURX (3.76) vs EKWAX (0.55). EKWAX was incepted earlier than FEURX: EKWAX (27 years) vs FEURX (8 years). EKWAX (1.19) is less costly to investors than FEURX (0.83). FEURX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.97 vs. EKWAX (11.00). FEURX has a lower initial minimum investment than EKWAX: FEURX (0) vs EKWAX (1000). EKWAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 88.26 vs. FEURX (62.86). EKWAX return over 5 years is better than : 98.57 vs. FEURX (85.98).
| EKWAX | FEURX | EKWAX / FEURX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.83 | 131% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 0.83 | 143% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 66.040 | 53.217 | 124% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 670M | 3.8B | 18% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.55 | 3.76 | 15% |
| Returns for 1 year | 88.26 | 62.86 | 140% |
| Returns for 3 years | 120.94 | 88.52 | 137% |
| Returns for 5 years | 98.57 | 85.98 | 115% |
| Returns for 10 years | 239.83 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers