Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKWAX vs FEURX
EKWAX vs FEURX Comparison
Open Charts EKWAX vs FEURX
Allspring Precious Metals A
Price$87.92
Change+$0.87 (+1.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets657.48M
EKWAX vs FEURX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKWAX vs. FEURX commentary
Jul 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKWAX is a Buy and FEURX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FEURX has more cash in the bank: 3.63B vs. EKWAX (657M). FEURX pays higher dividends than EKWAX: FEURX (3.67) vs EKWAX (0.53). EKWAX was incepted earlier than FEURX: EKWAX (27 years) vs FEURX (8 years). EKWAX (1.19) is less costly to investors than FEURX (0.83). FEURX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.97 vs. EKWAX (14.00). FEURX has a lower initial minimum investment than EKWAX: FEURX (0) vs EKWAX (1000). EKWAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 61.90 vs. FEURX (44.84). EKWAX (59.91) and FEURX (58.16) have equivalent 5 years return.
| EKWAX | FEURX | EKWAX / FEURX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.83 | 131% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 0.83 | 143% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 55.752 | 45.032 | 124% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 657M | 3.63B | 18% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 3.67 | 14% |
| Returns for 1 year | 61.90 | 44.84 | 138% |
| Returns for 3 years | 128.46 | 90.99 | 141% |
| Returns for 5 years | 59.91 | 58.16 | 103% |
| Returns for 10 years | 246.16 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement