Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKWAX vs FEURX
EKWAX vs FEURX Comparison
Open Charts EKWAX vs FEURX
Allspring Precious Metals A
Price$111.52
Change+$2.69 (+2.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets881.62M
EKWAX vs FEURX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKWAX vs. FEURX commentary
Sep 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKWAX is a Buy and FEURX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FEURX has more cash in the bank: 4.33B vs. EKWAX (882M). FEURX pays higher dividends than EKWAX: FEURX (3.19) vs EKWAX (0.44). EKWAX was incepted earlier than FEURX: EKWAX (28 years) vs FEURX (9 years). EKWAX (1.17) is less costly to investors than FEURX (0.83). FEURX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.97 vs. EKWAX (14.00). FEURX has a lower initial minimum investment than EKWAX: FEURX (0) vs EKWAX (1000). EKWAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 89.51 vs. FEURX (64.47). EKWAX return over 5 years is better than : 90.56 vs. FEURX (72.33).
| EKWAX | FEURX | EKWAX / FEURX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.83 | 131% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 0.83 | 141% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 94.722 | 73.163 | 129% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 882M | 4.33B | 20% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.44 | 3.19 | 14% |
| Returns for 1 year | 89.51 | 64.47 | 139% |
| Returns for 3 years | 215.49 | 148.69 | 145% |
| Returns for 5 years | 90.56 | 72.33 | 125% |
| Returns for 10 years | 413.28 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement