Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKWAX vs FEURX
EKWAX vs FEURX Comparison
Open Charts EKWAX vs FEURX
Allspring Precious Metals A
Price$97.92
Change+$0.84 (+0.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets761.45M
EKWAX vs FEURX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKWAX vs. FEURX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKWAX is a Hold and FEURX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FEURX has more cash in the bank: 3.94B vs. EKWAX (761M). FEURX pays higher dividends than EKWAX: FEURX (3.73) vs EKWAX (0.54). EKWAX was incepted earlier than FEURX: EKWAX (28 years) vs FEURX (8 years). EKWAX (1.19) is less costly to investors than FEURX (0.83). FEURX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.97 vs. EKWAX (14.00). FEURX has a lower initial minimum investment than EKWAX: FEURX (0) vs EKWAX (1000). EKWAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 72.45 vs. FEURX (50.23). EKWAX return over 5 years is better than : 71.66 vs. FEURX (59.41).
| EKWAX | FEURX | EKWAX / FEURX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.83 | 131% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 0.83 | 143% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 75.201 | 57.785 | 130% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 761M | 3.94B | 19% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.54 | 3.73 | 15% |
| Returns for 1 year | 72.45 | 50.23 | 144% |
| Returns for 3 years | 152.92 | 107.69 | 142% |
| Returns for 5 years | 71.66 | 59.41 | 121% |
| Returns for 10 years | 324.80 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement