Ad is loading...
EKWAX vs FEURX
EKWAX vs FEURX Comparison
Open Charts EKWAX vs FEURX
Allspring Precious Metals A
Price$82.57
Change-$1.58 (-1.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets599.11M
EKWAX vs FEURX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKWAX vs. FEURX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKWAX is a StrongBuy and FEURX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FEURX has more cash in the bank: 3.54B vs. EKWAX (599M). FEURX pays higher dividends than EKWAX: FEURX (3.86) vs EKWAX (0.57). EKWAX was incepted earlier than FEURX: EKWAX (27 years) vs FEURX (8 years). EKWAX (1.19) is less costly to investors than FEURX (0.83). FEURX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.97 vs. EKWAX (11.00). FEURX has a lower initial minimum investment than EKWAX: FEURX (0) vs EKWAX (1000). EKWAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 67.34 vs. FEURX (44.52). EKWAX return over 5 years is better than : 70.09 vs. FEURX (61.04).
| EKWAX | FEURX | EKWAX / FEURX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.83 | 131% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 0.83 | 143% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 50.564 | 39.322 | 129% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 599M | 3.54B | 17% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.57 | 3.86 | 15% |
| Returns for 1 year | 67.34 | 44.52 | 151% |
| Returns for 3 years | 84.31 | 62.40 | 135% |
| Returns for 5 years | 70.09 | 61.04 | 115% |
| Returns for 10 years | 189.72 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers