Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKWAX vs FSAGX
EKWAX vs FSAGX Comparison
Open Charts EKWAX vs FSAGX
Allspring Precious Metals A
Price$128.29
Change+$1.49 (+1.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.1B
EKWAX vs FSAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKWAX vs. FSAGX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKWAX is a Hold and FSAGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSAGX has more cash in the bank: 3.41B vs. EKWAX (1.1B). FSAGX pays higher dividends than EKWAX: FSAGX (1.71) vs EKWAX (0.39). EKWAX was incepted earlier than FSAGX: EKWAX (28 years) vs FSAGX (40 years). EKWAX (1.17) is less costly to investors than FSAGX (0.68). FSAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.00 vs. EKWAX (14.00). FSAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than EKWAX: FSAGX (0) vs EKWAX (1000). EKWAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 115.85 vs. FSAGX (104.71). EKWAX return over 5 years is better than : 151.83 vs. FSAGX (96.79).
| EKWAX | FSAGX | EKWAX / FSAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.68 | 160% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 0.68 | 172% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 40 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 126.874 | 113.873 | 111% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.1B | 3.41B | 32% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.39 | 1.71 | 23% |
| Returns for 1 year | 115.85 | 104.71 | 111% |
| Returns for 3 years | 211.39 | 161.29 | 131% |
| Returns for 5 years | 151.83 | 96.79 | 157% |
| Returns for 10 years | 502.21 | 347.50 | 145% |