Ad is loading...
EKWAX vs FSAGX
EKWAX vs FSAGX Comparison
Open Charts EKWAX vs FSAGX
Allspring Precious Metals A
Price$82.49
Change+$0.84 (+1.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets579.12M
Fidelity Select Gold
Price$36.20
Change+$0.34 (+0.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.93B
EKWAX vs FSAGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKWAX vs. FSAGX commentary
Apr 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKWAX is a StrongBuy and FSAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSAGX has more cash in the bank: 1.93B vs. EKWAX (579M). FSAGX pays higher dividends than EKWAX: FSAGX (2.71) vs EKWAX (0.63). EKWAX was incepted earlier than FSAGX: EKWAX (27 years) vs FSAGX (39 years). EKWAX (1.19) is less costly to investors than FSAGX (0.70). FSAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. EKWAX (11.00). FSAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than EKWAX: FSAGX (0) vs EKWAX (1000). EKWAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 64.48 vs. FSAGX (55.69). EKWAX return over 5 years is better than : 90.44 vs. FSAGX (56.49).
| EKWAX | FSAGX | EKWAX / FSAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.70 | 156% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 0.70 | 170% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 39 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 46.091 | 45.891 | 100% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 579M | 1.93B | 30% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.63 | 2.71 | 23% |
| Returns for 1 year | 64.48 | 55.69 | 116% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.83 | 18.97 | 220% |
| Returns for 5 years | 90.44 | 56.49 | 160% |
| Returns for 10 years | 188.69 | 130.70 | 144% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers