Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKWAX vs FSAGX
EKWAX vs FSAGX Comparison
Open Charts EKWAX vs FSAGX
Allspring Precious Metals A
Price$111.52
Change+$2.69 (+2.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets881.62M
Fidelity Select Gold
Price$47.45
Change+$1.15 (+2.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.85B
EKWAX vs FSAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKWAX vs. FSAGX commentary
Sep 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKWAX is a Buy and FSAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSAGX has more cash in the bank: 2.85B vs. EKWAX (882M). FSAGX pays higher dividends than EKWAX: FSAGX (1.88) vs EKWAX (0.44). EKWAX was incepted earlier than FSAGX: EKWAX (28 years) vs FSAGX (40 years). EKWAX (1.17) is less costly to investors than FSAGX (0.68). FSAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.00 vs. EKWAX (14.00). FSAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than EKWAX: FSAGX (0) vs EKWAX (1000). EKWAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 89.51 vs. FSAGX (78.74). EKWAX return over 5 years is better than : 90.56 vs. FSAGX (52.33).
| EKWAX | FSAGX | EKWAX / FSAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.68 | 160% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 0.68 | 172% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 40 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 94.722 | 88.365 | 107% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 882M | 2.85B | 31% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.44 | 1.88 | 24% |
| Returns for 1 year | 89.51 | 78.74 | 114% |
| Returns for 3 years | 215.49 | 163.14 | 132% |
| Returns for 5 years | 90.56 | 52.33 | 173% |
| Returns for 10 years | 413.28 | 285.60 | 145% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement