Ad is loading...
EKWAX vs FSAGX
EKWAX vs FSAGX Comparison
Open Charts EKWAX vs FSAGX
Allspring Precious Metals A
Price$70.02
Change+$1.53 (+2.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets463.44M
Fidelity Select Gold
Price$31.06
Change+$0.71 (+2.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.57B
EKWAX vs FSAGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKWAX vs. FSAGX commentary
Mar 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKWAX is a StrongBuy and FSAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSAGX has more cash in the bank: 1.57B vs. EKWAX (463M). FSAGX pays higher dividends than EKWAX: FSAGX (3.08) vs EKWAX (0.72). EKWAX was incepted earlier than FSAGX: EKWAX (27 years) vs FSAGX (39 years). EKWAX (1.19) is less costly to investors than FSAGX (0.70). FSAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. EKWAX (11.00). FSAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than EKWAX: FSAGX (0) vs EKWAX (1000). EKWAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 51.50 vs. FSAGX (44.17). EKWAX return over 5 years is better than : 132.63 vs. FSAGX (94.69).
| EKWAX | FSAGX | EKWAX / FSAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.70 | 156% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 0.70 | 170% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 39 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.544 | 23.474 | 96% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 463M | 1.57B | 29% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.72 | 3.08 | 23% |
| Returns for 1 year | 51.50 | 44.17 | 117% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.14 | 8.99 | 369% |
| Returns for 5 years | 132.63 | 94.69 | 140% |
| Returns for 10 years | 158.73 | 110.79 | 143% |