Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKWAX vs FSAGX
EKWAX vs FSAGX Comparison
Open Charts EKWAX vs FSAGX
Allspring Precious Metals A
Price$97.92
Change+$0.84 (+0.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets761.45M
Fidelity Select Gold
Price$41.87
Change+$0.27 (+0.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.33B
EKWAX vs FSAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKWAX vs. FSAGX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKWAX is a Hold and FSAGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSAGX has more cash in the bank: 2.33B vs. EKWAX (761M). FSAGX pays higher dividends than EKWAX: FSAGX (2.25) vs EKWAX (0.54). EKWAX was incepted earlier than FSAGX: EKWAX (28 years) vs FSAGX (40 years). EKWAX (1.19) is less costly to investors than FSAGX (0.68). FSAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.00 vs. EKWAX (14.00). FSAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than EKWAX: FSAGX (0) vs EKWAX (1000). EKWAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 72.45 vs. FSAGX (63.41). EKWAX return over 5 years is better than : 71.66 vs. FSAGX (39.28).
| EKWAX | FSAGX | EKWAX / FSAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.68 | 160% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 0.68 | 175% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 40 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 75.201 | 70.342 | 107% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 761M | 2.33B | 33% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.54 | 2.25 | 24% |
| Returns for 1 year | 72.45 | 63.41 | 114% |
| Returns for 3 years | 152.92 | 108.60 | 141% |
| Returns for 5 years | 71.66 | 39.28 | 182% |
| Returns for 10 years | 324.80 | 227.46 | 143% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers