Ad is loading...
EKWAX vs FSAGX
EKWAX vs FSAGX Comparison
Open Charts EKWAX vs FSAGX
Allspring Precious Metals A
Price$82.57
Change-$1.58 (-1.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets599.11M
Fidelity Select Gold
Price$35.74
Change-$0.85 (-2.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.24B
EKWAX vs FSAGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKWAX vs. FSAGX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKWAX is a StrongBuy and FSAGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSAGX has more cash in the bank: 2.24B vs. EKWAX (599M). FSAGX pays higher dividends than EKWAX: FSAGX (2.35) vs EKWAX (0.57). EKWAX was incepted earlier than FSAGX: EKWAX (27 years) vs FSAGX (39 years). EKWAX (1.19) is less costly to investors than FSAGX (0.68). FSAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.00 vs. EKWAX (11.00). FSAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than EKWAX: FSAGX (0) vs EKWAX (1000). EKWAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 67.34 vs. FSAGX (56.43). EKWAX return over 5 years is better than : 70.09 vs. FSAGX (38.37).
| EKWAX | FSAGX | EKWAX / FSAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.68 | 160% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 0.68 | 175% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 39 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 50.564 | 48.861 | 103% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 599M | 2.24B | 27% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.57 | 2.35 | 24% |
| Returns for 1 year | 67.34 | 56.43 | 119% |
| Returns for 3 years | 84.31 | 50.88 | 166% |
| Returns for 5 years | 70.09 | 38.37 | 183% |
| Returns for 10 years | 189.72 | 132.18 | 144% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers