Ad is loading...
Ad is loading...
EKWAX vs FSAGX
EKWAX vs FSAGX Comparison
Open Charts EKWAX vs FSAGX
Allspring Precious Metals A
Price$62.19
Change+$0.62 (+1.01%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
Fidelity Select Gold
Price$27.91
Change+$0.21 (+0.76%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
EKWAX vs FSAGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKWAX vs. FSAGX commentary
Nov 23, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKWAX is a Buy and FSAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSAGX has more cash in the bank: 1.6B vs. EKWAX (374M). FSAGX pays higher dividends than EKWAX: FSAGX (0.97) vs EKWAX (0.00). EKWAX was incepted earlier than FSAGX: EKWAX (27 years) vs FSAGX (39 years). FSAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. EKWAX (9.00). FSAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than EKWAX: FSAGX (0) vs EKWAX (1000). EKWAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 42.60 vs. FSAGX (34.46). EKWAX return over 5 years is better than : 63.39 vs. FSAGX (37.29).
| EKWAX | FSAGX | EKWAX / FSAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 39 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 33.828 | 25.227 | 134% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 374M | 1.6B | 23% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.97 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 42.60 | 34.46 | 124% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.24 | 5.69 | 585% |
| Returns for 5 years | 63.39 | 37.29 | 170% |
| Returns for 10 years | 99.50 | 70.76 | 141% |