Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKWAX vs FSAGX
EKWAX vs FSAGX Comparison
Open Charts EKWAX vs FSAGX
Allspring Precious Metals A
Price$88.09
Change+$0.17 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets657.48M
Fidelity Select Gold
Price$38.15
Change+$0.13 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.36B
EKWAX vs FSAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKWAX vs. FSAGX commentary
Jul 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKWAX is a Buy and FSAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSAGX has more cash in the bank: 2.36B vs. EKWAX (657M). FSAGX pays higher dividends than EKWAX: FSAGX (2.21) vs EKWAX (0.53). EKWAX was incepted earlier than FSAGX: EKWAX (27 years) vs FSAGX (40 years). EKWAX (1.19) is less costly to investors than FSAGX (0.68). FSAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.00 vs. EKWAX (14.00). FSAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than EKWAX: FSAGX (0) vs EKWAX (1000). EKWAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 59.00 vs. FSAGX (52.23). EKWAX return over 5 years is better than : 61.51 vs. FSAGX (33.61).
| EKWAX | FSAGX | EKWAX / FSAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.68 | 160% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 0.68 | 175% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 40 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 57.309 | 54.679 | 105% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 657M | 2.36B | 28% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 2.21 | 24% |
| Returns for 1 year | 59.00 | 52.23 | 113% |
| Returns for 3 years | 133.30 | 93.67 | 142% |
| Returns for 5 years | 61.51 | 33.61 | 183% |
| Returns for 10 years | 250.39 | 174.65 | 143% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement