Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKWAX vs SGGDX
EKWAX vs SGGDX Comparison
Open Charts EKWAX vs SGGDX
Allspring Precious Metals A
Price$111.52
Change+$2.69 (+2.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets881.62M
EKWAX vs SGGDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKWAX vs. SGGDX commentary
Sep 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKWAX is a Buy and SGGDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SGGDX has more cash in the bank: 4.33B vs. EKWAX (882M). SGGDX pays higher dividends than EKWAX: SGGDX (3.12) vs EKWAX (0.44). EKWAX was incepted earlier than SGGDX: EKWAX (28 years) vs SGGDX (32 years). EKWAX (1.17) and SGGDX (1.16) have similar cost to investors . SGGDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.97 vs. EKWAX (14.00). EKWAX initial investment is less costly to investors than SGGDX (5%) vs SGGDX (5%). EKWAX has a lower initial minimum investment than SGGDX: EKWAX (1000) vs SGGDX (2500). EKWAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 89.51 vs. SGGDX (63.92). EKWAX return over 5 years is better than : 90.56 vs. SGGDX (69.61).
| EKWAX | SGGDX | EKWAX / SGGDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.16 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 1.16 | 101% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 94.722 | 72.806 | 130% |
| Front Load | 6% | 5% | 115% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 882M | 4.33B | 20% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.44 | 3.12 | 14% |
| Returns for 1 year | 89.51 | 63.92 | 140% |
| Returns for 3 years | 215.49 | 146.25 | 147% |
| Returns for 5 years | 90.56 | 69.61 | 130% |
| Returns for 10 years | 413.28 | 309.44 | 134% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement