Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKWCX vs FEURX
EKWCX vs FEURX Comparison
Open Charts EKWCX vs FEURX
Allspring Precious Metals C
Price$78.53
Change+$1.12 (+1.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets650.84M
EKWCX vs FEURX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKWCX vs. FEURX commentary
Jun 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKWCX is a StrongBuy and FEURX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FEURX has more cash in the bank: 3.64B vs. EKWCX (651M). FEURX pays higher dividends than EKWCX: FEURX (3.76) vs EKWCX (0.06). EKWCX was incepted earlier than FEURX: EKWCX (27 years) vs FEURX (8 years). EKWCX (1.94) is less costly to investors than FEURX (0.83). FEURX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.97 vs. EKWCX (14.00). FEURX has a lower initial minimum investment than EKWCX: FEURX (0) vs EKWCX (1000). EKWCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 74.90 vs. FEURX (55.46). FEURX return over 5 years is better than : 71.26 vs. EKWCX (67.38).
| EKWCX | FEURX | EKWCX / FEURX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 0.83 | 222% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 0.83 | 234% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 58.303 | 48.344 | 121% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 651M | 3.64B | 18% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.06 | 3.76 | 2% |
| Returns for 1 year | 74.90 | 55.46 | 135% |
| Returns for 3 years | 103.90 | 81.72 | 127% |
| Returns for 5 years | 67.38 | 71.26 | 95% |
| Returns for 10 years | 200.47 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement