Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKWCX vs FEURX
EKWCX vs FEURX Comparison
Open Charts EKWCX vs FEURX
Allspring Precious Metals C
Price$84.54
Change-$0.41 (-0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets755.64M
EKWCX vs FEURX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKWCX vs. FEURX commentary
Aug 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKWCX is a Hold and FEURX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FEURX has more cash in the bank: 3.94B vs. EKWCX (756M). FEURX pays higher dividends than EKWCX: FEURX (3.73) vs EKWCX (0.06). EKWCX was incepted earlier than FEURX: EKWCX (28 years) vs FEURX (8 years). EKWCX (1.94) is less costly to investors than FEURX (0.83). FEURX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.97 vs. EKWCX (14.00). FEURX has a lower initial minimum investment than EKWCX: FEURX (0) vs EKWCX (1000). EKWCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 70.78 vs. FEURX (49.91). EKWCX return over 5 years is better than : 61.73 vs. FEURX (58.14).
| EKWCX | FEURX | EKWCX / FEURX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 0.83 | 222% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 0.83 | 234% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 73.722 | 56.528 | 130% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 756M | 3.94B | 19% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.06 | 3.73 | 2% |
| Returns for 1 year | 70.78 | 49.91 | 142% |
| Returns for 3 years | 142.46 | 106.13 | 134% |
| Returns for 5 years | 61.73 | 58.14 | 106% |
| Returns for 10 years | 277.71 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers