Ad is loading...
EKWCX vs FEURX
EKWCX vs FEURX Comparison
Open Charts EKWCX vs FEURX
Allspring Precious Metals C
Price$58.42
Change-$1.61 (-2.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets440.96M
EKWCX vs FEURX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKWCX vs. FEURX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKWCX is a Hold and FEURX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FEURX has more cash in the bank: 2.94B vs. EKWCX (441M). FEURX pays higher dividends than EKWCX: FEURX (1.17) vs EKWCX (0.00). EKWCX was incepted earlier than FEURX: EKWCX (27 years) vs FEURX (8 years). FEURX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 16.39 vs. EKWCX (9.00). FEURX has a lower initial minimum investment than EKWCX: FEURX (0) vs EKWCX (1000). EKWCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 67.98 vs. FEURX (54.32). FEURX return over 5 years is better than : 58.68 vs. EKWCX (46.64).
| EKWCX | FEURX | EKWCX / FEURX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.468 | 19.338 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 441M | 2.94B | 15% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.17 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 67.98 | 54.32 | 125% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.84 | 36.09 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.64 | 58.68 | 79% |
| Returns for 10 years | 104.13 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...