Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKWCX vs FEURX
EKWCX vs FEURX Comparison
Open Charts EKWCX vs FEURX
Allspring Precious Metals C
Price$74.60
Change+$0.56 (+0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets608.62M
EKWCX vs FEURX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKWCX vs. FEURX commentary
Jun 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKWCX is a Buy and FEURX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FEURX has more cash in the bank: 3.56B vs. EKWCX (609M). FEURX pays higher dividends than EKWCX: FEURX (3.76) vs EKWCX (0.06). EKWCX was incepted earlier than FEURX: EKWCX (27 years) vs FEURX (8 years). EKWCX (1.94) is less costly to investors than FEURX (0.83). FEURX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.97 vs. EKWCX (11.00). FEURX has a lower initial minimum investment than EKWCX: FEURX (0) vs EKWCX (1000). EKWCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 60.03 vs. FEURX (43.67). FEURX return over 5 years is better than : 68.30 vs. EKWCX (63.66).
| EKWCX | FEURX | EKWCX / FEURX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 0.83 | 222% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 0.83 | 234% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 51.411 | 43.548 | 118% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 609M | 3.56B | 17% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.06 | 3.76 | 2% |
| Returns for 1 year | 60.03 | 43.67 | 137% |
| Returns for 3 years | 82.09 | 68.80 | 119% |
| Returns for 5 years | 63.66 | 68.30 | 93% |
| Returns for 10 years | 166.08 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers