Ad is loading...
EKWCX vs FEURX
EKWCX vs FEURX Comparison
Open Charts EKWCX vs FEURX
Allspring Precious Metals C
Price$67.65
Change+$3.04 (+4.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets522.88M
EKWCX vs FEURX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKWCX vs. FEURX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKWCX is a StrongBuy and FEURX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FEURX has more cash in the bank: 3.22B vs. EKWCX (523M). FEURX pays higher dividends than EKWCX: FEURX (4.10) vs EKWCX (0.07). EKWCX was incepted earlier than FEURX: EKWCX (27 years) vs FEURX (8 years). EKWCX (1.94) is less costly to investors than FEURX (0.83). FEURX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.97 vs. EKWCX (11.00). FEURX has a lower initial minimum investment than EKWCX: FEURX (0) vs EKWCX (1000). EKWCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 48.12 vs. FEURX (33.95). FEURX (71.80) and EKWCX (71.62) have equivalent 5 years return.
| EKWCX | FEURX | EKWCX / FEURX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 0.83 | 222% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 0.83 | 234% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 32.127 | 29.083 | 110% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 523M | 3.22B | 16% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 4.10 | 2% |
| Returns for 1 year | 48.12 | 33.95 | 142% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.73 | 31.70 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 71.62 | 71.80 | 100% |
| Returns for 10 years | 143.47 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...