Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKWCX vs FEURX
EKWCX vs FEURX Comparison
Open Charts EKWCX vs FEURX
Allspring Precious Metals C
Price$79.14
Change-$0.93 (-1.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets692.74M
EKWCX vs FEURX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKWCX vs. FEURX commentary
Jul 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKWCX is a Buy and FEURX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FEURX has more cash in the bank: 3.83B vs. EKWCX (693M). FEURX pays higher dividends than EKWCX: FEURX (3.67) vs EKWCX (0.06). EKWCX was incepted earlier than FEURX: EKWCX (28 years) vs FEURX (8 years). EKWCX (1.94) is less costly to investors than FEURX (0.83). FEURX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.97 vs. EKWCX (14.00). FEURX has a lower initial minimum investment than EKWCX: FEURX (0) vs EKWCX (1000). EKWCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 62.96 vs. FEURX (44.50). FEURX return over 5 years is better than : 53.33 vs. EKWCX (48.27).
| EKWCX | FEURX | EKWCX / FEURX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 0.83 | 222% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 0.83 | 234% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 63.742 | 51.504 | 124% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 693M | 3.83B | 18% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.06 | 3.67 | 2% |
| Returns for 1 year | 62.96 | 44.50 | 141% |
| Returns for 3 years | 143.23 | 108.16 | 132% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.27 | 53.33 | 91% |
| Returns for 10 years | 286.15 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers