Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKWDX vs FEGOX
EKWDX vs FEGOX Comparison
Open Charts EKWDX vs FEGOX
Allspring Precious Metals Admin
Price$112.83
Change+$2.73 (+2.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets881.62M
EKWDX vs FEGOX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKWDX vs. FEGOX commentary
Sep 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKWDX is a Buy and FEGOX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FEGOX has more cash in the bank: 4.33B vs. EKWDX (882M). FEGOX pays higher dividends than EKWDX: FEGOX (3.01) vs EKWDX (0.48). EKWDX was incepted earlier than FEGOX: EKWDX (15 years) vs FEGOX (22 years). FEGOX (1.91) is less costly to investors than EKWDX (1.10). FEGOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.97 vs. EKWDX (14.00). FEGOX has a lower initial minimum investment than EKWDX: FEGOX (2500) vs EKWDX (1000000). EKWDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 89.74 vs. FEGOX (66.21). EKWDX return over 5 years is better than : 85.66 vs. FEGOX (67.21).
| EKWDX | FEGOX | EKWDX / FEGOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 1.91 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 1.91 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 94.867 | 75.570 | 126% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 882M | 4.33B | 20% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 3.01 | 16% |
| Returns for 1 year | 89.74 | 66.21 | 136% |
| Returns for 3 years | 210.32 | 146.00 | 144% |
| Returns for 5 years | 85.66 | 67.21 | 127% |
| Returns for 10 years | 399.67 | 288.46 | 139% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement