Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKWDX vs FEURX
EKWDX vs FEURX Comparison
Open Charts EKWDX vs FEURX
Allspring Precious Metals Admin
Price$112.83
Change+$2.73 (+2.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets881.62M
EKWDX vs FEURX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKWDX vs. FEURX commentary
Sep 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKWDX is a Buy and FEURX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FEURX has more cash in the bank: 4.33B vs. EKWDX (882M). FEURX pays higher dividends than EKWDX: FEURX (3.19) vs EKWDX (0.48). EKWDX was incepted earlier than FEURX: EKWDX (15 years) vs FEURX (9 years). EKWDX (1.10) is less costly to investors than FEURX (0.83). FEURX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.97 vs. EKWDX (14.00). FEURX has a lower initial minimum investment than EKWDX: FEURX (0) vs EKWDX (1000000). EKWDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 89.74 vs. FEURX (64.47). EKWDX return over 5 years is better than : 85.66 vs. FEURX (72.33).
| EKWDX | FEURX | EKWDX / FEURX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.83 | 114% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.83 | 133% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 94.867 | 73.163 | 130% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 882M | 4.33B | 20% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 3.19 | 15% |
| Returns for 1 year | 89.74 | 64.47 | 139% |
| Returns for 3 years | 210.32 | 148.69 | 141% |
| Returns for 5 years | 85.66 | 72.33 | 118% |
| Returns for 10 years | 399.67 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement