Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKWDX vs FEURX
EKWDX vs FEURX Comparison
Open Charts EKWDX vs FEURX
Allspring Precious Metals Admin
Price$90.69
Change-$1.20 (-1.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets684.81M
EKWDX vs FEURX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKWDX vs. FEURX commentary
Jul 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKWDX is a Buy and FEURX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FEURX has more cash in the bank: 3.8B vs. EKWDX (685M). FEURX pays higher dividends than EKWDX: FEURX (3.67) vs EKWDX (0.56). EKWDX was incepted earlier than FEURX: EKWDX (15 years) vs FEURX (8 years). EKWDX (1.12) is less costly to investors than FEURX (0.83). FEURX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.97 vs. EKWDX (14.00). FEURX has a lower initial minimum investment than EKWDX: FEURX (0) vs EKWDX (1000000). EKWDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 63.79 vs. FEURX (43.14). FEURX (51.52) and EKWDX (51.01) have equivalent 5 years return.
| EKWDX | FEURX | EKWDX / FEURX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.83 | 114% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 0.83 | 135% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 62.637 | 49.715 | 126% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 685M | 3.8B | 18% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 3.67 | 15% |
| Returns for 1 year | 63.79 | 43.14 | 148% |
| Returns for 3 years | 151.96 | 110.36 | 138% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.01 | 51.52 | 99% |
| Returns for 10 years | 323.79 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement