Ad is loading...
EKWDX vs FGADX
EKWDX vs FGADX Comparison
Open Charts EKWDX vs FGADX
Allspring Precious Metals Admin
Price$82.56
Change+$4.21 (+5.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets548.88M
Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Adv
Price$28.71
Change+$1.98 (+7.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.32B
EKWDX vs FGADX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKWDX vs. FGADX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKWDX is a StrongBuy and FGADX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FGADX has more cash in the bank: 1.32B vs. EKWDX (549M). FGADX pays higher dividends than EKWDX: FGADX (8.85) vs EKWDX (0.67). EKWDX was incepted earlier than FGADX: EKWDX (15 years) vs FGADX (28 years). EKWDX (1.12) is less costly to investors than FGADX (0.67). FGADX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 14.50 vs. EKWDX (11.00). FGADX has a lower initial minimum investment than EKWDX: FGADX (100000) vs EKWDX (1000000). EKWDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 54.11 vs. FGADX (47.77). FGADX return over 5 years is better than : 111.75 vs. EKWDX (85.17).
| EKWDX | FGADX | EKWDX / FGADX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.67 | 142% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 0.67 | 167% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 38.673 | 41.130 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 549M | 1.32B | 42% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.67 | 8.85 | 8% |
| Returns for 1 year | 54.11 | 47.77 | 113% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.19 | 16.79 | 233% |
| Returns for 5 years | 85.17 | 111.75 | 76% |
| Returns for 10 years | 173.01 | 170.16 | 102% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers