Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKWDX vs FGADX
EKWDX vs FGADX Comparison
Open Charts EKWDX vs FGADX
Allspring Precious Metals Admin
Price$93.86
Change+$1.61 (+1.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets669.9M
Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Adv
Price$33.23
Change+$0.34 (+1.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.62B
EKWDX vs FGADX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKWDX vs. FGADX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKWDX is a Buy and FGADX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FGADX has more cash in the bank: 1.62B vs. EKWDX (670M). FGADX pays higher dividends than EKWDX: FGADX (7.69) vs EKWDX (0.59). EKWDX was incepted earlier than FGADX: EKWDX (15 years) vs FGADX (28 years). EKWDX (1.12) is less costly to investors than FGADX (0.67). FGADX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 14.50 vs. EKWDX (11.00). FGADX has a lower initial minimum investment than EKWDX: FGADX (100000) vs EKWDX (1000000). EKWDX (88.51) and FGADX (86.08) have marching annual gain over last year. FGADX return over 5 years is better than : 107.56 vs. EKWDX (93.49).
| EKWDX | FGADX | EKWDX / FGADX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.67 | 142% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 0.67 | 167% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 66.124 | 75.449 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 670M | 1.62B | 41% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.59 | 7.69 | 8% |
| Returns for 1 year | 88.51 | 86.08 | 103% |
| Returns for 3 years | 117.37 | 95.06 | 123% |
| Returns for 5 years | 93.49 | 107.56 | 87% |
| Returns for 10 years | 230.77 | 234.07 | 99% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement