Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKWDX vs FGADX
EKWDX vs FGADX Comparison
Open Charts EKWDX vs FGADX
Allspring Precious Metals Admin
Price$90.69
Change-$1.20 (-1.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets684.81M
Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Adv
Price$32.55
Change-$0.51 (-1.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.63B
EKWDX vs FGADX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKWDX vs. FGADX commentary
Jul 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKWDX is a Buy and FGADX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FGADX has more cash in the bank: 1.63B vs. EKWDX (685M). FGADX pays higher dividends than EKWDX: FGADX (7.58) vs EKWDX (0.56). EKWDX was incepted earlier than FGADX: EKWDX (15 years) vs FGADX (29 years). EKWDX (1.12) is less costly to investors than FGADX (0.67). FGADX (14.50) and EKWDX (14.00) have comparable annual turnover. FGADX has a lower initial minimum investment than EKWDX: FGADX (100000) vs EKWDX (1000000). FGADX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 71.40 vs. EKWDX (63.79). FGADX return over 5 years is better than : 59.77 vs. EKWDX (51.01).
| EKWDX | FGADX | EKWDX / FGADX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.67 | 142% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 0.67 | 167% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 62.637 | 74.551 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 685M | 1.63B | 42% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 7.58 | 7% |
| Returns for 1 year | 63.79 | 71.40 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 151.96 | 134.51 | 113% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.01 | 59.77 | 85% |
| Returns for 10 years | 323.79 | 326.11 | 99% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement