Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKWDX vs FGADX
EKWDX vs FGADX Comparison
Open Charts EKWDX vs FGADX
Allspring Precious Metals Admin
Price$84.49
Change+$1.82 (+2.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets571.44M
Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Adv
Price$29.64
Change+$0.87 (+3.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.4B
EKWDX vs FGADX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKWDX vs. FGADX commentary
May 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKWDX is a Buy and FGADX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FGADX has more cash in the bank: 1.4B vs. EKWDX (571M). FGADX pays higher dividends than EKWDX: FGADX (8.28) vs EKWDX (0.61). EKWDX was incepted earlier than FGADX: EKWDX (15 years) vs FGADX (28 years). EKWDX (1.12) is less costly to investors than FGADX (0.67). FGADX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 14.50 vs. EKWDX (11.00). FGADX has a lower initial minimum investment than EKWDX: FGADX (100000) vs EKWDX (1000000). EKWDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 51.12 vs. FGADX (46.66). FGADX return over 5 years is better than : 73.87 vs. EKWDX (57.83).
| EKWDX | FGADX | EKWDX / FGADX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.67 | 142% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 0.67 | 167% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 46.319 | 51.901 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 571M | 1.4B | 41% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.61 | 8.28 | 7% |
| Returns for 1 year | 51.12 | 46.66 | 110% |
| Returns for 3 years | 76.62 | 52.52 | 146% |
| Returns for 5 years | 57.83 | 73.87 | 78% |
| Returns for 10 years | 174.01 | 172.61 | 101% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement