Ad is loading...
EKWDX vs FSAGX
EKWDX vs FSAGX Comparison
Open Charts EKWDX vs FSAGX
Allspring Precious Metals Admin
Price$61.87
Change-$0.28 (-0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets376.83M
EKWDX vs FSAGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKWDX vs. FSAGX commentary
Jan 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKWDX is a Buy and FSAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSAGX has more cash in the bank: 1.3B vs. EKWDX (377M). FSAGX pays higher dividends than EKWDX: FSAGX (0.97) vs EKWDX (0.00). EKWDX was incepted earlier than FSAGX: EKWDX (15 years) vs FSAGX (39 years). FSAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. EKWDX (9.00). FSAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than EKWDX: FSAGX (0) vs EKWDX (1000000). EKWDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 47.07 vs. FSAGX (38.99). EKWDX return over 5 years is better than : 43.98 vs. FSAGX (22.62).
| EKWDX | FSAGX | EKWDX / FSAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 39 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.504 | 9.439 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 377M | 1.3B | 29% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.97 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 47.07 | 38.99 | 121% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.30 | 11.44 | 308% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.98 | 22.62 | 194% |
| Returns for 10 years | 84.83 | 55.90 | 152% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...