Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKWDX vs FSAGX
EKWDX vs FSAGX Comparison
Open Charts EKWDX vs FSAGX
Allspring Precious Metals Admin
Price$112.83
Change+$2.73 (+2.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets881.62M
Fidelity Select Gold
Price$47.45
Change+$1.15 (+2.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.85B
EKWDX vs FSAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKWDX vs. FSAGX commentary
Sep 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKWDX is a Buy and FSAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSAGX has more cash in the bank: 2.85B vs. EKWDX (882M). FSAGX pays higher dividends than EKWDX: FSAGX (1.88) vs EKWDX (0.48). EKWDX was incepted earlier than FSAGX: EKWDX (15 years) vs FSAGX (40 years). EKWDX (1.10) is less costly to investors than FSAGX (0.68). FSAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.00 vs. EKWDX (14.00). FSAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than EKWDX: FSAGX (0) vs EKWDX (1000000). EKWDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 89.74 vs. FSAGX (78.74). EKWDX return over 5 years is better than : 85.66 vs. FSAGX (52.33).
| EKWDX | FSAGX | EKWDX / FSAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.68 | 140% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.68 | 162% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 40 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 94.867 | 88.365 | 107% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 882M | 2.85B | 31% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 1.88 | 25% |
| Returns for 1 year | 89.74 | 78.74 | 114% |
| Returns for 3 years | 210.32 | 163.14 | 129% |
| Returns for 5 years | 85.66 | 52.33 | 164% |
| Returns for 10 years | 399.67 | 285.60 | 140% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement