Ad is loading...
EKWDX vs FSAGX
EKWDX vs FSAGX Comparison
Open Charts EKWDX vs FSAGX
Allspring Precious Metals Admin
Price$82.56
Change+$4.21 (+5.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets548.88M
Fidelity Select Gold
Price$35.86
Change+$1.95 (+5.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.93B
EKWDX vs FSAGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKWDX vs. FSAGX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKWDX is a StrongBuy and FSAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSAGX has more cash in the bank: 1.93B vs. EKWDX (549M). FSAGX pays higher dividends than EKWDX: FSAGX (2.71) vs EKWDX (0.67). EKWDX was incepted earlier than FSAGX: EKWDX (15 years) vs FSAGX (39 years). EKWDX (1.12) is less costly to investors than FSAGX (0.70). FSAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. EKWDX (11.00). FSAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than EKWDX: FSAGX (0) vs EKWDX (1000000). EKWDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 54.11 vs. FSAGX (44.94). EKWDX return over 5 years is better than : 85.17 vs. FSAGX (57.59).
| EKWDX | FSAGX | EKWDX / FSAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.70 | 136% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 0.70 | 160% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 39 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 38.673 | 37.958 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 549M | 1.93B | 28% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.67 | 2.71 | 25% |
| Returns for 1 year | 54.11 | 44.94 | 120% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.19 | 15.21 | 258% |
| Returns for 5 years | 85.17 | 57.59 | 148% |
| Returns for 10 years | 173.01 | 123.30 | 140% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...