Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKWDX vs FSAGX
EKWDX vs FSAGX Comparison
Open Charts EKWDX vs FSAGX
Allspring Precious Metals Admin
Price$84.49
Change+$1.82 (+2.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets571.44M
Fidelity Select Gold
Price$36.17
Change+$0.82 (+2.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.24B
EKWDX vs FSAGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKWDX vs. FSAGX commentary
May 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKWDX is a Buy and FSAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSAGX has more cash in the bank: 2.24B vs. EKWDX (571M). FSAGX pays higher dividends than EKWDX: FSAGX (2.35) vs EKWDX (0.61). EKWDX was incepted earlier than FSAGX: EKWDX (15 years) vs FSAGX (39 years). EKWDX (1.12) is less costly to investors than FSAGX (0.68). FSAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.00 vs. EKWDX (11.00). FSAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than EKWDX: FSAGX (0) vs EKWDX (1000000). EKWDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 51.12 vs. FSAGX (40.40). EKWDX return over 5 years is better than : 57.83 vs. FSAGX (31.84).
| EKWDX | FSAGX | EKWDX / FSAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.68 | 140% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 0.68 | 165% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 39 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 46.319 | 43.816 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 571M | 2.24B | 26% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.61 | 2.35 | 26% |
| Returns for 1 year | 51.12 | 40.40 | 127% |
| Returns for 3 years | 76.62 | 46.87 | 163% |
| Returns for 5 years | 57.83 | 31.84 | 182% |
| Returns for 10 years | 174.01 | 123.81 | 141% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers