Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKWDX vs FSAGX
EKWDX vs FSAGX Comparison
Open Charts EKWDX vs FSAGX
Allspring Precious Metals Admin
Price$90.69
Change-$1.20 (-1.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets684.81M
Fidelity Select Gold
Price$39.17
Change-$0.62 (-1.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.36B
EKWDX vs FSAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKWDX vs. FSAGX commentary
Jul 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKWDX is a Buy and FSAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSAGX has more cash in the bank: 2.36B vs. EKWDX (685M). FSAGX pays higher dividends than EKWDX: FSAGX (2.21) vs EKWDX (0.56). EKWDX was incepted earlier than FSAGX: EKWDX (15 years) vs FSAGX (40 years). EKWDX (1.12) is less costly to investors than FSAGX (0.68). FSAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.00 vs. EKWDX (14.00). FSAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than EKWDX: FSAGX (0) vs EKWDX (1000000). EKWDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 63.79 vs. FSAGX (57.49). EKWDX return over 5 years is better than : 51.01 vs. FSAGX (28.28).
| EKWDX | FSAGX | EKWDX / FSAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.68 | 140% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 0.68 | 165% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 40 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 62.637 | 61.880 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 685M | 2.36B | 29% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 2.21 | 26% |
| Returns for 1 year | 63.79 | 57.49 | 111% |
| Returns for 3 years | 151.96 | 119.70 | 127% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.01 | 28.28 | 180% |
| Returns for 10 years | 323.79 | 242.89 | 133% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement