Ad is loading...
Ad is loading...
EKWDX vs FSAGX
EKWDX vs FSAGX Comparison
Open Charts EKWDX vs FSAGX
Allspring Precious Metals Admin
Price$62.90
Change+$0.63 (+1.01%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
Fidelity Select Gold
Price$27.91
Change+$0.21 (+0.76%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
EKWDX vs FSAGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKWDX vs. FSAGX commentary
Nov 23, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKWDX is a Buy and FSAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSAGX has more cash in the bank: 1.6B vs. EKWDX (374M). FSAGX pays higher dividends than EKWDX: FSAGX (0.97) vs EKWDX (0.00). EKWDX was incepted earlier than FSAGX: EKWDX (14 years) vs FSAGX (39 years). FSAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. EKWDX (9.00). FSAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than EKWDX: FSAGX (0) vs EKWDX (1000000). EKWDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 42.82 vs. FSAGX (35.48). EKWDX return over 5 years is better than : 59.24 vs. FSAGX (38.33).
| EKWDX | FSAGX | EKWDX / FSAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 39 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 34.001 | 26.177 | 130% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 374M | 1.6B | 23% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.97 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 42.82 | 35.48 | 121% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.12 | 8.41 | 370% |
| Returns for 5 years | 59.24 | 38.33 | 155% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.21 | 65.54 | 144% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...