Ad is loading...
EKWYX vs FSAGX
EKWYX vs FSAGX Comparison
Open Charts EKWYX vs FSAGX
Allspring Precious Metals Inst
Price$61.05
Change+$0.29 (+0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets363.44M
EKWYX vs FSAGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKWYX vs. FSAGX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKWYX is a Buy and FSAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSAGX has more cash in the bank: 1.3B vs. EKWYX (363M). FSAGX pays higher dividends than EKWYX: FSAGX (0.97) vs EKWYX (0.00). EKWYX was incepted earlier than FSAGX: EKWYX (25 years) vs FSAGX (39 years). FSAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. EKWYX (9.00). FSAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than EKWYX: FSAGX (0) vs EKWYX (1000000). EKWYX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 44.24 vs. FSAGX (36.54). EKWYX return over 5 years is better than : 45.83 vs. FSAGX (23.30).
| EKWYX | FSAGX | EKWYX / FSAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 39 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.011 | 7.079 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 363M | 1.3B | 28% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.97 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 44.24 | 36.54 | 121% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.38 | 11.10 | 319% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.83 | 23.30 | 197% |
| Returns for 10 years | 73.77 | 44.94 | 164% |