Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKWYX vs FSAGX
EKWYX vs FSAGX Comparison
Open Charts EKWYX vs FSAGX
Allspring Precious Metals Inst
Price$114.05
Change+$2.75 (+2.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets881.62M
Fidelity Select Gold
Price$47.45
Change+$1.15 (+2.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.85B
EKWYX vs FSAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKWYX vs. FSAGX commentary
Sep 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKWYX is a Buy and FSAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSAGX has more cash in the bank: 2.85B vs. EKWYX (882M). FSAGX pays higher dividends than EKWYX: FSAGX (1.88) vs EKWYX (0.60). EKWYX was incepted earlier than FSAGX: EKWYX (26 years) vs FSAGX (40 years). EKWYX (0.85) is less costly to investors than FSAGX (0.68). FSAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.00 vs. EKWYX (14.00). FSAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than EKWYX: FSAGX (0) vs EKWYX (1000000). EKWYX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 90.06 vs. FSAGX (78.74). EKWYX return over 5 years is better than : 86.85 vs. FSAGX (52.33).
| EKWYX | FSAGX | EKWYX / FSAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.68 | 116% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.68 | 125% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 40 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 95.092 | 88.365 | 108% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 882M | 2.85B | 31% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.60 | 1.88 | 32% |
| Returns for 1 year | 90.06 | 78.74 | 114% |
| Returns for 3 years | 211.75 | 163.14 | 130% |
| Returns for 5 years | 86.85 | 52.33 | 166% |
| Returns for 10 years | 406.46 | 285.60 | 142% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement