Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKWYX vs FSAGX
EKWYX vs FSAGX Comparison
Open Charts EKWYX vs FSAGX
Allspring Precious Metals Inst
Price$84.75
Change-$0.61 (-0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets585.53M
Fidelity Select Gold
Price$35.94
Change-$0.23 (-0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.24B
EKWYX vs FSAGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKWYX vs. FSAGX commentary
May 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKWYX is a Buy and FSAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSAGX has more cash in the bank: 2.24B vs. EKWYX (586M). FSAGX pays higher dividends than EKWYX: FSAGX (2.35) vs EKWYX (0.78). EKWYX was incepted earlier than FSAGX: EKWYX (25 years) vs FSAGX (39 years). EKWYX (0.87) is less costly to investors than FSAGX (0.68). FSAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.00 vs. EKWYX (11.00). FSAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than EKWYX: FSAGX (0) vs EKWYX (1000000). EKWYX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 59.79 vs. FSAGX (48.50). EKWYX return over 5 years is better than : 62.32 vs. FSAGX (34.90).
| EKWYX | FSAGX | EKWYX / FSAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.68 | 116% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.68 | 128% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 39 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 49.623 | 47.152 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 586M | 2.24B | 26% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.78 | 2.35 | 33% |
| Returns for 1 year | 59.79 | 48.50 | 123% |
| Returns for 3 years | 80.21 | 49.09 | 163% |
| Returns for 5 years | 62.32 | 34.90 | 179% |
| Returns for 10 years | 183.78 | 129.00 | 142% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement