Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKWYX vs FSAGX
EKWYX vs FSAGX Comparison
Open Charts EKWYX vs FSAGX
Allspring Precious Metals Inst
Price$89.88
Change+$0.90 (+1.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets657.48M
Fidelity Select Gold
Price$38.15
Change+$0.13 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.36B
EKWYX vs FSAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKWYX vs. FSAGX commentary
Jul 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKWYX is a Buy and FSAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSAGX has more cash in the bank: 2.36B vs. EKWYX (657M). FSAGX pays higher dividends than EKWYX: FSAGX (2.21) vs EKWYX (0.71). EKWYX was incepted earlier than FSAGX: EKWYX (25 years) vs FSAGX (40 years). EKWYX (0.87) is less costly to investors than FSAGX (0.68). FSAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.00 vs. EKWYX (14.00). FSAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than EKWYX: FSAGX (0) vs EKWYX (1000000). EKWYX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 62.36 vs. FSAGX (52.23). EKWYX return over 5 years is better than : 56.80 vs. FSAGX (33.61).
| EKWYX | FSAGX | EKWYX / FSAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.68 | 116% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.68 | 128% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 40 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 55.968 | 54.679 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 657M | 2.36B | 28% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.71 | 2.21 | 32% |
| Returns for 1 year | 62.36 | 52.23 | 119% |
| Returns for 3 years | 125.73 | 93.67 | 134% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.80 | 33.61 | 169% |
| Returns for 10 years | 241.43 | 174.65 | 138% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement