Ad is loading...
EKWYX vs FSAGX
EKWYX vs FSAGX Comparison
Open Charts EKWYX vs FSAGX
Allspring Precious Metals Inst
Price$84.31
Change+$1.09 (+1.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets587.35M
Fidelity Select Gold
Price$36.33
Change+$0.44 (+1.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.93B
EKWYX vs FSAGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKWYX vs. FSAGX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKWYX is a Hold and FSAGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSAGX has more cash in the bank: 1.93B vs. EKWYX (587M). FSAGX pays higher dividends than EKWYX: FSAGX (2.71) vs EKWYX (0.85). EKWYX was incepted earlier than FSAGX: EKWYX (25 years) vs FSAGX (39 years). EKWYX (0.87) is less costly to investors than FSAGX (0.70). FSAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. EKWYX (11.00). FSAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than EKWYX: FSAGX (0) vs EKWYX (1000000). EKWYX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 71.35 vs. FSAGX (62.09). EKWYX return over 5 years is better than : 71.88 vs. FSAGX (45.11).
| EKWYX | FSAGX | EKWYX / FSAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.70 | 113% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.70 | 124% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 39 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 50.377 | 50.041 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 587M | 1.93B | 30% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.85 | 2.71 | 31% |
| Returns for 1 year | 71.35 | 62.09 | 115% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.31 | 34.29 | 173% |
| Returns for 5 years | 71.88 | 45.11 | 159% |
| Returns for 10 years | 196.82 | 141.15 | 139% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...