Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKWYX vs FSAGX
EKWYX vs FSAGX Comparison
Open Charts EKWYX vs FSAGX
Allspring Precious Metals Inst
Price$94.84
Change+$1.62 (+1.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets669.9M
Fidelity Select Gold
Price$40.02
Change+$0.70 (+1.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.24B
EKWYX vs FSAGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKWYX vs. FSAGX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKWYX is a Buy and FSAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSAGX has more cash in the bank: 2.24B vs. EKWYX (670M). FSAGX pays higher dividends than EKWYX: FSAGX (2.29) vs EKWYX (0.74). EKWYX was incepted earlier than FSAGX: EKWYX (25 years) vs FSAGX (40 years). EKWYX (0.87) is less costly to investors than FSAGX (0.68). FSAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.00 vs. EKWYX (11.00). FSAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than EKWYX: FSAGX (0) vs EKWYX (1000000). EKWYX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 88.79 vs. FSAGX (75.30). EKWYX return over 5 years is better than : 94.72 vs. FSAGX (63.02).
| EKWYX | FSAGX | EKWYX / FSAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.68 | 116% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.68 | 128% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 40 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 66.240 | 62.815 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 670M | 2.24B | 30% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.74 | 2.29 | 32% |
| Returns for 1 year | 88.79 | 75.30 | 118% |
| Returns for 3 years | 118.31 | 78.85 | 150% |
| Returns for 5 years | 94.72 | 63.02 | 150% |
| Returns for 10 years | 235.23 | 171.21 | 137% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers