Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ELBAX vs OEMNX
ELBAX vs OEMNX Comparison
Open Charts ELBAX vs OEMNX
Ashmore Emerging Mkts Lcl Ccy Bd A
Price$6.66
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.68M
Invesco Emerging Markets Local Debt R
Price$5.45
Change-$0.01 (-0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets85.05M
ELBAX vs OEMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ELBAX vs. OEMNX commentary
Jul 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ELBAX is a Hold and OEMNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OEMNX has more cash in the bank: 85.1M vs. ELBAX (9.68M). OEMNX pays higher dividends than ELBAX: OEMNX (6.53) vs ELBAX (4.47). ELBAX was incepted earlier than OEMNX: ELBAX (14 years) vs OEMNX (15 years). ELBAX (2.62) is less costly to investors than OEMNX (1.76). OEMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 99.00 vs. ELBAX (59.00). ELBAX (1000) and OEMNX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. ELBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.11 vs. OEMNX (9.65). ELBAX return over 5 years is better than : 9.61 vs. OEMNX (6.27).
| ELBAX | OEMNX | ELBAX / OEMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 1.48 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.62 | 1.76 | 149% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.520 | 12.212 | 103% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.68M | 85.1M | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.47 | 6.53 | 68% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.11 | 9.65 | 115% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.49 | 28.54 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.61 | 6.27 | 153% |
| Returns for 10 years | 20.85 | 21.38 | 98% |