Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ELBCX vs OEMNX
ELBCX vs OEMNX Comparison
Open Charts ELBCX vs OEMNX
Ashmore Emerging Mkts Lcl Ccy Bd C
Price$6.50
Change-$0.01 (-0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.85M
Invesco Emerging Markets Local Debt R
Price$5.46
Change-$0.01 (-0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets88.27M
ELBCX vs OEMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ELBCX vs. OEMNX commentary
Sep 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ELBCX is a Hold and OEMNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OEMNX has more cash in the bank: 88.3M vs. ELBCX (9.85M). OEMNX pays higher dividends than ELBCX: OEMNX (5.55) vs ELBCX (3.53). ELBCX was incepted earlier than OEMNX: ELBCX (14 years) vs OEMNX (15 years). ELBCX (3.57) is less costly to investors than OEMNX (1.76). OEMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 99.00 vs. ELBCX (59.00). ELBCX (1000) and OEMNX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. ELBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.88 vs. OEMNX (6.73). ELBCX return over 5 years is better than : 6.14 vs. OEMNX (5.80).
| ELBCX | OEMNX | ELBCX / OEMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.80 | 1.48 | 122% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.57 | 1.76 | 203% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.133 | 12.624 | 112% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.85M | 88.3M | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.53 | 5.55 | 64% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.88 | 6.73 | 117% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.63 | 24.53 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.14 | 5.80 | 106% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.57 | 30.00 | 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement