Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ELBCX vs TRZFX
ELBCX vs TRZFX Comparison
Open Charts ELBCX vs TRZFX
Ashmore Emerging Mkts Lcl Ccy Bd C
Price$6.47
Change+$0.01 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.76M
T. Rowe Price Emerg Mkts Lcl Ccy Bd Z
Price$5.01
Change+$0.01 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets294.63M
ELBCX vs TRZFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRZFX has more cash in the bank: 295M vs. ELBCX (9.76M). TRZFX pays higher dividends than ELBCX: TRZFX (6.91) vs ELBCX (3.62). ELBCX was incepted earlier than TRZFX: ELBCX (14 years) vs TRZFX (4 years). ELBCX (3.57) is less costly to investors than TRZFX (0.77). TRZFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.20 vs. ELBCX (59.00). TRZFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ELBCX: TRZFX (0) vs ELBCX (1000). TRZFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.52 vs. ELBCX (7.40).
| ELBCX | TRZFX | ELBCX / TRZFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.80 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.57 | 0.77 | 464% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 4 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.256 | 14.010 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.76M | 295M | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.62 | 6.91 | 52% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.40 | 9.52 | 78% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.64 | 29.61 | 76% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.63 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 20.31 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement