ELMA
Price
$21.00
Change
-$0.50 (-2.33%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
15.05M
FABP
Price
$40.00
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 1 closing price
Capitalization
78.23M
Interact to see
Advertisement

ELMA vs FABP

Header iconELMA vs FABP Comparison
Open Charts ELMA vs FABPBanner chart's image
Elmer Ban
Price$21.00
Change-$0.50 (-2.33%)
Volume$183
Capitalization15.05M
Farmers Ban
Price$40.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$800
Capitalization78.23M
ELMA vs FABP Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ELMA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FABP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ELMA vs. FABP commentary
Jul 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ELMA is a Buy and FABP is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 04, 2025
Stock price -- (ELMA: $21.00 vs. FABP: $40.00)
Brand notoriety: ELMA and FABP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ELMA: 31% vs. FABP: 55%
Market capitalization -- ELMA: $15.05M vs. FABP: $78.23M
ELMA [@Regional Banks] is valued at $15.05M. FABP’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $78.23M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ELMA’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFABP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ELMA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FABP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both ELMA and FABP are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ELMA’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FABP’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ELMA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FABP’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FABP is a better buy in the short-term than ELMA.

Price Growth

ELMA (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.94% price change this week, while FABP (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.74%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.60%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.77% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FABP($78.2M) has a higher market cap than ELMA($15M). FABP YTD gains are higher at: 6.090 vs. ELMA (-4.090).
ELMAFABPELMA / FABP
Capitalization15M78.2M19%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-4.0906.090-67%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue10.3MN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt675KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ELMA vs FABP: Fundamental Ratings
ELMA
FABP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8850
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
21
Undervalued
44
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2358
SMR RATING
1..100
6457
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5951
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6311
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ELMA's Valuation (21) in the null industry is in the same range as FABP (44). This means that ELMA’s stock grew similarly to FABP’s over the last 12 months.

ELMA's Profit vs Risk Rating (23) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FABP (58). This means that ELMA’s stock grew somewhat faster than FABP’s over the last 12 months.

FABP's SMR Rating (57) in the null industry is in the same range as ELMA (64). This means that FABP’s stock grew similarly to ELMA’s over the last 12 months.

FABP's Price Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as ELMA (59). This means that FABP’s stock grew similarly to ELMA’s over the last 12 months.

FABP's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ELMA (63). This means that FABP’s stock grew somewhat faster than ELMA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ELMAFABP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
41%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
31%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
28%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
11%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
29%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
21%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
25%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
15%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
31%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
22%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
29%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
42%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ELMA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FABP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FNCJF0.070.01
+21.95%
Fancamp Exploration Ltd.
ALSSF2.580.10
+4.03%
Alsea SA
ACRFF53.101.25
+2.41%
Accor SA Ltd.
FBVI28.00N/A
N/A
FCN Banc Corp
BNEFF2.59-0.06
-2.26%
Bonterra Energy Corp.

ELMA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ELMA and KFFB have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ELMA and KFFB's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ELMA
1D Price
Change %
ELMA100%
-2.33%
KFFB - ELMA
24%
Poorly correlated
+2.80%
FRST - ELMA
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.15%
CFIC - ELMA
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VALIF - ELMA
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FUNC - ELMA
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.97%
More

FABP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FABP and FCCT have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FABP and FCCT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FABP
1D Price
Change %
FABP100%
N/A
FCCT - FABP
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SOUB - FABP
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FXLG - FABP
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.38%
EGFEY - FABP
20%
Poorly correlated
+6.25%
ELMA - FABP
6%
Poorly correlated
-2.33%
More