ELMA
Price
$20.60
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Apr 16 closing price
Capitalization
15.05M
FUNC
Price
$28.00
Change
-$0.05 (-0.18%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
152.19M
12 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

ELMA vs FUNC

Header iconELMA vs FUNC Comparison
Open Charts ELMA vs FUNCBanner chart's image
Elmer Ban
Price$20.60
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2.1K
Capitalization15.05M
First United
Price$28.00
Change-$0.05 (-0.18%)
Volume$13.4K
Capitalization152.19M
ELMA vs FUNC Comparison Chart
Loading...
FUNC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ELMA vs. FUNC commentary
Apr 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ELMA is a Hold and FUNC is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 19, 2025
Stock price -- (ELMA: $20.60 vs. FUNC: $28.00)
Brand notoriety: ELMA and FUNC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ELMA: 173% vs. FUNC: 55%
Market capitalization -- ELMA: $15.05M vs. FUNC: $152.19M
ELMA [@Regional Banks] is valued at $15.05M. FUNC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $152.19M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.96B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ELMA’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFUNC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • ELMA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FUNC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, ELMA is a better buy in the long-term than FUNC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FUNC’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • FUNC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.

Price Growth

ELMA (@Regional Banks) experienced а -6.75% price change this week, while FUNC (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.42% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +3.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.67%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.79%.

Reported Earning Dates

FUNC is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+3.08% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FUNC($152M) has a higher market cap than ELMA($15M). ELMA YTD gains are higher at: -5.916 vs. FUNC (-15.721). ELMA has less debt than FUNC: ELMA (675K) vs FUNC (112M). FUNC has higher revenues than ELMA: FUNC (71.3M) vs ELMA (10.3M).
ELMAFUNCELMA / FUNC
Capitalization15M152M10%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-5.916-15.72138%
P/E RatioN/A10.14-
Revenue10.3M71.3M14%
Total CashN/A86.9M-
Total Debt675K112M1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ELMA vs FUNC: Fundamental Ratings
ELMA
FUNC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8815
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
27
Undervalued
46
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1132
SMR RATING
1..100
4316
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5657
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4555
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
34n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ELMA's Valuation (27) in the null industry is in the same range as FUNC (46) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that ELMA’s stock grew similarly to FUNC’s over the last 12 months.

ELMA's Profit vs Risk Rating (11) in the null industry is in the same range as FUNC (32) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that ELMA’s stock grew similarly to FUNC’s over the last 12 months.

FUNC's SMR Rating (16) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as ELMA (43) in the null industry. This means that FUNC’s stock grew similarly to ELMA’s over the last 12 months.

ELMA's Price Growth Rating (56) in the null industry is in the same range as FUNC (57) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that ELMA’s stock grew similarly to FUNC’s over the last 12 months.

ELMA's P/E Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as FUNC (55) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that ELMA’s stock grew similarly to FUNC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FUNC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
54%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FUNC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DTCAX16.09N/A
N/A
BNY Mellon Sust US Equity A
MAILX18.93N/A
N/A
BlackRock International Instl
HLMOX7.71N/A
N/A
Harding Loevner Frontier Emerg Mkts Inv
PSUYX11.50N/A
N/A
Victory Pioneer Global Value Y
JCNRX22.28-0.10
-0.45%
Janus Henderson Contrarian R

ELMA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ELMA and KFFB have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ELMA and KFFB's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ELMA
1D Price
Change %
ELMA100%
N/A
KFFB - ELMA
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.45%
FRST - ELMA
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.49%
CFIC - ELMA
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VALIF - ELMA
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FUNC - ELMA
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.61%
More

FUNC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FUNC has been loosely correlated with ONB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FUNC jumps, then ONB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FUNC
1D Price
Change %
FUNC100%
+0.61%
ONB - FUNC
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.67%
EFSC - FUNC
64%
Loosely correlated
+1.14%
SHBI - FUNC
64%
Loosely correlated
+1.30%
UCB - FUNC
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.57%
PNFP - FUNC
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.38%
More