ELMA
Price
$22.21
Change
+$0.06 (+0.27%)
Updated
Sep 29 closing price
Capitalization
25.42M
FUNC
Price
$36.63
Change
-$0.09 (-0.25%)
Updated
Sep 30, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
247.57M
26 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

ELMA vs FUNC

Header iconELMA vs FUNC Comparison
Open Charts ELMA vs FUNCBanner chart's image
Elmer Ban
Price$22.21
Change+$0.06 (+0.27%)
Volume$100
Capitalization25.42M
First United
Price$36.63
Change-$0.09 (-0.25%)
Volume$100
Capitalization247.57M
ELMA vs FUNC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ELMA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FUNC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ELMA vs. FUNC commentary
Oct 01, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ELMA is a StrongBuy and FUNC is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 01, 2025
Stock price -- (ELMA: $22.21 vs. FUNC: $36.72)
Brand notoriety: ELMA and FUNC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ELMA: 11% vs. FUNC: 75%
Market capitalization -- ELMA: $25.42M vs. FUNC: $238.81M
ELMA [@Regional Banks] is valued at $25.42M. FUNC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $238.81M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $164.73B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.87B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ELMA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFUNC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ELMA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FUNC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FUNC is a better buy in the long-term than ELMA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ELMA’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FUNC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ELMA’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FUNC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ELMA is a better buy in the short-term than FUNC.

Price Growth

ELMA (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.95% price change this week, while FUNC (@Regional Banks) price change was -2.99% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.74%.

Reported Earning Dates

FUNC is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.40% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FUNC($248M) has a higher market cap than ELMA($25.4M). FUNC has higher P/E ratio than ELMA: FUNC (10.06) vs ELMA (8.88). FUNC YTD gains are higher at: 11.239 vs. ELMA (1.437). ELMA has less debt than FUNC: ELMA (675K) vs FUNC (151M). FUNC has higher revenues than ELMA: FUNC (83.7M) vs ELMA (13.8M).
ELMAFUNCELMA / FUNC
Capitalization25.4M248M10%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD1.43711.23913%
P/E Ratio8.8810.0688%
Revenue13.8M83.7M16%
Total CashN/A82.8M-
Total Debt675K151M0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ELMA vs FUNC: Fundamental Ratings
ELMA
FUNC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8669
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
43
Fair valued
37
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1626
SMR RATING
1..100
6944
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5548
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5278
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FUNC's Valuation (37) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as ELMA (43) in the null industry. This means that FUNC’s stock grew similarly to ELMA’s over the last 12 months.

ELMA's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the null industry is in the same range as FUNC (26) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that ELMA’s stock grew similarly to FUNC’s over the last 12 months.

FUNC's SMR Rating (44) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as ELMA (69) in the null industry. This means that FUNC’s stock grew similarly to ELMA’s over the last 12 months.

FUNC's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as ELMA (55) in the null industry. This means that FUNC’s stock grew similarly to ELMA’s over the last 12 months.

ELMA's P/E Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as FUNC (78) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that ELMA’s stock grew similarly to FUNC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ELMAFUNC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
19%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
31%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
11%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
21%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
55%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
32%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ELMA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FUNC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RADLY3.580.11
+3.03%
Raia Drogasil SA
TSHTY10.60N/A
N/A
Toshiba Tec Corp.
GLFGF0.40N/A
N/A
GLOBAL FASHION GROUP SA
EBKOF100.70N/A
N/A
Erste Group Bank AG
ANICF0.27-0.02
-5.93%
ANONYMOUS INTELLIGENCE CO INC.

ELMA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ELMA and KFFB have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ELMA and KFFB's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ELMA
1D Price
Change %
ELMA100%
+0.27%
KFFB - ELMA
24%
Poorly correlated
-8.36%
FRST - ELMA
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.31%
CFIC - ELMA
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VALIF - ELMA
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FUNC - ELMA
21%
Poorly correlated
-3.67%
More

FUNC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FUNC has been closely correlated with SHBI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FUNC jumps, then SHBI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FUNC
1D Price
Change %
FUNC100%
-3.67%
SHBI - FUNC
69%
Closely correlated
-2.30%
FNB - FUNC
69%
Closely correlated
-0.99%
CWBC - FUNC
69%
Closely correlated
-1.80%
UCB - FUNC
68%
Closely correlated
-1.23%
WTFC - FUNC
68%
Closely correlated
-1.10%
More