ELMA
Price
$21.87
Change
+$0.87 (+4.14%)
Updated
Jul 16 closing price
Capitalization
15.05M
KFFB
Price
$3.10
Change
+$0.11 (+3.68%)
Updated
Jul 17, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
30.89M
Interact to see
Advertisement

ELMA vs KFFB

Header iconELMA vs KFFB Comparison
Open Charts ELMA vs KFFBBanner chart's image
Elmer Ban
Price$21.87
Change+$0.87 (+4.14%)
Volume$208
Capitalization15.05M
Kentucky First Federal Ban
Price$3.10
Change+$0.11 (+3.68%)
Volume$200
Capitalization30.89M
ELMA vs KFFB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ELMA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KFFB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ELMA vs. KFFB commentary
Jul 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ELMA is a Buy and KFFB is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 18, 2025
Stock price -- (ELMA: $21.87 vs. KFFB: $2.99)
Brand notoriety: ELMA and KFFB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ELMA: 34% vs. KFFB: 58%
Market capitalization -- ELMA: $15.05M vs. KFFB: $30.89M
ELMA [@Regional Banks] is valued at $15.05M. KFFB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $30.89M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ELMA’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileKFFB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ELMA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • KFFB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ELMA is a better buy in the long-term than KFFB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ELMA’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KFFB’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ELMA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • KFFB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, KFFB is a better buy in the short-term than ELMA.

Price Growth

ELMA (@Regional Banks) experienced а +4.14% price change this week, while KFFB (@Regional Banks) price change was +2.73% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.74%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.95%.

Reported Earning Dates

KFFB is expected to report earnings on May 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.20% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KFFB($30.9M) has a higher market cap than ELMA($15M). KFFB YTD gains are higher at: 0.204 vs. ELMA (-0.116). ELMA has less debt than KFFB: ELMA (675K) vs KFFB (71M). ELMA has higher revenues than KFFB: ELMA (10.3M) vs KFFB (7.56M).
ELMAKFFBELMA / KFFB
Capitalization15M30.9M49%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-0.1160.204-57%
P/E RatioN/A98.75-
Revenue10.3M7.56M136%
Total CashN/A2.28M-
Total Debt675K71M1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ELMA vs KFFB: Fundamental Ratings
ELMA
KFFB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2587
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
18
Undervalued
84
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
20100
SMR RATING
1..100
6490
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5847
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
598
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ELMA's Valuation (18) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for KFFB (84) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that ELMA’s stock grew significantly faster than KFFB’s over the last 12 months.

ELMA's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for KFFB (100) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that ELMA’s stock grew significantly faster than KFFB’s over the last 12 months.

ELMA's SMR Rating (64) in the null industry is in the same range as KFFB (90) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that ELMA’s stock grew similarly to KFFB’s over the last 12 months.

KFFB's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as ELMA (58) in the null industry. This means that KFFB’s stock grew similarly to ELMA’s over the last 12 months.

KFFB's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the Savings Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ELMA (59) in the null industry. This means that KFFB’s stock grew somewhat faster than ELMA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ELMAKFFB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
30%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
34%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
35%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
48%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
34%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
24%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ELMA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KFFB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SKY64.560.87
+1.37%
Champion Homes Inc
ZIP4.520.04
+0.89%
ZipRecruiter
IMMP1.640.01
+0.61%
Immutep Limited
EMR140.300.61
+0.44%
Emerson Electric Co
TOPP1.71-0.03
-1.72%
Toppoint Holdings Inc

ELMA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ELMA and KFFB have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ELMA and KFFB's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ELMA
1D Price
Change %
ELMA100%
+4.14%
KFFB - ELMA
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.16%
FRST - ELMA
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.17%
CFIC - ELMA
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VALIF - ELMA
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FUNC - ELMA
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.96%
More

KFFB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KFFB and CFBK have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KFFB and CFBK's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KFFB
1D Price
Change %
KFFB100%
-1.16%
CFBK - KFFB
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.04%
CFSB - KFFB
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.07%
OPOF - KFFB
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.87%
FSEA - KFFB
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.09%
ELMA - KFFB
24%
Poorly correlated
+4.14%
More