ELMD
Price
$18.42
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 17 closing price
Capitalization
139.58M
46 days until earnings call
LUCY
Price
$2.13
Change
-$0.04 (-1.84%)
Updated
Jul 17 closing price
Capitalization
3.53M
Interact to see
Advertisement

ELMD vs LUCY

Header iconELMD vs LUCY Comparison
Open Charts ELMD vs LUCYBanner chart's image
Electromed
Price$18.42
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$753
Capitalization139.58M
Innovative Eyewear
Price$2.13
Change-$0.04 (-1.84%)
Volume$166.81K
Capitalization3.53M
ELMD vs LUCY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ELMD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LUCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ELMD vs. LUCY commentary
Jul 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ELMD is a Hold and LUCY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 18, 2025
Stock price -- (ELMD: $18.65 vs. LUCY: $2.13)
Brand notoriety: ELMD and LUCY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Medical Specialties industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ELMD: 59% vs. LUCY: 4%
Market capitalization -- ELMD: $139.58M vs. LUCY: $3.53M
ELMD [@Medical Specialties] is valued at $139.58M. LUCY’s [@Medical Specialties] market capitalization is $3.53M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Medical Specialties] industry ranges from $3.82T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Medical Specialties] industry is $8.62B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ELMD’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLUCY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • ELMD’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • LUCY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, LUCY is a better buy in the long-term than ELMD.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ELMD’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LUCY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ELMD’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • LUCY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ELMD is a better buy in the short-term than LUCY.

Price Growth

ELMD (@Medical Specialties) experienced а -6.80% price change this week, while LUCY (@Medical Specialties) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical Specialties industry was -1.87%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.09%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.33%.

Reported Earning Dates

ELMD is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2025.

LUCY is expected to report earnings on May 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Medical Specialties (-1.87% weekly)

Medical specialties are companies that make equipment used by the health care industry. Equipment manufactured and distributed by these companies include dialysis machines, blood analysis equipment, surgical equipment, dental instruments, and diagnostic tools, among other items. Large companies typically aim to produce and distribute high-quality products across a broad market spectrum. Smaller firms are more likely to specialize in a particular market segment. Due to the industry’s close association with medical treatments, they typically have low sensitivity to macroeconomic fluctuations. Within this industry, Abbott Laboratories, Medtronic Plc and Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. are some of the companies with multi-billion market capitalizations in the U.S. stock markets.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ELMD($140M) has a higher market cap than LUCY($3.53M). ELMD YTD gains are higher at: -36.887 vs. LUCY (-56.707). ELMD has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 5.81M vs. LUCY (-6.58M). ELMD has more cash in the bank: 10.4M vs. LUCY (4.29M). LUCY has less debt than ELMD: LUCY (61.4K) vs ELMD (1.09M). ELMD has higher revenues than LUCY: ELMD (51.7M) vs LUCY (1.15M).
ELMDLUCYELMD / LUCY
Capitalization140M3.53M3,971%
EBITDA5.81M-6.58M-88%
Gain YTD-36.887-56.70765%
P/E Ratio36.04N/A-
Revenue51.7M1.15M4,488%
Total Cash10.4M4.29M243%
Total Debt1.09M61.4K1,774%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ELMD: Fundamental Ratings
ELMD
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
79
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
96
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
80
SMR RATING
1..100
52
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
64
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
82
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ELMDLUCY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ELMD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LUCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CBUS1.730.09
+5.49%
Cibus
FFIV300.347.22
+2.46%
F5, Inc.
IVR7.41-0.06
-0.80%
Invesco Mortgage Capital
KGS31.65-0.30
-0.94%
Kodiak Gas Services
JAGX2.32-0.12
-4.92%
Jaguar Health Inc

ELMD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ELMD has been loosely correlated with KRMD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ELMD jumps, then KRMD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ELMD
1D Price
Change %
ELMD100%
+1.25%
KRMD - ELMD
33%
Loosely correlated
+5.43%
BIO - ELMD
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.97%
BDSX - ELMD
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.34%
RVTY - ELMD
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.72%
SMTI - ELMD
29%
Poorly correlated
-1.54%
More

LUCY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LUCY and XWEL have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LUCY and XWEL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LUCY
1D Price
Change %
LUCY100%
-1.39%
XWEL - LUCY
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.98%
SRDX - LUCY
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.91%
ELMD - LUCY
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.25%
COO - LUCY
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.77%
IMDX - LUCY
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More