ELPQF
Price
$5.18
Change
+$0.54 (+11.64%)
Updated
Nov 12 closing price
Capitalization
6.98B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
LCMRF
Price
$2.81
Change
+$0.56 (+24.89%)
Updated
Sep 29 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ELPQF vs LCMRF

Header iconELPQF vs LCMRF Comparison
Open Charts ELPQF vs LCMRFBanner chart's image
El Puerto de Liverpool S.A. de C.V
Price$5.18
Change+$0.54 (+11.64%)
Volume$100
Capitalization6.98B
La Comer SAB De CV
Price$2.81
Change+$0.56 (+24.89%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
ELPQF vs LCMRF Comparison Chart in %
ELPQF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
LCMRF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ELPQF vs. LCMRF commentary
Nov 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ELPQF is a Hold and LCMRF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 20, 2025
Stock price -- (ELPQF: $5.18 vs. LCMRF: $2.81)
Brand notoriety: ELPQF and LCMRF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Department Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ELPQF: 22% vs. LCMRF: 20%
Market capitalization -- ELPQF: $6.94B vs. LCMRF: $0
ELPQF [@Department Stores] is valued at $6.94B. LCMRF’s [@Department Stores] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Department Stores] industry ranges from $12.34T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Department Stores] industry is $5.85B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ELPQF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLCMRF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ELPQF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LCMRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ELPQF is a better buy in the long-term than LCMRF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ELPQF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LCMRF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ELPQF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • LCMRF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both ELPQF and LCMRF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

ELPQF (@Department Stores) experienced а +11.76% price change this week, while LCMRF (@Department Stores) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Department Stores industry was -1.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.34%, and the average quarterly price growth was +27.23%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Department Stores (-1.10% weekly)

A department store sells a wide variety of consumer goods under different “departments,” including (but not necessarily limited to) apparel, household appliances, home furnishings, personal care products, cosmetics, consumer electronics. During healthy macroeconomic conditions, consumers typically won’t shy away from big-ticket purchases; but during a downturn, consumer spending might get limited to the most necessary/daily essentials. Several department stores purchase items on bulk from manufacturers for resale to consumers at a profit. Some of the largest department stores companies in the U.S. include Kohl’s Corporation, Macy’s Inc., and Ollie’s Bargain Outlet Holdings Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LCMRF YTD gains are higher at: 65.052 vs. ELPQF (4.996). ELPQF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 37.2B vs. LCMRF (4.78B). ELPQF has higher revenues than LCMRF: ELPQF (224B) vs LCMRF (43.3B).
ELPQFLCMRFELPQF / LCMRF
Capitalization6.98BN/A-
EBITDA37.2B4.78B778%
Gain YTD4.99665.0528%
P/E Ratio6.62N/A-
Revenue224B43.3B517%
Total Cash11.3BN/A-
Total Debt55.6BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ELPQF: Fundamental Ratings
ELPQF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
30
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
11
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
57
SMR RATING
1..100
62
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
52
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
46
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
10

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ELPQFLCMRF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
33%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
33%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
23%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
17%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
25%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
22%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
18%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
20%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
18%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
33%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ELPQF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
LCMRF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VPC18.290.08
+0.45%
Virtus Private Credit ETF
TAXX50.80N/A
N/A
BondBloxx IR+M Tax-Awr Shrt Dur ETF
RNTY48.98N/A
N/A
Yieldmax Target 12 Real Estate Option Income ETF
IBHF23.13-0.01
-0.04%
iShares iBonds 2026 Term HY & Inc ETF
CPNM25.65-0.03
-0.13%
Calamos Nasdaq-100 Str Alt Prt ETF-Mar

ELPQF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ELPQF and DDS have been poorly correlated (+12% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ELPQF and DDS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ELPQF
1D Price
Change %
ELPQF100%
N/A
DDS - ELPQF
12%
Poorly correlated
+0.57%
KSS - ELPQF
10%
Poorly correlated
-1.63%
CBDBY - ELPQF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
M - ELPQF
2%
Poorly correlated
+1.88%
WHGPF - ELPQF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

LCMRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LCMRF and ELPQF have been poorly correlated (+-0% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LCMRF and ELPQF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LCMRF
1D Price
Change %
LCMRF100%
N/A
ELPQF - LCMRF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WHGPF - LCMRF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PPASF - LCMRF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A