ELRNF
Price
$2.38
Change
+$0.25 (+11.74%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
96.62M
FSEN
Price
$14.08
Change
+$0.02 (+0.14%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
1.07B
Interact to see
Advertisement

ELRNF vs FSEN

Header iconELRNF vs FSEN Comparison
Open Charts ELRNF vs FSENBanner chart's image
Elron Ventures
Price$2.38
Change+$0.25 (+11.74%)
Volume$2.6K
Capitalization96.62M
FS Energy & Power Fund
Price$14.08
Change+$0.02 (+0.14%)
Volume$593
Capitalization1.07B
ELRNF vs FSEN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ELRNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FSEN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ELRNF vs. FSEN commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ELRNF is a Buy and FSEN is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (ELRNF: $2.38 vs. FSEN: $14.08)
Brand notoriety: ELRNF and FSEN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ELRNF: 105% vs. FSEN: 103%
Market capitalization -- ELRNF: $96.62M vs. FSEN: $1.07B
ELRNF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $96.62M. FSEN’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $1.07B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $170.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.5B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ELRNF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFSEN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ELRNF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FSEN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ELRNF is a better buy in the long-term than FSEN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ELRNF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FSEN’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ELRNF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • FSEN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FSEN is a better buy in the short-term than ELRNF.

Price Growth

ELRNF (@Investment Managers) experienced а +12.00% price change this week, while FSEN (@Investment Managers) price change was +0.14% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.27%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.32% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSEN($1.07B) has a higher market cap than ELRNF($96.6M). FSEN has higher P/E ratio than ELRNF: FSEN (12.03) vs ELRNF (6.26). ELRNF YTD gains are higher at: 209.938 vs. FSEN (3.683). FSEN has more cash in the bank: 369M vs. ELRNF (7.92M). ELRNF has less debt than FSEN: ELRNF (10.3M) vs FSEN (398M). FSEN has higher revenues than ELRNF: FSEN (107M) vs ELRNF (-4.41M).
ELRNFFSENELRNF / FSEN
Capitalization96.6M1.07B9%
EBITDA30.9MN/A-
Gain YTD209.9383.6835,701%
P/E Ratio6.2612.0352%
Revenue-4.41M107M-4%
Total Cash7.92M369M2%
Total Debt10.3M398M3%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ELRNF: Fundamental Ratings
ELRNF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
30
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
15
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
46
SMR RATING
1..100
44
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
35
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ELRNFFSEN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
24%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
34%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
32%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
43%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
41%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ELRNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FSEN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WMMVF3.040.08
+2.62%
Wal-Mart De Mexico S.A.B. de C.V.
SDRMF4.21N/A
N/A
SITEMINDER LTD
VNRGF26.39N/A
N/A
Vienna Insurance Group
PYYX3.85N/A
N/A
Pyxus International, Inc.
NGXLF0.05N/A
N/A
NGX LTD.

ELRNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ELRNF and AC have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ELRNF and AC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ELRNF
1D Price
Change %
ELRNF100%
+11.74%
AC - ELRNF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JTCPF - ELRNF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TEKCF - ELRNF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BBXIA - ELRNF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BBXIB - ELRNF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

FSEN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FSEN and BRDG have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FSEN and BRDG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSEN
1D Price
Change %
FSEN100%
N/A
BRDG - FSEN
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BBXIA - FSEN
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ELRNF - FSEN
0%
Poorly correlated
+11.74%
DVDDF - FSEN
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BBXIB - FSEN
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More