ELRNF
Price
$1.15
Change
-$0.01 (-0.86%)
Updated
Dec 19 closing price
TRNLY
Price
$1.80
Change
-$0.04 (-2.17%)
Updated
Dec 4 closing price
Ad is loading...

ELRNF vs TRNLY

Header iconELRNF vs TRNLY Comparison
Open Charts ELRNF vs TRNLYBanner chart's image
Elron Ventures
Price$1.15
Change-$0.01 (-0.86%)
Volume$870
CapitalizationN/A
The Trendlines Group
Price$1.80
Change-$0.04 (-2.17%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
ELRNF vs TRNLY Comparison Chart
Loading...
ELRNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TRNLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ELRNF vs. TRNLY commentary
Dec 20, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ELRNF is a Hold and TRNLY is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 20, 2024
Stock price -- (ELRNF: $1.15 vs. TRNLY: $1.80)
Brand notoriety: ELRNF and TRNLY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ELRNF: 51% vs. TRNLY: 4%
Market capitalization -- ELRNF: $67.84M vs. TRNLY: $68.84M
ELRNF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $67.84M. TRNLY’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $68.84M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.91B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ELRNF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTRNLY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ELRNF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TRNLY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ELRNF is a better buy in the long-term than TRNLY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ELRNF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TRNLY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ELRNF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • TRNLY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TRNLY is a better buy in the short-term than ELRNF.

Price Growth

ELRNF (@Investment Managers) experienced а -19.30% price change this week, while TRNLY (@Investment Managers) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -2.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.22%.

Reported Earning Dates

ELRNF is expected to report earnings on Nov 18, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-2.32% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRNLY($68.8M) and ELRNF($67.8M) have the same market capitalization . TRNLY has higher P/E ratio than ELRNF: TRNLY (7.00) vs ELRNF (0.85). ELRNF YTD gains are higher at: 7.657 vs. TRNLY (-47.059). ELRNF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 71.2M vs. TRNLY (-10.49M). ELRNF has more cash in the bank: 55.5M vs. TRNLY (6.57M). TRNLY has less debt than ELRNF: TRNLY (4.85M) vs ELRNF (8.82M). TRNLY has higher revenues than ELRNF: TRNLY (3.58M) vs ELRNF (0).
ELRNFTRNLYELRNF / TRNLY
Capitalization67.8M68.8M99%
EBITDA71.2M-10.49M-678%
Gain YTD7.657-47.059-16%
P/E Ratio0.857.0012%
Revenue03.58M-
Total Cash55.5M6.57M845%
Total Debt8.82M4.85M182%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ELRNF vs TRNLY: Fundamental Ratings
ELRNF
TRNLY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9517
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
1
Undervalued
53
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
81100
SMR RATING
1..100
9197
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3882
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9692
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8585

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ELRNF's Valuation (1) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TRNLY (53). This means that ELRNF’s stock grew somewhat faster than TRNLY’s over the last 12 months.

ELRNF's Profit vs Risk Rating (81) in the null industry is in the same range as TRNLY (100). This means that ELRNF’s stock grew similarly to TRNLY’s over the last 12 months.

ELRNF's SMR Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as TRNLY (97). This means that ELRNF’s stock grew similarly to TRNLY’s over the last 12 months.

ELRNF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TRNLY (82). This means that ELRNF’s stock grew somewhat faster than TRNLY’s over the last 12 months.

TRNLY's P/E Growth Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as ELRNF (96). This means that TRNLY’s stock grew similarly to ELRNF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ELRNFTRNLY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
27%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
29%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
33%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
44%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
50%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
ELRNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TRNLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LGMK1.560.03
+1.96%
LogicMark Inc
FC36.790.42
+1.15%
Franklin Covey Company
WRAP1.57N/A
N/A
Wrap Technologies
SBCF26.64-0.02
-0.08%
Seacoast Banking Corp
WCC175.14-0.56
-0.32%
Wesco International

ELRNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ELRNF and AC have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ELRNF and AC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ELRNF
1D Price
Change %
ELRNF100%
-0.86%
AC - ELRNF
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.10%
JTCPF - ELRNF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EATBF - ELRNF
11%
Poorly correlated
-3.53%
TEKCF - ELRNF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BBXIA - ELRNF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

TRNLY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TRNLY has been loosely correlated with NINTF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TRNLY jumps, then NINTF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TRNLY
1D Price
Change %
TRNLY100%
N/A
NINTF - TRNLY
45%
Loosely correlated
N/A
HNNA - TRNLY
23%
Poorly correlated
+2.42%
ELRNF - TRNLY
3%
Poorly correlated
-0.86%
FNNCF - TRNLY
2%
Poorly correlated
-1.02%
FNCSF - TRNLY
1%
Poorly correlated
+0.85%
More