ELRNF
Price
$1.55
Change
-$0.55 (-26.19%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
94.88M
TRNLY
Price
$1.20
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 22 closing price
Capitalization
29.67M
Interact to see
Advertisement

ELRNF vs TRNLY

Header iconELRNF vs TRNLY Comparison
Open Charts ELRNF vs TRNLYBanner chart's image
Elron Ventures
Price$1.55
Change-$0.55 (-26.19%)
Volume$372
Capitalization94.88M
The Trendlines Group
Price$1.20
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$5.67K
Capitalization29.67M
ELRNF vs TRNLY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ELRNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TRNLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ELRNF vs. TRNLY commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ELRNF is a Hold and TRNLY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (ELRNF: $1.55 vs. TRNLY: $1.20)
Brand notoriety: ELRNF and TRNLY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ELRNF: 18% vs. TRNLY: 96%
Market capitalization -- ELRNF: $94.88M vs. TRNLY: $29.67M
ELRNF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $94.88M. TRNLY’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $29.67M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $177.66B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.38B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ELRNF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTRNLY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ELRNF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • TRNLY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ELRNF is a better buy in the long-term than TRNLY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ELRNF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TRNLY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ELRNF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • TRNLY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ELRNF is a better buy in the short-term than TRNLY.

Price Growth

ELRNF (@Investment Managers) experienced а -26.19% price change this week, while TRNLY (@Investment Managers) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -2.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.01%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-2.06% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ELRNF($94.9M) has a higher market cap than TRNLY($29.7M). ELRNF YTD gains are higher at: 89.505 vs. TRNLY (-24.528). ELRNF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 30.9M vs. TRNLY (-14.99M). ELRNF has more cash in the bank: 7.92M vs. TRNLY (2.89M). TRNLY has less debt than ELRNF: TRNLY (5.45M) vs ELRNF (7.16M). TRNLY has higher revenues than ELRNF: TRNLY (643K) vs ELRNF (-4.41M).
ELRNFTRNLYELRNF / TRNLY
Capitalization94.9M29.7M320%
EBITDA30.9M-14.99M-206%
Gain YTD89.505-24.528-365%
P/E Ratio4.08N/A-
Revenue-4.41M643K-686%
Total Cash7.92M2.89M274%
Total Debt7.16M5.45M131%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ELRNF vs TRNLY: Fundamental Ratings
ELRNF
TRNLY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9896
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
15
Undervalued
69
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
72100
SMR RATING
1..100
4496
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4263
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1890
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a35

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ELRNF's Valuation (15) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TRNLY (69). This means that ELRNF’s stock grew somewhat faster than TRNLY’s over the last 12 months.

ELRNF's Profit vs Risk Rating (72) in the null industry is in the same range as TRNLY (100). This means that ELRNF’s stock grew similarly to TRNLY’s over the last 12 months.

ELRNF's SMR Rating (44) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TRNLY (96). This means that ELRNF’s stock grew somewhat faster than TRNLY’s over the last 12 months.

ELRNF's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as TRNLY (63). This means that ELRNF’s stock grew similarly to TRNLY’s over the last 12 months.

ELRNF's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for TRNLY (90). This means that ELRNF’s stock grew significantly faster than TRNLY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ELRNFTRNLY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
36%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
33%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ELRNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TRNLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MPCB14.00N/A
N/A
Mountain Pacific Bancorp Inc.
BHKLY93.50-1.54
-1.62%
BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd.
BLSFY73.32-1.42
-1.91%
Bluescope Steel, Ltd.
ACNDF0.92-0.02
-2.09%
Ascendas India Trust
NBYCF0.06N/A
-6.80%
Niobay Metals Inc.

TRNLY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TRNLY has been loosely correlated with NINTF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TRNLY jumps, then NINTF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TRNLY
1D Price
Change %
TRNLY100%
N/A
NINTF - TRNLY
45%
Loosely correlated
N/A
HNNA - TRNLY
23%
Poorly correlated
+5.14%
ELRNF - TRNLY
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FNNCF - TRNLY
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FNCSF - TRNLY
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More