It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ELS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMAA’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ELS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MAA’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
ELS (@Media Conglomerates) experienced а -0.37% price change this week, while MAA (@Media Conglomerates) price change was -2.20% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Media Conglomerates industry was -0.36%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.37%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.25%.
ELS is expected to report earnings on Oct 20, 2025.
MAA is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.
Companies that operate in these three (or more) areas: broadcasting, cable TV, publishing and movies/entertainment. The companies usually have a large share in these markets. Walt Disney Co . is an example.
ELS | MAA | ELS / MAA | |
Capitalization | 11.9B | 16.6B | 72% |
EBITDA | 727M | 1.37B | 53% |
Gain YTD | -6.172 | -5.226 | 118% |
P/E Ratio | 31.70 | 29.26 | 108% |
Revenue | 1.43B | 2.2B | 65% |
Total Cash | 9.91M | 54.5M | 18% |
Total Debt | 3.25B | 5.05B | 64% |
ELS | MAA | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 11 | 19 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 50 Fair valued | 50 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 89 | 66 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 40 | 73 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 76 | 78 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 90 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ELS's Valuation (50) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as MAA (50). This means that ELS’s stock grew similarly to MAA’s over the last 12 months.
MAA's Profit vs Risk Rating (66) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as ELS (89). This means that MAA’s stock grew similarly to ELS’s over the last 12 months.
ELS's SMR Rating (40) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MAA (73). This means that ELS’s stock grew somewhat faster than MAA’s over the last 12 months.
ELS's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as MAA (50). This means that ELS’s stock grew similarly to MAA’s over the last 12 months.
ELS's P/E Growth Rating (76) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as MAA (78). This means that ELS’s stock grew similarly to MAA’s over the last 12 months.
ELS | MAA | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago35% | 2 days ago55% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago58% | 2 days ago41% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago49% | 2 days ago68% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago50% | 2 days ago47% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago56% | 2 days ago60% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago51% | 9 days ago58% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 19 days ago51% | 24 days ago49% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago50% | N/A |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago57% | 2 days ago58% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
BUFQ | 34.57 | 0.08 | +0.23% |
FT Vest Laddered Nasdaq Buffer ETF | |||
MLPB | 25.54 | 0.01 | +0.02% |
UBS ETRACS Alerian MLPInfrs ETN SerB | |||
USSH | 50.91 | N/A | N/A |
WisdomTree 1-3 Year Laddered Trsy ETF | |||
BSTP | 36.07 | -0.01 | -0.04% |
Innovator Buffer Step-Up Strategy ETF | |||
IBGL | 24.97 | -0.09 | -0.34% |
iShares iBonds Dec 2055 Term Trsy ETF |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ELS has been closely correlated with SUI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ELS jumps, then SUI could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ELS | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
ELS | 100% | -0.05% | ||
SUI - ELS | 72% Closely correlated | -0.98% | ||
UMH - ELS | 69% Closely correlated | -0.52% | ||
CUBE - ELS | 66% Loosely correlated | -1.06% | ||
FCPT - ELS | 64% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
AMH - ELS | 63% Loosely correlated | -1.42% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MAA has been closely correlated with CPT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MAA jumps, then CPT could also see price increases.