It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
EM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while.
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
EM’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SABR’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
EM (@Other Consumer Services) experienced а 0.00% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Consumer Services industry was +1.29%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.80%.
Other consumer services include companies that provide consumer services, and are not classified elsewhere. Travel fare aggregators, hotel bookings, consumer-to-consumer or business-to-business sales platforms are some examples of services that can be clubbed into this category. Many of such services have expanded online. Booking Holdings Inc, The Priceline Group Inc, and eBay Inc. are some major operators in this segment.
EM | SABR | EM / SABR | |
Capitalization | 162M | 918M | 18% |
EBITDA | -262M | 103M | -254% |
Gain YTD | 47.786 | -16.591 | -288% |
P/E Ratio | 11.48 | N/A | - |
Revenue | 3.27B | 2.91B | 112% |
Total Cash | 3.13B | 700M | 447% |
Total Debt | 16.8M | 4.89B | 0% |
SABR | ||
---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 22 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 11 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 46 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 91 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 95 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
EM | SABR | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago86% | 1 day ago90% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago90% | 1 day ago90% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago70% | 1 day ago79% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago72% | 1 day ago87% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago79% | 1 day ago85% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago90% | 1 day ago79% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago77% | 5 days ago78% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago90% | 3 days ago87% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago84% | 1 day ago84% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago90% | 1 day ago78% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
PRGTX | 20.87 | 0.14 | +0.68% |
T. Rowe Price Global Technology | |||
SBIDX | 9.99 | 0.03 | +0.30% |
Sterling Capital Behavioral Intl Eq C | |||
MGBRX | 17.67 | 0.05 | +0.28% |
MFS Global Total Return R2 | |||
LOAGX | 14.05 | N/A | N/A |
Lord Abbett International Growth F3 | |||
FEATX | 45.62 | -0.29 | -0.63% |
Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia M |
A.I.dvisor tells us that EM and TCOM have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EM and TCOM's prices will move in lockstep.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SABR has been loosely correlated with BFAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SABR jumps, then BFAM could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SABR | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
SABR | 100% | +1.94% | ||
BFAM - SABR | 35% Loosely correlated | +2.48% | ||
SCI - SABR | 32% Poorly correlated | +0.83% | ||
NCLH - SABR | 30% Poorly correlated | +2.76% | ||
CCL - SABR | 28% Poorly correlated | +1.08% | ||
LIND - SABR | 26% Poorly correlated | -0.78% | ||
More |