EMBVF
Price
$10.06
Change
-$0.04 (-0.40%)
Updated
Jul 16 closing price
Capitalization
17.33B
YKLTY
Price
$8.52
Change
-$0.34 (-3.84%)
Updated
Jul 16 closing price
Capitalization
8.76B
Interact to see
Advertisement

EMBVF vs YKLTY

Header iconEMBVF vs YKLTY Comparison
Open Charts EMBVF vs YKLTYBanner chart's image
Arca Continental SAB de CV
Price$10.06
Change-$0.04 (-0.40%)
Volume$6.83K
Capitalization17.33B
Yakult Honsha
Price$8.52
Change-$0.34 (-3.84%)
Volume$1.21K
Capitalization8.76B
EMBVF vs YKLTY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EMBVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
YKLTY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EMBVF vs. YKLTY commentary
Jul 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMBVF is a Buy and YKLTY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 18, 2025
Stock price -- (EMBVF: $10.06 vs. YKLTY: $8.52)
Brand notoriety: EMBVF and YKLTY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EMBVF: 294% vs. YKLTY: 42%
Market capitalization -- EMBVF: $17.33B vs. YKLTY: $8.76B
EMBVF [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] is valued at $17.33B. YKLTY’s [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] market capitalization is $8.76B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] industry ranges from $263.76B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] industry is $24.2B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EMBVF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileYKLTY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EMBVF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • YKLTY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, EMBVF is a better buy in the long-term than YKLTY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EMBVF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while YKLTY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EMBVF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • YKLTY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EMBVF is a better buy in the short-term than YKLTY.

Price Growth

EMBVF (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) experienced а +1.26% price change this week, while YKLTY (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) price change was -10.60% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry was +1.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.72%.

Reported Earning Dates

YKLTY is expected to report earnings on May 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic (+1.16% weekly)

Non-alcoholic drinks include traces of alcohol or low alcohol content or without alcohol or alcohol removed. Functional Beverages, Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSDs), Sports Drinks, Fruit Beverages, and Bottled Water are some common types of non-alcoholic beverages. The largest segment in this market is soft drinks (think Pepsi and Coke). Many established companies in this space have also been stepping up production of low to zero-calorie varieties in recent years, to cater to a rising number of health-conscious consumers. Coca-Cola Company, Pepsico Inc, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation are some major non-alcoholic beverage makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EMBVF($17.3B) has a higher market cap than YKLTY($8.76B). YKLTY has higher P/E ratio than EMBVF: YKLTY (23.53) vs EMBVF (14.75). EMBVF YTD gains are higher at: 21.881 vs. YKLTY (-6.167). YKLTY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 105B vs. EMBVF (40.7B). YKLTY has more cash in the bank: 241B vs. EMBVF (27.9B). EMBVF has less debt than YKLTY: EMBVF (47.8B) vs YKLTY (77.1B). YKLTY has higher revenues than EMBVF: YKLTY (483B) vs EMBVF (215B).
EMBVFYKLTYEMBVF / YKLTY
Capitalization17.3B8.76B198%
EBITDA40.7B105B39%
Gain YTD21.881-6.167-355%
P/E Ratio14.7523.5363%
Revenue215B483B45%
Total Cash27.9B241B12%
Total Debt47.8B77.1B62%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EMBVF vs YKLTY: Fundamental Ratings
EMBVF
YKLTY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8054
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
25
Undervalued
45
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
25100
SMR RATING
1..100
514
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5881
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6554
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EMBVF's Valuation (25) in the null industry is in the same range as YKLTY (45). This means that EMBVF’s stock grew similarly to YKLTY’s over the last 12 months.

EMBVF's Profit vs Risk Rating (25) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for YKLTY (100). This means that EMBVF’s stock grew significantly faster than YKLTY’s over the last 12 months.

YKLTY's SMR Rating (4) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EMBVF (51). This means that YKLTY’s stock grew somewhat faster than EMBVF’s over the last 12 months.

EMBVF's Price Growth Rating (58) in the null industry is in the same range as YKLTY (81). This means that EMBVF’s stock grew similarly to YKLTY’s over the last 12 months.

YKLTY's P/E Growth Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as EMBVF (65). This means that YKLTY’s stock grew similarly to EMBVF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EMBVFYKLTY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
49%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
36%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EMBVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
YKLTY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EBND21.180.08
+0.38%
SPDR® Blmbg Em Mkts Lcl Bd ETF
EQLT26.680.06
+0.22%
iShares MSCI Emerging Mkts Qual Fac ETF
IVVM32.680.06
+0.18%
iShares Large Cap Moderate Buffer ETF
BKWO36.49N/A
N/A
BNY Mellon Women's Opportunities ETF
EIPX25.58-0.09
-0.36%
FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF

EMBVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EMBVF and KOF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EMBVF and KOF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EMBVF
1D Price
Change %
EMBVF100%
-0.44%
KOF - EMBVF
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.58%
NTEI - EMBVF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JSDA - EMBVF
7%
Poorly correlated
+4.79%
SHOT - EMBVF
6%
Poorly correlated
+15.10%
FQVTF - EMBVF
4%
Poorly correlated
-0.14%
More

YKLTY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that YKLTY and YNAJF have been poorly correlated (+14% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that YKLTY and YNAJF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To YKLTY
1D Price
Change %
YKLTY100%
-3.84%
YNAJF - YKLTY
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FQVTF - YKLTY
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.14%
EMBVF - YKLTY
2%
Poorly correlated
-0.44%
SHOT - YKLTY
1%
Poorly correlated
+15.10%
JSDA - YKLTY
1%
Poorly correlated
+4.79%
More