EMBVF
Price
$8.54
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 1 closing price
YKLTY
Price
$10.90
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 4 closing price
Ad is loading...

EMBVF vs YKLTY

Header iconEMBVF vs YKLTY Comparison
Open Charts EMBVF vs YKLTYBanner chart's image
Arca Continental SAB de CV
Price$8.54
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$401
CapitalizationN/A
Yakult Honsha
Price$10.90
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$576
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
EMBVF vs YKLTY Comparison Chart
Loading...
VS
EMBVF vs. YKLTY commentary
Nov 06, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMBVF is a Hold and YKLTY is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 06, 2024
Stock price -- (EMBVF: $8.54 vs. YKLTY: $10.90)
Brand notoriety: EMBVF and YKLTY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EMBVF: 8% vs. YKLTY: 19%
Market capitalization -- EMBVF: $17.33B vs. YKLTY: $8.76B
EMBVF [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] is valued at $17.33B. YKLTY’s [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] market capitalization is $8.76B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] industry ranges from $263.76B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] industry is $21.99B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EMBVF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileYKLTY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • EMBVF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • YKLTY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, EMBVF is a better buy in the long-term than YKLTY.

Price Growth

EMBVF (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) experienced а -4.15% price change this week, while YKLTY (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) price change was +1.21% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry was +1.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.22%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic (+1.28% weekly)

Non-alcoholic drinks include traces of alcohol or low alcohol content or without alcohol or alcohol removed. Functional Beverages, Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSDs), Sports Drinks, Fruit Beverages, and Bottled Water are some common types of non-alcoholic beverages. The largest segment in this market is soft drinks (think Pepsi and Coke). Many established companies in this space have also been stepping up production of low to zero-calorie varieties in recent years, to cater to a rising number of health-conscious consumers. Coca-Cola Company, Pepsico Inc, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation are some major non-alcoholic beverage makers.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EMBVF($17.3B) has a higher market cap than YKLTY($8.76B). YKLTY has higher P/E ratio than EMBVF: YKLTY (23.53) vs EMBVF (14.75). YKLTY YTD gains are higher at: -0.558 vs. EMBVF (-19.737). YKLTY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 105B vs. EMBVF (40.7B). YKLTY has more cash in the bank: 241B vs. EMBVF (27.9B). EMBVF has less debt than YKLTY: EMBVF (47.8B) vs YKLTY (77.1B). YKLTY has higher revenues than EMBVF: YKLTY (483B) vs EMBVF (215B).
EMBVFYKLTYEMBVF / YKLTY
Capitalization17.3B8.76B198%
EBITDA40.7B105B39%
Gain YTD-19.737-0.5583,536%
P/E Ratio14.7523.5363%
Revenue215B483B45%
Total Cash27.9B241B12%
Total Debt47.8B77.1B62%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EMBVF vs YKLTY: Fundamental Ratings
EMBVF
YKLTY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7969
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
16
Undervalued
96
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
35100
SMR RATING
1..100
5568
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7857
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7971
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EMBVF's Valuation (16) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for YKLTY (96). This means that EMBVF’s stock grew significantly faster than YKLTY’s over the last 12 months.

EMBVF's Profit vs Risk Rating (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for YKLTY (100). This means that EMBVF’s stock grew somewhat faster than YKLTY’s over the last 12 months.

EMBVF's SMR Rating (55) in the null industry is in the same range as YKLTY (68). This means that EMBVF’s stock grew similarly to YKLTY’s over the last 12 months.

YKLTY's Price Growth Rating (57) in the null industry is in the same range as EMBVF (78). This means that YKLTY’s stock grew similarly to EMBVF’s over the last 12 months.

YKLTY's P/E Growth Rating (71) in the null industry is in the same range as EMBVF (79). This means that YKLTY’s stock grew similarly to EMBVF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GRNB23.970.07
+0.31%
VanEck Green Bond ETF
FXD62.460.18
+0.29%
First Trust Cnsmr Discret AlphaDEX® ETF
QDIV35.500.06
+0.17%
Global X S&P 500® Quality Dividend ETF
FCFY23.91N/A
N/A
First Trust S&P 500 Div Fr CA Flw ETF
PALC49.19-0.18
-0.36%
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Mlt Ftr Alt ETF

EMBVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EMBVF and KOF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EMBVF and KOF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EMBVF
1D Price
Change %
EMBVF100%
N/A
KOF - EMBVF
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.93%
NTEI - EMBVF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JSDA - EMBVF
7%
Poorly correlated
-9.23%
SHOT - EMBVF
6%
Poorly correlated
+2.88%
FQVTF - EMBVF
4%
Poorly correlated
-0.79%
More

YKLTY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that YKLTY and YNAJF have been poorly correlated (+14% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that YKLTY and YNAJF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To YKLTY
1D Price
Change %
YKLTY100%
+1.11%
YNAJF - YKLTY
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FQVTF - YKLTY
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.79%
EMBVF - YKLTY
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SHOT - YKLTY
1%
Poorly correlated
+2.88%
JSDA - YKLTY
1%
Poorly correlated
-9.23%
More