Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EMC vs FDEM
EMC vs FDEM Comparison
Open Charts EMC vs FDEM
Global X Emerging Mkts Great Cnsmr ETF
Price$29.12
Change+$0.15 (+0.52%)
Volume$371
Net Assets83.39M
Fidelity Emerging Markets Mltfct ETF
Price$28.06
Change+$0.15 (+0.54%)
Volume$119
Net Assets189.98M
EMC vs FDEM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EMC vs. FDEM commentary
Jul 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMC is a Hold and FDEM is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FDEM has more net assets: 190M vs. EMC (83.4M). FDEM has a higher annual dividend yield than EMC: FDEM (12.679) vs EMC (11.555). EMC was incepted earlier than FDEM: EMC (15 years) vs FDEM (6 years). FDEM (0.25) has a lower expense ratio than EMC (0.75). EMC has a higher turnover FDEM (65.00) vs FDEM (65.00).
| EMC | FDEM | EMC / FDEM | |
| Gain YTD | 11.555 | 12.679 | 91% |
| Net Assets | 83.4M | 190M | 44% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.25 | 300% |
| Turnover | 72.71 | 65.00 | 112% |
| Yield | 0.99 | 3.77 | 26% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| EMC | FDEM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 86% | 7 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
EMC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EMC has been closely correlated with TSM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EMC jumps, then TSM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EMC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EMC | 100% | -1.06% | ||
| TSM - EMC | 70% Closely correlated | -2.40% | ||
| BIDU - EMC | 58% Loosely correlated | +3.98% | ||
| HTHT - EMC | 57% Loosely correlated | +2.17% | ||
| TCOM - EMC | 55% Loosely correlated | +4.63% | ||
| YUMC - EMC | 51% Loosely correlated | +3.98% | ||
More | ||||
FDEM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDEM has been loosely correlated with QFIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FDEM jumps, then QFIN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FDEM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDEM | 100% | -1.03% | ||
| QFIN - FDEM | 54% Loosely correlated | +0.84% | ||
| ATHM - FDEM | 34% Loosely correlated | +1.26% | ||
| YUMC - FDEM | 33% Poorly correlated | +3.98% | ||
| VIPS - FDEM | 29% Poorly correlated | -0.20% | ||
| OMAB - FDEM | 27% Poorly correlated | +1.85% | ||
More | ||||