Intraday BUY SELL Signals
58 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDEM vs VIPS
FDEM vs VIPS Comparison
Open Charts FDEM vs VIPS
FDEM vs VIPS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDEM vs. VIPS commentary
Sep 27, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDEM is a StrongBuy and VIPS is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
VIPS: Fundamental Ratings
VIPS | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 12 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 8 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 38 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 75 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 96 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FDEM | VIPS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 89% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 76% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 73% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 86% | 6 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% | 13 days ago 75% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
FDEM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDEM has been loosely correlated with Q. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FDEM jumps, then Q could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FDEM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDEM | 100% | +0.61% | ||
| Q - FDEM | 52% Loosely correlated | +1.95% | ||
| ATHM - FDEM | 39% Loosely correlated | +0.14% | ||
| MNSO - FDEM | 35% Loosely correlated | -1.68% | ||
| VIPS - FDEM | 32% Poorly correlated | +0.08% | ||
| YUMC - FDEM | 18% Poorly correlated | -1.27% | ||
More | ||||
VIPS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VIPS has been loosely correlated with BABA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VIPS jumps, then BABA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To VIPS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VIPS | 100% | +0.08% | ||
| BABA - VIPS | 48% Loosely correlated | -0.80% | ||
| PDD - VIPS | 47% Loosely correlated | -0.81% | ||
| JD - VIPS | 47% Loosely correlated | -0.90% | ||
| BZUN - VIPS | 36% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| RERE - VIPS | 36% Loosely correlated | +0.25% | ||
More | ||||