EMCHF
Price
$0.46
Change
-$0.08 (-14.81%)
Updated
Feb 11 closing price
Capitalization
300.53M
FBSFF
Price
$17.00
Change
-$0.90 (-5.03%)
Updated
Feb 14 closing price
Capitalization
222.5M
Ad is loading...

EMCHF vs FBSFF

Header iconEMCHF vs FBSFF Comparison
Open Charts EMCHF vs FBSFFBanner chart's image
EML Payments
Price$0.46
Change-$0.08 (-14.81%)
Volume$5K
Capitalization300.53M
Fabasoft AG
Price$17.00
Change-$0.90 (-5.03%)
Volume$150
Capitalization222.5M
EMCHF vs FBSFF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EMCHF vs. FBSFF commentary
Feb 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMCHF is a Hold and FBSFF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 23, 2025
Stock price -- (EMCHF: $0.46 vs. FBSFF: $17.00)
Brand notoriety: EMCHF and FBSFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EMCHF: 36% vs. FBSFF: 50%
Market capitalization -- EMCHF: $300.53M vs. FBSFF: $222.5M
EMCHF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $300.53M. FBSFF’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $222.5M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EMCHF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFBSFF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EMCHF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FBSFF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FBSFF is a better buy in the long-term than EMCHF.

Price Growth

EMCHF (@Packaged Software) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while FBSFF (@Packaged Software) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -2.81%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.83%, and the average quarterly price growth was +26.50%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-2.81% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EMCHF($301M) has a higher market cap than FBSFF($222M). FBSFF YTD gains are higher at: 8.905 vs. EMCHF (-9.203). FBSFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 17.4M vs. EMCHF (-118.27M). EMCHF has more cash in the bank: 1.55B vs. FBSFF (26.6M). FBSFF has less debt than EMCHF: FBSFF (7.49M) vs EMCHF (45.1M). EMCHF has higher revenues than FBSFF: EMCHF (235M) vs FBSFF (69.2M).
EMCHFFBSFFEMCHF / FBSFF
Capitalization301M222M136%
EBITDA-118.27M17.4M-680%
Gain YTD-9.2038.905-103%
P/E RatioN/A31.65-
Revenue235M69.2M340%
Total Cash1.55B26.6M5,831%
Total Debt45.1M7.49M602%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EMCHF: Fundamental Ratings
EMCHF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
70
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
91
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
61
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
15
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GDTC2.800.05
+1.82%
CytoMed Therapeutics Limited
WTM1830.01-27.70
-1.49%
White Mountains Insurance Group Ltd
RCL234.26-9.63
-3.95%
Royal Caribbean Group
GENI9.10-0.43
-4.51%
Genius Sports Limited
ORN7.07-0.65
-8.42%
Orion Group Holdings

EMCHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EMCHF has been loosely correlated with GB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EMCHF jumps, then GB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EMCHF
1D Price
Change %
EMCHF100%
N/A
GB - EMCHF
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
VHIBF - EMCHF
20%
Poorly correlated
-4.25%
DRCR - EMCHF
10%
Poorly correlated
+9.89%
EMOR - EMCHF
5%
Poorly correlated
-8.75%
DNACF - EMCHF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

FBSFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FBSFF and SWVL have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FBSFF and SWVL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FBSFF
1D Price
Change %
FBSFF100%
N/A
SWVL - FBSFF
32%
Poorly correlated
-3.32%
EBYH - FBSFF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OBLG - FBSFF
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.42%
LKCO - FBSFF
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.33%
EMCHF - FBSFF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More