EMCHF
Price
$0.64
Change
-$0.03 (-4.48%)
Updated
Sep 2 closing price
Capitalization
242.9M
FBSFF
Price
$18.00
Change
+$0.01 (+0.06%)
Updated
Jun 4 closing price
Capitalization
203.69M
Interact to see
Advertisement

EMCHF vs FBSFF

Header iconEMCHF vs FBSFF Comparison
Open Charts EMCHF vs FBSFFBanner chart's image
EML Payments
Price$0.64
Change-$0.03 (-4.48%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization242.9M
Fabasoft AG
Price$18.00
Change+$0.01 (+0.06%)
Volume$100
Capitalization203.69M
EMCHF vs FBSFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EMCHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EMCHF vs. FBSFF commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMCHF is a Hold and FBSFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (EMCHF: $0.64 vs. FBSFF: $18.00)
Brand notoriety: EMCHF and FBSFF are both not notable
EMCHF represents the Computer Communications, while FBSFF is part of the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EMCHF: 3% vs. FBSFF: 100%
Market capitalization -- EMCHF: $242.9M vs. FBSFF: $203.69M
EMCHF [@Computer Communications] is valued at $242.9M. FBSFF’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $203.69M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Communications] industry ranges from $3.77T to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $313.68B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Communications] industry is $26.87B. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $8.95B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EMCHF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFBSFF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EMCHF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FBSFF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FBSFF is a better buy in the long-term than EMCHF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EMCHF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • EMCHF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 1 bearish.

Price Growth

EMCHF (@Computer Communications) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while FBSFF (@Packaged Software) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was -0.48%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +66.12%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.82%, and the average quarterly price growth was +110.51%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Computer Communications (-0.48% weekly)

Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.

@Packaged Software (-1.06% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EMCHF($243M) has a higher market cap than FBSFF($204M). EMCHF has higher P/E ratio than FBSFF: EMCHF (31.91) vs FBSFF (18.35). EMCHF YTD gains are higher at: 24.639 vs. FBSFF (15.311). FBSFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 21.6M vs. EMCHF (-20.59M). EMCHF has more cash in the bank: 1.93B vs. FBSFF (32.3M). FBSFF has less debt than EMCHF: FBSFF (5.88M) vs EMCHF (54.1M). EMCHF has higher revenues than FBSFF: EMCHF (158M) vs FBSFF (87.6M).
EMCHFFBSFFEMCHF / FBSFF
Capitalization243M204M119%
EBITDA-20.59M21.6M-95%
Gain YTD24.63915.311161%
P/E Ratio31.9118.35174%
Revenue158M87.6M180%
Total Cash1.93B32.3M5,960%
Total Debt54.1M5.88M920%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EMCHF vs FBSFF: Fundamental Ratings
EMCHF
FBSFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3343
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
63
Fair valued
24
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9734
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4855
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1748
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7555

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FBSFF's Valuation (24) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EMCHF (63). This means that FBSFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than EMCHF’s over the last 12 months.

FBSFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as EMCHF (100). This means that FBSFF’s stock grew similarly to EMCHF’s over the last 12 months.

FBSFF's SMR Rating (34) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EMCHF (97). This means that FBSFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than EMCHF’s over the last 12 months.

EMCHF's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as FBSFF (55). This means that EMCHF’s stock grew similarly to FBSFF’s over the last 12 months.

EMCHF's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the null industry is in the same range as FBSFF (48). This means that EMCHF’s stock grew similarly to FBSFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EMCHFFBSFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
41%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
31%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
20%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
19%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EMCHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GCIEX7.61N/A
N/A
Gabelli Equity Income I
JLVRX21.87N/A
N/A
JPMorgan Large Cap Value R5
VSEAX40.41N/A
N/A
JPMorgan Small Cap Equity A
BRTNX80.40N/A
N/A
Bretton Fund
PSPIX26.65N/A
N/A
Principal SmallCap S&P 600 Index R6

EMCHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EMCHF has been loosely correlated with GB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EMCHF jumps, then GB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EMCHF
1D Price
Change %
EMCHF100%
N/A
GB - EMCHF
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
VHIBF - EMCHF
20%
Poorly correlated
-2.14%
DRCR - EMCHF
10%
Poorly correlated
+5.53%
DNACF - EMCHF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DSNY - EMCHF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

FBSFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FBSFF and SWVL have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FBSFF and SWVL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FBSFF
1D Price
Change %
FBSFF100%
N/A
SWVL - FBSFF
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.32%
EBYH - FBSFF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OBLG - FBSFF
23%
Poorly correlated
-6.51%
LKCOF - FBSFF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EMCHF - FBSFF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More