Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EMEAX vs RNWBX
EMEAX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts EMEAX vs RNWBX
Ashmore Emerging Markets Equity A
Price$12.95
Change+$0.11 (+0.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets189.12M
American Funds New World R2
Price$85.27
Change+$0.52 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.56B
EMEAX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EMEAX vs. RNWBX commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMEAX is a StrongBuy and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 70.6B vs. EMEAX (189M). EMEAX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: EMEAX (0.62) vs RNWBX (0.13). EMEAX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: EMEAX (13 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). EMEAX (1.76) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.67). EMEAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 103.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than EMEAX: RNWBX (250) vs EMEAX (1000). EMEAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.53 vs. RNWBX (10.50). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 27.64 vs. EMEAX (15.15).
| EMEAX | RNWBX | EMEAX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 1.67 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.76 | 1.67 | 105% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.575 | 15.935 | 104% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 189M | 70.6B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.62 | 0.13 | 486% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.53 | 10.50 | 110% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.27 | 37.23 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.15 | 27.64 | 55% |
| Returns for 10 years | 74.70 | 63.65 | 117% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement