Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EMEAX vs RNWBX
EMEAX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts EMEAX vs RNWBX
Ashmore Emerging Markets Equity A
Price$14.30
Change-$0.21 (-1.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets240.08M
American Funds New World R2
Price$90.50
Change-$0.93 (-1.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.89B
EMEAX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EMEAX vs. RNWBX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMEAX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 74.9B vs. EMEAX (240M). EMEAX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: EMEAX (0.58) vs RNWBX (0.12). EMEAX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: EMEAX (14 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). EMEAX (1.76) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.67). EMEAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 103.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than EMEAX: RNWBX (250) vs EMEAX (1000). EMEAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.97 vs. RNWBX (18.50). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 16.42 vs. EMEAX (4.61).
| EMEAX | RNWBX | EMEAX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 1.67 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.76 | 1.67 | 105% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 30.668 | 23.046 | 133% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 240M | 74.9B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.58 | 0.12 | 493% |
| Returns for 1 year | 27.97 | 18.50 | 151% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.66 | 43.20 | 133% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.61 | 16.42 | 28% |
| Returns for 10 years | 117.31 | 82.43 | 142% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement