Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EMECX vs RNWBX
EMECX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts EMECX vs RNWBX
Ashmore Emerging Markets Equity C
Price$11.98
Change-$0.05 (-0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets199.55M
American Funds New World R2
Price$85.67
Change-$0.40 (-0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.79B
EMECX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EMECX vs. RNWBX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMECX is a Buy and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 70.8B vs. EMECX (200M). EMECX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: EMECX (0.26) vs RNWBX (0.13). EMECX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: EMECX (13 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). EMECX (2.48) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.67). EMECX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 103.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than EMECX: RNWBX (250) vs EMECX (1000). EMECX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.13 vs. RNWBX (14.84). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 24.82 vs. EMECX (4.94).
| EMECX | RNWBX | EMECX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.05 | 1.67 | 123% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.48 | 1.67 | 149% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.688 | 16.479 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 200M | 70.8B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.26 | 0.13 | 199% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.13 | 14.84 | 122% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.82 | 37.52 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.94 | 24.82 | 20% |
| Returns for 10 years | 47.54 | 66.54 | 71% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement